Jeff Wigand wrote:
Sign away all your rights to a POS who doesn’t care about you at all. You’ll be like the North Koreans who gleefully accept the misery their god incarnate doles out to them.
Rights are overrated.
-
22
-
lofof73945@daxiake.com wrote:
Back to the topic of running up the deficit for Yachts for Multimillionaires.
Is this the main plank of the trump bill, as I am told?
The main part of the bill is to allow hardworking people to keep more of the money they earn.
04 -
Noyankee wrote:
BillionairesForHire wrote:
Is it possible that every president that preceeded Trump just didn’t realize they had kingly powers? Or is it more likely that all of them understood the constraints of the Constitution and the law? Courts ruling against the Trump admin 90%+ would suggest the latter. Previous presidents and administrations would be embarrassed by losing this much. No knowledge and no shame is a bad combination.
Not for nothing, but you guys do understand that you are part of a smaller and smaller minority group in this country, yes?
In other words, you are the fringe group. We will try to do what we can for you, when we can, but there are Hispanics and others that we must listen to first.
You didn't address anything in my post. Also, Trump won with a 1% larger minority than Harris, but both were a minority vote. Currently the majority disapproves of Trump / maga.
40 -
25
-
15
-
This post was edited 23 seconds after it was posted.37
-
BillionairesForHire wrote:
Noyankee wrote:
Not for nothing, but you guys do understand that you are part of a smaller and smaller minority group in this country, yes?
In other words, you are the fringe group. We will try to do what we can for you, when we can, but there are Hispanics and others that we must listen to first.
You didn't address anything in my post. Also, Trump won with a 1% larger minority than Harris, but both were a minority vote. Currently the majority disapproves of Trump / maga.
Incorrect!
Best ever poll for Trump from Rasmussen.
Cry more.
24 -
Please run Kamala again!
12 -
Trump (Jr) 2028 wrote:
The court blocked the tariffs Trump issued pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. IEEPA does not authorize the president to levy tariffs. It allows the president to declare an emergency and freeze assets, confiscate property and block transactions. Jimmy Carter used it to respond to Iran by implementing sanctions under the Act. As the court noted, there are a number of statutes that have expressly delegated the tariff authority to the president under certain conditions. IEEPA simply has no language in it that gives the president the power under the act to implement tariffs.
51 -
Women for Trump \' wrote:
A fearless warrior fighting for freedom.
More homoerotic fetish Trump worship cartoons for magats to spend "alone time" viewing.
32 -
32
-
BillionairesForHire wrote:
Women for Trump \' wrote:
A fearless warrior fighting for freedom.
More homoerotic fetish Trump worship cartoons for magats to spend "alone time" viewing.
Good luck. Fat chicks to the rescue!
22 -
Precious Roy wrote:
Trump (Jr) 2028 wrote:
The court blocked the tariffs Trump issued pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. IEEPA does not authorize the president to levy tariffs. It allows the president to declare an emergency and freeze assets, confiscate property and block transactions. Jimmy Carter used it to respond to Iran by implementing sanctions under the Act. As the court noted, there are a number of statutes that have expressly delegated the tariff authority to the president under certain conditions. IEEPA simply has no language in it that gives the president the power under the act to implement tariffs.
Appeals court has overturned.
Activist judges lose.
Trump wins again.
This post was edited 40 seconds after it was posted.12 -
Protip: don't take conlaw advice from right wing trolls on twitter.
31 -
not over turned per se... a stay was issued.
10 -
TARRIFFS BACK ON...
CORRUPT ACTIVIST DEMOCRAT JUDGES SLAPPED DOWN BY HIGHER COURT..
JUDGES SLINK BACK UNDER THEIR ROCKS WITH TAILS BETWEEN THEIR LEGS...
24 -
Trump (Jr) 2028 wrote:
A district court judge does not supersede the President, Congress, and SCOTUS.
This determination about the tariffs was not by a district court judge but was a unanimous decision by three judges on the U.S. Court of International Trade: one a Reagan appointee, one appointed by President Trump.
10 -
exrunnerboy,,, wrote:
TARRIFFS BACK ON...
CORRUPT ACTIVIST DEMOCRAT JUDGES SLAPPED DOWN BY HIGHER COURT..
JUDGES SLINK BACK UNDER THEIR ROCKS WITH TAILS BETWEEN THEIR LEGS...
Of the three judges who made that unanimous decision, one was appointed by Reagan and one by President Trump.
Also, you don't have to use ALL CAPITALS. Get a young person to show you. (At the same time, s/he can show you how to spell "tariffs.")
This post was edited 23 seconds after it was posted.10 -
11
-
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
BillionairesForHire wrote:
More homoerotic fetish Trump worship cartoons for magats to spend "alone time" viewing.
Good luck. Fat chicks to the rescue!
You are really obsessed with "fat chicks". Probably explains your homoerotic fetish for Trump.
40
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.