Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Flagpole wrote:

get over it wrote:

He is not a operating in the capacity of a private person. The court is correct. Trump is wrong. The USA is not a fascist country run by a dictator. If Trump want to be a private person he can quit the job. Then he can ban who he wishes.

EXACTLY! Come on DG...throw us a bone at least once in a while that you have any sense at all.

So they ruled that the digital space is a public forum, therefore Trump can not block people from his twitter account, but twitter and FB can shadow ban conservatives in the same public forum without consequence? It makes no legal sense.

Also, are they saying ANYONE who works for the government can't block users on twitter? Its petty for Trump to block users, and its petty for the court to rule that he can't. The bigger problem is the courts using the bench for petty retribution.

Nice! Good to see old DG get some sarcasm and parody thrown at him. The things. He says. Are unbelievable!

Flagpole wrote:

...

Well, to be fair, if the FBI, under the direction of Obama, for political purposes, put a spy or spies into the Trump campaign for any reason, that would matter a lot.

...

How did I know that the one guy who seemed the farthest gone, would be the only one here who could see the danger in this?

DiscoGary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

...

Well, to be fair, if the FBI, under the direction of Obama, for political purposes, put a spy or spies into the Trump campaign for any reason, that would matter a lot.

...

How did I know that the one guy who seemed the farthest gone, would be the only one here who could see the danger in this?

but they didn't put spies into the trump campaign, you shameless liar

ChiTown Terp wrote:

No win? wrote:

Is it not a win?

Unfortunately, it is a win.

If he had his clearence back and he was at the meeting at Trump Towers with the Russians, does this mean Yhe meeting is a nothing burger in the eyes of the investigation?

+1

No way he gets it if Mueller thinks there is anything to trump tower meeting.

Pluser of ones wrote:

ChiTown Terp wrote:

Unfortunately, it is a win.

If he had his clearence back and he was at the meeting at Trump Towers with the Russians, does this mean Yhe meeting is a nothing burger in the eyes of the investigation?

+1

No way he gets it if Mueller thinks there is anything to trump tower meeting.

who cares - they're all going to jail for tax evasion - every last kushner, every last trump, every last hanger on

PIO! wrote:

HAVING THE GOVERNMENT SPYING ON ITS CITIZENS AND/OR ORGANIZATIONS IS AN ORWELLIAN NIGHTMARE AND ONE OF THE FOUNDATIONS OF A TOTALITARIAN STATE.

Any questions?

Yeah, when DIDN'T the government spy on its citizens?

Enough with the false claims about Trump's campaign having spies. It's a materially false claim. Nunes' own memo explains it.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

PIO! wrote:

HAVING THE GOVERNMENT SPYING ON ITS CITIZENS AND/OR ORGANIZATIONS IS AN ORWELLIAN NIGHTMARE AND ONE OF THE FOUNDATIONS OF A TOTALITARIAN STATE.

Any questions?

Yeah, when DIDN'T the government spy on its citizens?

Enough with the false claims about Trump's campaign having spies. It's a materially false claim. Nunes' own memo explains it.

almost every right wing pundit, even on respectable sites like National Review, is going with the 'spies in the trump campaign' line. Shocking how easy it was for the moron in chief to turn them.

before trump, just the fear of being called a liar prevented people from wholesale fabrication.

now, after trump, people like Gary don't care if they lie every day - they've been taught by the crook in chief that lying is just another way to be.

traitors.

blahgovich wrote:

Pluser of ones wrote:

+1

No way he gets it if Mueller thinks there is anything to trump tower meeting.

who cares - they're all going to jail for tax evasion - every last kushner, every last trump, every last hanger on

The "win" for Trump was Kushner's security clearance was granted the FBI. What happens now to all of those FBI attacks by Trump, Fox News, Breitbart, Trump's lackey's, and the Trumpsters? Is the FBI bad? Or is it good?

1. No spy was placed in Trump's campaign and the informant you refer to was not sent by Obama.

2. Given the intel Obama had at the time and what we all know about Trump's previous dealings, I believe it would have been completely warranted for him to ask someone to look into the activities of the Trump campaign. But guess what? he didn't do that. He didn't help his sister Hillary out with that one (a well-known complaint by HRC).

So you are completely wrong in your assertion to begin with. Do I see a problem with abuse of power? Heck yes, that's why I want Trump out!

You call libs sheeple, but the fact that you simpletons can't differentiate between an informant and spy and opinion vs news makes you completely susceptible to being duped on a daily basis. You tell us to do some homework yet you don't bother to follow up to corroborate information on a single tweet. Sorry, we can't help you!

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

PIO! wrote:

HAVING THE GOVERNMENT SPYING ON ITS CITIZENS AND/OR ORGANIZATIONS IS AN ORWELLIAN NIGHTMARE AND ONE OF THE FOUNDATIONS OF A TOTALITARIAN STATE.

Any questions?

Yeah, when DIDN'T the government spy on its citizens?

Enough with the false claims about Trump's campaign having spies. It's a materially false claim. Nunes' own memo explains it.

No kidding. How soon we forget the spying on citizen scandal during the Obama administration.

adroitly transcendent wrote:

Timothy Foyle wrote:

That's right! That's right!!!

Finally someone gets it!

It's a conspiracy! Run for your lives! Save yourselves!!!

Nice! Good to see old DG get some sarcasm and parody thrown at him. The things. He says. Are unbelievable!

Indeed the things I say are hard to believe, but true nonetheless.

Understanding is easy.

Believing is hard.

-- DiscoGary

Flagpole understands the danger, he just can't get himself to believe that his guys are that corrupt. Who would want to?

The difference between us is that I've been able to believe the horrible things that I've known about for so long. For example, for a long time I KNEW that Republicans didn't represent me, that they lied to get into power and then stabbed me in the back in DC ... but I couldn't get myself to BELIEVE it, to live it, until Bush did the bailouts at the end of his presidency. Then the switch flipped and everything that I understood finally got absorbed into my world view. I finally believed my own eyes and trusted my own knowledge. I escaped the Establishment Republican Rat Maze so I know how hard that is to do.

The problem is that I don't see any liberals engaging in ANY self doubt or any introspection. There's NO attempt to adjust their world view based on new information. Without that process, you will be stuck in the Liberal Media Rat Maze forever, blaming others for the failures of your leaders. Its not a good way to go through life.

Trump's Deep State wrote:

blahgovich wrote:

who cares - they're all going to jail for tax evasion - every last kushner, every last trump, every last hanger on

The "win" for Trump was Kushner's security clearance was granted the FBI. What happens now to all of those FBI attacks by Trump, Fox News, Breitbart, Trump's lackey's, and the Trumpsters? Is the FBI bad? Or is it good?

Why does it have to be either or? The fact that he got clearence demonstrates a lot.

DiscoGary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

EXACTLY! Come on DG...throw us a bone at least once in a while that you have any sense at all.

So they ruled that the digital space is a public forum, therefore Trump can not block people from his twitter account, but twitter and FB can shadow ban conservatives in the same public forum without consequence? It makes no legal sense.

Also, are they saying ANYONE who works for the government can't block users on twitter? Its petty for Trump to block users, and its petty for the court to rule that he can't. The bigger problem is the courts using the bench for petty retribution.

The court has ruled, and the decision is correct. Trump is the President of the United States, not a private citizen. You are for him being able to silence anyone who doesn't agree with him.

Have fun, George.

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/05/collusion-happened/560894/

blahgovich wrote:

before trump, just the fear of being called a liar prevented people from wholesale fabrication.

now, after trump, people like Gary don't care if they lie every day - they've been taught by the crook in chief that lying is just another way to be.

traitors.

And you would think after this string of posts calling out his lie on the spy thing, that Gary would finally look it up. Gary has no credibility talking about a liberal rat maze when he blatantly believes every little tweet from his dear leader that have been completely debunked.

Facts is facts wrote:

Trump's Deep State wrote:

The "win" for Trump was Kushner's security clearance was granted the FBI. What happens now to all of those FBI attacks by Trump, Fox News, Breitbart, Trump's lackey's, and the Trumpsters? Is the FBI bad? Or is it good?

Why does it have to be either or? The fact that he got clearence demonstrates a lot.

Either? For that to be true then the two sides of a Trump coin are either always heads or always tails. Depending on what you decide the "truth" is beforehand. Trump is both a liar and a saint. Trump is both a criminal and a saint. Trump has always cheated on his wives and has only had sex to have five kids. Trump's hair is both fake and real. Trump is the sickliest president ever and the healthiest.

Trollminator wrote:

blahgovich wrote:

before trump, just the fear of being called a liar prevented people from wholesale fabrication.

now, after trump, people like Gary don't care if they lie every day - they've been taught by the crook in chief that lying is just another way to be.

traitors.

And you would think after this string of posts calling out his lie on the spy thing, that Gary would finally look it up. Gary has no credibility talking about a liberal rat maze when he blatantly believes every little tweet from his dear leader that have been completely debunked.

If Bush had planted spies in Obamas campaign to find out what influence Kenya had on him, would you have been OK with that?