I will be working on a large scale United States Advertising Campaign, explaining how bad Fentanyl is for people to use - Millions of lives being so needlessly destroyed. By the time the Campaign is over, everyone will know how really bad the horror of this Drug is.
-
22
-
6 blahs wrote:
And it took her only 24 hours to get the delegates she needed to secure the nomination. We are unified, we are motivated, and we are going to beat M*GA like a drum, this fall.
Lol
21 -
Trump 45 47 - wrote:
I will be working on a large scale United States Advertising Campaign, explaining how bad Fentanyl is for people to use - Millions of lives being so needlessly destroyed. By the time the Campaign is over, everyone will know how really bad the horror of this Drug is.
Everyone already knows. Fentanyl users know the obvious risks. We don't doubt your deep and sincere concern for druggies, but the large scale advertising campaign seems kind of pointless and a waste of resources. Everyone already knows this stuff.
01 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Ghost of ER wrote:
How the hell do I know? Who am I, Billy fvcking Graham over here? I read my Bible, I gather with those in true worship, I keep the Sabbath, I pray for those deserving of prayers, and I'm an armed warrior for Christ. I do everything Jesus expects. I'm not some distinguished Presbyterian theologian scholar who can address all your skeptical hypotheticals.
I probably could, yes. But I'm extremely busy man, and I don't have time this trivial sh!t.
Are you denying that MAG@ policy is to negotiate with Islamic terrorists who kill innocent Americans? Are you seriously denying that as a vested MAG@?
As a famous latter-day Anglo-Christian once said "It's not easy facing up when your whole world in black."
You are extremely busy but have time to be on this lame run chat room?
Whoah. Are you saying you're somehow busier than me? I have business, legal and ecclesiastical obligations and relationships with hundreds of successful high-IQ Americans from coast to coast. You, on the other hand, reek of semi-employed, bitter servility. You have squandered every opportunity that American society handed to you on a platter. To be perfectly honest, I think your IQ is in the mid-90s. No one, and I mean NO ONE, in that failed demographic is busy.
01 -
Ivyguy wrote:
Mask off wrote:
Your parents . . . don't want their tax dollars spent oninmate's [sic] sex change surgeries?
Well, too bad. That's where tax $ went UNDER TRUMP.
No. Try reading your own crap.
"As of today, only two transgender inmates in federal custody have received gender-affirming surgeries following lengthy court battles. The first surgery was in 2022 and the second was in 2023, both after Trump left office."
31 -
Flagpole wrote:
Well, I've been fishing a lot. I've been spending a lot of time outside...you know, since I'm retired and all.
The other reason that you asked that question is that this thread isn't currently interesting, so I haven't spent a lot of time here. Kamala Harris IS going to win...and it's not going to be all that close. I maintain she wins in the range of 303-319 EC votes, and there's a greater chance that she will get MORE EC votes than the top of that range than she loses.
You mock the 13 Keys at your peril. Harris is going to win. It's over. Get your blankie and hot cocoa ready.
13 keys?
41 -
02
-
“Brant copped to leasing land to some dudes who grew marijuana they sold in Ohio, in violation of federal law.”
No big deal
22 -
22
-
Another example wrote:
Newname wrote:
Crushed the Electoral College despite Dems spending over $1 billion and nearly all of the media slamming Trump and praising Harris 24/7. Took the Senate. Expanded margin in the House.
That's a mandate
Meh. 6 more EC votes than Biden’s 2020 win and less than both Obama and Clinton wins is hardly “crushing”. Nor is a ~1.5% popular vote spread.
312 to 226. Not a mandate?
Senate. Dems had 51 to 49 going in. GOP now has a 53 to 47 lead.
House: GOP had 222 seats going in vs. 213 for the Dems. Now its 220 to 214 with one still not called.
42 -
Ghost of ER wrote:
Newname wrote:
1. Why did Xianity become Judeo-Xianity recently?
How the hell do I know? Who am I, Billy fvcking Graham over here? I read my Bible, I gather with those in true worship, I keep the Sabbath, I pray for those deserving of prayers, and I'm an armed warrior for Christ. I do everything Jesus expects. I'm not some distinguished Presbyterian theologian scholar who can address all your skeptical hypotheticals.
Newman wrote:
2. I have never once seen the term Judeo-Islam. Maybe you can show me a newspaper or tv show or magazine or anything where this appeared?I probably could, yes. But I'm extremely busy man, and I don't have time this trivial sh!t.
3. Newman wrote: I'm a MAG@ and I believe in negotiating with Islamic terrorists who kill innocent Americans. I never wrote that statement. How dishonest of you. And pathetic. I am not MAG@ and do not support the killing of innocent Americans -- something Israel gets away with all the timeAre you denying that MAG@ policy is to negotiate with Islamic terrorists who kill innocent Americans? Are you seriously denying that as a vested MAG@?
As a famous latter-day Anglo-Christian once said "It's not easy facing up when your whole world in black."
Classic. Can't answer the 1st question. Claim you can provide examples for the second but just don't have the time. Third -- fail to acknowledge you made up something that you claimed I said and then made up more lies.
21 -
Another example wrote:
Newname wrote:
Crushed the Electoral College despite Dems spending over $1 billion and nearly all of the media slamming Trump and praising Harris 24/7. Took the Senate. Expanded margin in the House.
That's a mandate
Meh. 6 more EC votes than Biden’s 2020 win and less than both Obama and Clinton wins is hardly “crushing”. Nor is a ~1.5% popular vote spread.
Meh. You are wrong. He cruuuuuuushed it. Cope and cry harder little guy. If he lost the Popular vote, that would be your argument. He wins and you cry like a sissy. Cope and cry harder little guy.
32 -
Newname wrote:
312 to 226. Not a mandate?
Senate. Dems had 51 to 49 going in. GOP now has a 53 to 47 lead.
House: GOP had 222 seats going in vs. 213 for the Dems. Now it’s 220 to 214 with one still not called.
A couple of late-called races seem rife with fraud. Look at California. Michelle Steel should have won handily yet allegedly lost.
22 -
Newname wrote:
Another example wrote:
Meh. 6 more EC votes than Biden’s 2020 win and less than both Obama and Clinton wins is hardly “crushing”. Nor is a ~1.5% popular vote spread.
312 to 226. Not a mandate?
Senate. Dems had 51 to 49 going in. GOP now has a 53 to 47 lead.
House: GOP had 222 seats going in vs. 213 for the Dems. Now its 220 to 214 with one still not called.
No, not a mandate.
Trump didn't win the popular vote. His margin of victory was tiny.
His electoral college win looks good but is small compared to previous "change" elections.
Yes, Dems lost Senate seats, but they won 4 of 5 of the races in the battleground states. The seats they lost were in states that a Dem wasn't going to win anyway (WV, for example).
The House is basically the same.
He'll govern as if he has a mandate, going too far, and likely lose the House in the midterms. The Senate 2026 map isn't great for Democrats, though, so even if he does a poor job (as expected), he'll likely keep the Senate.
05 -
Nancy B. wrote:
Newname wrote:
312 to 226. Not a mandate?
Senate. Dems had 51 to 49 going in. GOP now has a 53 to 47 lead.
House: GOP had 222 seats going in vs. 213 for the Dems. Now its 220 to 214 with one still not called.
No, not a mandate.
Trump didn't win the popular vote. His margin of victory was tiny.
His electoral college win looks good but is small compared to previous "change" elections.
Yes, Dems lost Senate seats, but they won 4 of 5 of the races in the battleground states. The seats they lost were in states that a Dem wasn't going to win anyway (WV, for example).
The House is basically the same.
He'll govern as if he has a mandate, going too far, and likely lose the House in the midterms. The Senate 2026 map isn't great for Democrats, though, so even if he does a poor job (as expected), he'll likely keep the Senate.
False. Trump won the popular vote.
His EC win doesn't just look good, it IS good.
You forget Nancy Nancy, he was suppose to lose Michigan, PA, Wisconsin, Georgia, NC, etc...
Keep trying to rationalize things to make yourself feel better because that's all it's doing.
Keep supporting the liberal BS, they'll lose even more in 2028...wait for it.
You're so dumb that you probably supported Biden shutting down the pipeline on day 1 in Office, right? Some of you are an embarrassment to the Country. Nancy, move, we don't need ya here.
50 -
Trump 45 47 - wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Well, I've been fishing a lot. I've been spending a lot of time outside...you know, since I'm retired and all.
The other reason that you asked that question is that this thread isn't currently interesting, so I haven't spent a lot of time here. Kamala Harris IS going to win...and it's not going to be all that close. I maintain she wins in the range of 303-319 EC votes, and there's a greater chance that she will get MORE EC votes than the top of that range than she loses.
You mock the 13 Keys at your peril. Harris is going to win. It's over. Get your blankie and hot cocoa ready.
13 keys?
Yeah.
THat moron Lichtman who claimed he could determine who will win based on an arbitrary set of 13 keys he made up. Massively hyped by the MSM and touted as having accurately picked 9 of last 10 presidential races (which is not that amazing if you go back and look at them). He picked Kamala. And now refuses to admit his system was wrong!
42 -
31
-
Equation= wrote:
Nancy B. wrote:
No, not a mandate.
Trump didn't win the popular vote. His margin of victory was tiny.
His electoral college win looks good but is small compared to previous "change" elections.
Yes, Dems lost Senate seats, but they won 4 of 5 of the races in the battleground states. The seats they lost were in states that a Dem wasn't going to win anyway (WV, for example).
The House is basically the same.
He'll govern as if he has a mandate, going too far, and likely lose the House in the midterms. The Senate 2026 map isn't great for Democrats, though, so even if he does a poor job (as expected), he'll likely keep the Senate.
False. Trump won the popular vote.
His EC win doesn't just look good, it IS good.
You forget Nancy Nancy, he was suppose to lose Michigan, PA, Wisconsin, Georgia, NC, etc...
Keep trying to rationalize things to make yourself feel better because that's all it's doing.
Keep supporting the liberal BS, they'll lose even more in 2028...wait for it.
You're so dumb that you probably supported Biden shutting down the pipeline on day 1 in Office, right? Some of you are an embarrassment to the Country. Nancy, move, we don't need ya here.
Oops, I meant to say he didn't get to 50% of the popular vote. Meaning more people voted against him than for him.
Trump was not "supposed to lose" the battleground states. They were all polling within the margin of error (that's why they call them battlegrounds, my friend).
What's with you and your fascination with "the pipeline"? Are you talking about Keystone XL, which wasn't even in operation?
13 -
20
-
Newname wrote:
Ghost of ER wrote:
How the hell do I know? Who am I, Billy fvcking Graham over here? I read my Bible, I gather with those in true worship, I keep the Sabbath, I pray for those deserving of prayers, and I'm an armed warrior for Christ. I do everything Jesus expects. I'm not some distinguished Presbyterian theologian scholar who can address all your skeptical hypotheticals.
I probably could, yes. But I'm extremely busy man, and I don't have time this trivial sh!t.
Are you denying that MAG@ policy is to negotiate with Islamic terrorists who kill innocent Americans? Are you seriously denying that as a vested MAG@?
As a famous latter-day Anglo-Christian once said "It's not easy facing up when your whole world in black."
Classic. Can't answer the 1st question. Claim you can provide examples for the second but just don't have the time. Third -- fail to acknowledge you made up something that you claimed I said and then made up more lies.
Why do you hate Judeo-Christians? I mean the real ones, not the fake ones you see here. Why do you hate the real ones?
Are you one of them Hezzbollicalists? You certainly post like one. I strongly suspect you are one. I'll bet you are a Judeo-Islamic Hezzbollicalist. We got you sussued. We got you pegged. Ferreted out.
02
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.