Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

DiscoGary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

...

I have already said if Trump is found innocent that I will say so and say he is not a criminal.

...

Well, your recent history suggests that you will never accept a Trump exoneration. You were certain Trump would lose. After he won, you refused to accept his victory because you are holding out hope that he cheated, which would then magically make you right again! So if they can not find cheating, we can assume that you will take the stance that he obstructed justice, which if true would magically make you right again! You are already way beyond the wackiest Birther as far as conspiracy stuff goes. My prediction is that you will never accept Trump as President. In your mind you will always be right... in your mind.

1) My history shows nothing of the sort.

2) I absolutely accepted his victory and still do today. He won and as of today, I was wrong about that. I have said that many times now.

3) I can't "magically" be made right. I WILL be right about the 2016 election if cheating by Trump and/or his campaign or associates is proven. I put that out before the election as a condition. I believe it WILL be proven, but as of now I remain wrong.

4) I will only say he obstructed justice if that is indeed proven. If he obstructed justice but it wasn't proven that he cheated with regard to the 2016 election, then I will remain wrong about the 2016 election but will be right that Trump would be charged with certain crimes...I have listed among them as obstruction of justice, money laundering, perjury (if he ever talks officially to anyone), collusion (in the form of conspiracy or bribery) and some other less serious crimes. I will only state that I was right if proven right.

5) I am a very strong Law and Order person. If this goes through the process and he is found innocent, I will say he is innocent. As of today, I accept that he fairly won the Presidency and that he is the legitimate President. If Mueller's investigation proves otherwise, then I will not accept him, and that is only if Mueller's findings lead to his ouster.

I have 100% integrity and always have. Your assertions about me are baseless. I will be proven right, but if not, I will admit that I was wrong. You might not be that kind of person and so can not imagine that someone is that way, but I am. I ALWAYS admit when I am wrong with no backpedaling ever.

That said...

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Noticer of baloney wrote:

Hardloper was not good enough to run anywhere. And jamin never ran on a high school or college team. They had no role models to emulate on teams that might have made them turn out better than they did. So this partially explains their deep allegiance to Trump. You'll also find mal-mo's footprints all over this and some randoms. All post links to disreputable sites with disproved stories and stand by their false claims. All of this is because they are too soft to admit they are wrong.

M-mo posts a lot on this thread. Most are just troll posts to boost the hits (ad income for the bros).

Flagpole wrote:

...

3) I can't "magically" be made right. I WILL be right about the 2016 election if cheating by Trump and/or his campaign or associates is proven.

...

Flagpole old buddy. Just know this. I would help you if I could.

You just keep the faith until I can figure out how to get you out of that maze.

DiscoGary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

...

3) I can't "magically" be made right. I WILL be right about the 2016 election if cheating by Trump and/or his campaign or associates is proven.

...

Flagpole old buddy. Just know this. I would help you if I could.

You just keep the faith until I can figure out how to get you out of that maze.

You are parma-trapped, wearing Trump blinders, in a Trump Rat Maze that has no exit - there is a Trump wall around it that has no doors. You are not qualified to help anyone.

DiscoGary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

...

3) I can't "magically" be made right. I WILL be right about the 2016 election if cheating by Trump and/or his campaign or associates is proven.

...

Flagpole old buddy. Just know this. I would help you if I could.

You just keep the faith until I can figure out how to get you out of that maze.

I need no faith. My prediction is based on what we know already, seeing Trump's behavior and his staff's ever-changing position and behavior.

Trump will be shown to the world to be a criminal, and The United States will receive back some dignity though it will take at least a Presidential cycle of one scandal-free president (see Barack Obama) to get back what we've lost.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Trump Rat Maze wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Flagpole old buddy. Just know this. I would help you if I could.

You just keep the faith until I can figure out how to get you out of that maze.

You are parma-trapped, wearing Trump blinders, in a Trump Rat Maze that has no exit - there is a Trump wall around it that has no doors. You are not qualified to help anyone.

... and you could be right! But my Trump maze is consistent with reality. I don't have to constantly blame other people for the failure of my preferred policies the way that liberals do. In my Trump maze world I can make predictions that usually come true. The Liberal Media Rat Maze has no relation to reality, all your predictions are worthless, and everyone in it has to constantly be fed a stream of lies to explain why liberal policies don't work.

It's possible that I'm being fooled but I can say with absolute certainty the denizens of the Liberal Media Rat Maze are being fooled.

Re: " I fact, I just added a new one there...that Manafort will plead guilty within weeks. I have never said that before."

This could use some clarification. Any time period can be measured in weeks. The question is how many weeks?

If M has not pled guilty (or been pardoned) within 5 weeks will you admit to being incorrect on this one? 10 weeks? . . .

Please clarify for the score keepers on here.

/ / /

For the record the current score is:

Flagpole: 783

Lying Gary/HL/Jamn/... : 0

Flagpole wrote:

...

I need no faith.

...

I have had many debates with many people on many different topics, and debating politics with you is exactly the same as debating religion with a fundamentalist. But you keep the faith and hold your sanity together. I'm out here with the blow torches and drilling machines trying to get you out of the maze. I'm not giving up!

DiscoGary wrote:

I finally mangled a post bad enough to repost it:

Meanwhile in the real world we have confirmed that Obama had an FBI spy in Trump's campaign. That alone is worse than anything Nixon ever did but it could be much worser. There are stories out there that the spy was used to plant the email scandal in the Trump campaign so that further surveillance could be justified. This is banana republic, police state stuff. Really, REALLY bad stuff. Obama's abuse of national intelligence resources is where the real investigation should be happening. I'm not holding my breath. Even now, no one wants to go after Obama because they don't want to be called a racist, but his administration did this. He owns it.

All truths sourced from the Trump Swampland. You were fed “spy” so you believe “spy”

DiscoGary wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

...

I need no faith.

...

I have had many debates with many people on many different topics, and debating politics with you is exactly the same as debating religion with a fundamentalist. But you keep the faith and hold your sanity together. I'm out here with the blow torches and drilling machines trying to get you out of the maze. I'm not giving up!

You are the most dishonest person and the most prolific liar on all of LRC. This is a fact.

If you criticize the White House for officially using the word "animals" to describe human beings over and over and over again, then you must be sympathetic to violent gangs. That's the game the fascists are playing here. We all know their disproportionate fixation on MS-13 is symbolic for their crusade against illegal immigration generally. We all know that the "animal" designation applies to a broader population than just MS-13 members in the minds of Trump supporters. Just one more baby step down the road to authoritarianism. We've taken so many already...

PIO! wrote:

Re: " I fact, I just added a new one there...that Manafort will plead guilty within weeks. I have never said that before."

This could use some clarification. Any time period can be measured in weeks. The question is how many weeks?

If M has not pled guilty (or been pardoned) within 5 weeks will you admit to being incorrect on this one? 10 weeks? . . .

Please clarify for the score keepers on here.

/ / /

For the record the current score is:

Flagpole: 783

Lying Gary/HL/Jamn/... : 0

Good Point. I would be surprised if he doesn't plead guilty by the end of July, so by end of July.

Flagpole wrote:

PIO! wrote:

Re: " I fact, I just added a new one there...that Manafort will plead guilty within weeks. I have never said that before."

This could use some clarification. Any time period can be measured in weeks. The question is how many weeks?

If M has not pled guilty (or been pardoned) within 5 weeks will you admit to being incorrect on this one? 10 weeks? . . .

Please clarify for the score keepers on here.

/ / /

For the record the current score is:

Flagpole: 783

Lying Gary/HL/Jamn/... : 0

Good Point. I would be surprised if he doesn't plead guilty by the end of July, so by end of July.

It is very likely will soon quit the 'thankless' job. He already accept a $500M bribe from China to build a Trump resort in Asia, and he is accepting a $1B bribe to bail of the Kushner 666 building. His criminal work is done.

Flagpole wrote:

PIO! wrote:

Re: " I fact, I just added a new one there...that Manafort will plead guilty within weeks. I have never said that before."

This could use some clarification. Any time period can be measured in weeks. The question is how many weeks?

If M has not pled guilty (or been pardoned) within 5 weeks will you admit to being incorrect on this one? 10 weeks? . . .

Please clarify for the score keepers on here.

/ / /

For the record the current score is:

Flagpole: 783

Lying Gary/HL/Jamn/... : 0

Good Point. I would be surprised if he doesn't plead guilty by the end of July, so by end of July.

Guilty to what (just so we are clear)?

Gutless wrote:

Guilty to what (just so we are clear)?

To be clear, you are a weak troll, HardLoper.

That's right Magat-hats. Trump colluded with MOOslims to undermine America. Prepare for your heads to explode.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ap-investigation-how-two-men-leveraged-access-to-trump-and-persian-gulf-crown-princes-into-millions-of-dollars/2018/05/21/f3128126-5d33-11e8-b656-236c6214ef01_story.html?utm_term=.3baa4af94c84

He's weak in general. 1:25 half marathon PR? Hahaha.

2b clear wrote:

To be clear, you are a weak troll, HardLoper.

Flagpole wrote:

PIO! wrote:

Re: " I fact, I just added a new one there...that Manafort will plead guilty within weeks. I have never said that before."

This could use some clarification. Any time period can be measured in weeks. The question is how many weeks?

If M has not pled guilty (or been pardoned) within 5 weeks will you admit to being incorrect on this one? 10 weeks? . . .

Please clarify for the score keepers on here.

/ / /

For the record the current score is:

Flagpole: 783

Lying Gary/HL/Jamn/... : 0

Good Point. I would be surprised if he doesn't plead guilty by the end of July, so by end of July.

What will his punishment be?

The punisher x wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

Good Point. I would be surprised if he doesn't plead guilty by the end of July, so by end of July.

What will his punishment be?

A padded cell.