"The research does not support your claims" - guy who cited no research.
Classic.
Citing research is unnecessary to point out that your own conclusions are not supported by the research you cited. No one needs to publish a study on you being a dimwit. (Anticipated response: "oh you're resorting to personal attacks, I am superior, blah blah blah")
The research does not support your claims. You are making very large leaps in logic and attributing them to “common sense.” It is true that I think your leaps in logic are misogynistic which I guess “goes against [my] beliefs”, but all you’ve done is point out a correlation and then hypothesize the causation. You have not proven the causation.
I think it’s just as likely that the cause is flipped. Women and men who struggle to form pair bonds may end up sleeping around more because they aren’t in relationships. It’s only common sense, right?
"The research does not support your claims" - guy who cited no research.
Classic.
I’m citing your research. It doesn’t prove what you think it proves. Jeff’s post above even has a blurb where the researchers admit that it doesn’t prove what you think it proves.
"The research does not support your claims" - guy who cited no research.
Classic.
Citing research is unnecessary to point out that your own conclusions are not supported by the research you cited. No one needs to publish a study on you being a dimwit. (Anticipated response: "oh you're resorting to personal attacks, I am superior, blah blah blah")
You made a claim which you did not prove. Not sure why you're defending that.
I posted claims that did support my conclusion, you just said it didn't with no reasoning. Two can play at that game - I'm right and you're wrong.
"The research does not support your claims" - guy who cited no research.
Classic.
I’m citing your research. It doesn’t prove what you think it proves. Jeff’s post above even has a blurb where the researchers admit that it doesn’t prove what you think it proves.
He said he didn't like the definition of casual sex in the one article. Good job, I guess I'm wrong.
I’m citing your research. It doesn’t prove what you think it proves. Jeff’s post above even has a blurb where the researchers admit that it doesn’t prove what you think it proves.
He said he didn't like the definition of casual sex in the one article. Good job, I guess I'm wrong.
Anyone who refers to women as "run-through" is obviously a moron...
The height & dating video you posted is absolutely brutal! Even when they made "Rob," the 5'3" guy an M.D., best-selling author & champion skier, he still was rejected by every woman on the panel because of his height. Even worse, when they made "Stu," the shortest test subject at 5'0," - a multi-millionaire he was flat rejected by everyone on the panel. Unbelievable! A complete black pill awakening.
Meanwhile, all "Chad" has to do is show up at the party & he becomes the envy of every woman. Lol
The height & dating video you posted is absolutely brutal! Even when they made "Rob," the 5'3" guy an M.D., best-selling author & champion skier, he still was rejected by every woman on the panel because of his height. Even worse, when they made "Stu," the shortest test subject at 5'0," - a multi-millionaire he was flat rejected by everyone on the panel. Unbelievable! A complete black pill awakening.
Meanwhile, all "Chad" has to do is show up at the party & he becomes the envy of every woman.
Honest question:
Do you waste all your time looking for evidence to show the odds are stacked against u? Or do you use any time making working on urself? Cuz if I were a woman, I don’t think I’d wanna spend my time with u
"Manlet" is not a demeaning term but in the manasphere simply describes a short man who builds a muscular body (i.e. "gym maxing") to compensate for his lack of height with the objective of garnering the interest if attractive women. "Jacked & Stacked" (Hardcore self-improvement coach) has a YouTube channel for manlets & normies. He's a manlet himself (5'7" 190lbs) and a MIT grad with a career field in engineer. So, you got a smart guy here:
My self-esteem, personality, charm, etc, is just fine. A single lady (divorced no kids) moved into my neighborhood about year & a half ago. She's a Stacey with beautiful blond hair, stunning blue eyes, 5'7" with a gorgeous body - a definite "9." She's an avid runner and also cross trains, so she joined the gym I'm at. I introduced myself welcoming to the neighborhood & we starting small talking at the common mailbox center down the street as well as at the gym at the times we would see each other there. Knowing that I was no way in her league - I asked her out anyway (one of those "what the heck moments" Lol). She said no of course, but offered a "friendzone" relationship. She told that I was personable, charming, funny & a real "nice" guy. So, for the next year or so, we hung out a couple of times per week in her free time going for drives, dinners or doing some cross training at the gym. We texted each other almost every other day. It was euphoric for a normie like me to be in the accompany of such a beautiful woman. 😍 I thought I died & went to heaven. Lol.
Well...after about year or so, that all came to a screeching halt when she met & fell in love with her "Chad." "Chad here was a 6'2" buffed guy with a six-pack, and an attorney by career - so he was a very high-value man (she also works in the law field but is not an attorney). Furthermore, she's now engage to the guy & we don't hang out anymore (her finance dosen't want her to) & we barely text each other anymore also. 😣
I don't blame her for falling for a "Chad" - genetics have been very good to her. She can get any good looking guy she wants - she's in very high demand from the Chad's. And as a normie, an ultra-short one at that, I simply didn't meet her looks threshold for anything else other than a good friendship (who would have thought. Lol.
It's difficult for most short "normies" to date attractive women. You've got to bring something else to the table in the form of either looks maxing, gym maxing, money maxing or status maxing or a combination of these. Personallty, charm, humor and all stuff sn't going to work by itself. It's not insurmountable but it takes a lot of work and LUCK.
Do people really use terms like "manosphere," "Chad," "normie," and "manlet" unironically? There are actually people who take this stuff seriously?
Posts like this are wild to me because it's like looking at another culture. I'm a pretty average guy in terms of looks, sociability, and income, but I've never had any trouble dating. Sure I've been rejected (who hasn't? it's not like we're entitled to date whoever we want whenever we want), but just being myself, being a good person, and taking interest in others and I've had as many dates/relationships with a lot of pretty cool women. Ended up marrying one. Don't understand at all the mentality on posts like this.
Some of those terms were used before the Manosphere & pre-internet with the terms being recycled as synonyms (e.g. "pretty boy" = Chad, "average Joe" = normie, "Fox" = Stacey, etc).
And who "takes this stuff seriously?" Well...millions of men of virtually all ages are following the Manasphere. I follow "Better Bachelor," one of the top Manosphere guys out there (378k subscribers!). I overwhelming agree with most of his content - the guy is spot on with the problem of declining relationships between men & women. Watch his video here before making any hasty judgments - what you are about to hear may shock you if you live in a blue pill world"
Fresh & Fit Miami on Tim Pool, meme's news and marriage stats prove it without a doubt.------Sources------My Brain-------To support my work --------Paypal Do...
Do people really use terms like "manosphere," "Chad," "normie," and "manlet" unironically? There are actually people who take this stuff seriously?
Posts like this are wild to me because it's like looking at another culture. I'm a pretty average guy in terms of looks, sociability, and income, but I've never had any trouble dating. Sure I've been rejected (who hasn't? it's not like we're entitled to date whoever we want whenever we want), but just being myself, being a good person, and taking interest in others and I've had as many dates/relationships with a lot of pretty cool women. Ended up marrying one. Don't understand at all the mentality on posts like this.
Some of those terms were used before the Manosphere & pre-internet with the terms being recycled as synonyms (e.g. "pretty boy" = Chad, "average Joe" = normie, "Fox" = Stacey, etc).
And who "takes this stuff seriously?" Well...millions of men of virtually all ages are following the Manasphere. I follow "Better Bachelor," one of the top Manosphere guys out there (378k subscribers!). I overwhelming agree with most of his content - the guy is spot on with the problem of declining relationships between men & women. Watch his video here before making any hasty judgments - what you are about to hear may shock you if you live in a blue pill world"
I’m a fan of Destiny. He’s been doing his best lately to meet you guys halfway. I think he makes good logical arguments against the incel ideology. I would maybe check him out if he hasn’t be thrust into your YouTube algo already.
I think men get very frustrated if the primary way they try to meet women is through dating apps. I tried it when I was single and I didn’t like the women I met - the attractive ones typically had entitlement issues and there were always women who used photos from years ago when they were far more attractive. But I was trying this in a big city, so maybe that was part of the problem.
I personally met much hotter and more attractive women in person than I ever did on a dating app where women tend to be far pickier and delusional. Men would be well-suited to learn how to talk to women in the real world. I don’t even necessarily mean learning how to hit on women - I mean just talking to them like a normal person. If you get comfortable enough talking to women you don’t know in the real world, you’ll start to learn when they actually are showing signs of interest. There are some very attractive women who don’t want to meet people on dating apps and many of them don’t get approached by decent men nearly as often as you would think…
Since those women probably feel the same way I guess that rules you out.
Typical narcissist behavior, putting the other one down. You never disappoint, Armstrong.
Poster brackish never said the feelings are not mutual, nor did (s)he complain about the situation.
This thread is nothing but a complaint about "the situation" - of men who can't attract women - who also feel entitled. You fail to see where the narcissism truly lies.
Of course appearance matters. But that’s clearly not your only problem. Your philosophy/outlook on life is also holding you back. Anyone who can off-the-cuff reference dozens of dumb “black pill” YouTube videos are demonstrating that they would have personality issues in connecting with women. It’s just more convenient to chalk it all up to physical attributes.
Reposted for emphasis. No one is saying that height/looks make no difference. We are saying there’s a lot more wrong with some of you.
A lot more wrong like what? Be specific & give some examples or you're just trolling.
Height & looks makes all the difference, especially height, when it comes to the genuine desire aspect of women. I'm a 5"5," average looking (at best), a gym-maxed guy in phenominal shape that is completely invisible to women, other than the unattractive overweight/obese ones. Lol. Being ultra-short at 5'5" just isn't going to cut it these days with most modern-day women.
If height wasn't paramount - then why are virtually all super-hero actors casted as tall guys? (Chris Hemsworth/Thor/6-3, Jason Momoa/Aquaman/6-4, Henry Cavill/Superman/6-1, Chris Evans/Captain America/6-0, etc,). Surely there must be shorter actors who would love to play these roles. I think you know the answer to this. 😉
Reposted for emphasis. No one is saying that height/looks make no difference. We are saying there’s a lot more wrong with some of you.
A lot more wrong like what? Be specific & give some examples or you're just trolling.
Like being obsessed with “manosphere” philosophy on dating, as I (and others) have specifically stated to you before. It is another strike, as is your apparent short memory/attention span.
Reposted for emphasis. No one is saying that height/looks make no difference. We are saying there’s a lot more wrong with some of you.
A lot more wrong like what? Be specific & give some examples or you're just trolling.
Height & looks makes all the difference, especially height, when it comes to the genuine desire aspect of women. I'm a 5"5," average looking (at best), a gym-maxed guy in phenominal shape that is completely invisible to women, other than the unattractive overweight/obese ones. Lol. Being ultra-short at 5'5" just isn't going to cut it these days with most modern-day women.
If height wasn't paramount - then why are virtually all super-hero actors casted as tall guys? (Chris Hemsworth/Thor/6-3, Jason Momoa/Aquaman/6-4, Henry Cavill/Superman/6-1, Chris Evans/Captain America/6-0, etc,). Surely there must be shorter actors who would love to play these roles. I think you know the answer to this. 😉
You don't need to look like Chris Hemsworth to get a girlfriend. And he married someone 7 years older than him. According to incels this is what a Chad doesn't do.
Reposted for emphasis. No one is saying that height/looks make no difference. We are saying there’s a lot more wrong with some of you.
A lot more wrong like what? Be specific & give some examples or you're just trolling.
Height & looks makes all the difference, especially height, when it comes to the genuine desire aspect of women. I'm a 5"5," average looking (at best), a gym-maxed guy in phenominal shape that is completely invisible to women, other than the unattractive overweight/obese ones. Lol. Being ultra-short at 5'5" just isn't going to cut it these days with most modern-day women.
If height wasn't paramount - then why are virtually all super-hero actors casted as tall guys? (Chris Hemsworth/Thor/6-3, Jason Momoa/Aquaman/6-4, Henry Cavill/Superman/6-1, Chris Evans/Captain America/6-0, etc,). Surely there must be shorter actors who would love to play these roles. I think you know the answer to this. 😉
A lot more wrong like what? Be specific & give some examples or you're just trolling.
Height & looks makes all the difference, especially height, when it comes to the genuine desire aspect of women. I'm a 5"5," average looking (at best), a gym-maxed guy in phenominal shape that is completely invisible to women, other than the unattractive overweight/obese ones. Lol. Being ultra-short at 5'5" just isn't going to cut it these days with most modern-day women.
If height wasn't paramount - then why are virtually all super-hero actors casted as tall guys? (Chris Hemsworth/Thor/6-3, Jason Momoa/Aquaman/6-4, Henry Cavill/Superman/6-1, Chris Evans/Captain America/6-0, etc,). Surely there must be shorter actors who would love to play these roles. I think you know the answer to this. 😉
You don't need to look like Chris Hemsworth to get a girlfriend. And he married someone 7 years older than him. According to incels this is what a Chad doesn't do.
What? You just made my point: Hemsworth's wife (Elsa Patakay) is super hot and...5'3!" Here you have a short woman going for a real tall guy. Have you seen their pics? He looks like a giant standing next to her.
If height wasn't paramount - then why are virtually all super-hero actors casted as tall guys?
Your lack of reading comprehension is definitely not helping your courting attempts.
I don't think so. And why don't you try answering the question as to why all super-hero actors are casted as 6 foot & over? I recall reading somewhere that Tom Cruise (5-6) was interested in playing one of those super-hero characters).
I find it ironic not one person here can answer a simply question I posed on the height of the super-hero actors. You thought you guys are so much smarter than me & know so much about dating. Instead all you do is deflect & criticize me for not having personality, charm, game & all that bs. Lol.
