Sandra Vi going for record across America

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

Discuss with Strava wrote:

It is time for Strava to hack-proof their data.

Gary on URC just said the same thing on the URC thread:

Gary Kiernan

Interesting that it can be done though, I guess that's something Strava better get onto or everyone is going to be claiming 12 hr 100 mile times

Unfortunately, there is no real way to prevent this kind of spoofing short of building tamper proof hardware encryption chips into GPS watches that digitally sign the data.

Maybe that should be done for record setting purposes. Especially, records where independent witnesses the entire time are not feasible.

Mimi's Relay wrote:

They are odd. I have looked through Sandy's Garmin data, and Pete's. They only occur for Mimi. They are not random. A simple point-by-point data plot would make them more obvious. If you have ever done regression analysis (data smoothing) these are data points you would not just throw out. Their semi-regularity is enough to tell you to figure out why they are occurring. That is nothing more than the scientific method. If you were publishing the data set in a scientific report you would get butchered if you did not provided an explanation.

It would be interesting to see if we could download GPX files off the Garmin tracker site and upload them to Strava and compare it with Mimi's postings.

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

It would be interesting to see if we could download GPX files off the Garmin tracker site and upload them to Strava and compare it with Mimi's postings.

Mimi changed how she was she is running the Garmin data. It was daily postings. Now it is start to end of the entire race data. When she had daily Garmin it was easy enough to see that the length of time of a run according to Garmin was longer than it was according to Strava.

For example: Mimi Sep 29

GARMIN: 31.51 miles, 7:33:45 time, 4.17 mph average (Max Speed 51.5 mph, data brain-fart?)

STRAVA: 32.4 miles, 6:54:04 time, 12.45/mile

Mimi and/or her team has deliberately obfuscated the data yet again.

Why?

Scam_Watcheroo I agree with you and the others that releasing your source code is not a good idea, nor is it necessary. The Mimi fans won't believe it no matter what. No good will come of it.

Also, Ross's posts were on one of Mimi's Facebook accounts, not on the URC board. Just wanted to clear that up as I don't know if URC is banning people for questioning Mimi or not.

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

Discuss with Strava wrote:

It is time for Strava to hack-proof their data.

Gary on URC just said the same thing on the URC thread:

Gary Kiernan

Interesting that it can be done though, I guess that's something Strava better get onto or everyone is going to be claiming 12 hr 100 mile times

Unfortunately, there is no real way to prevent this kind of spoofing short of building tamper proof hardware encryption chips into GPS watches that digitally sign the data.

Gary fake name Kienan/Dalton knows absolutely nothing about tech, and why does he feel the need to comment obsessively about Mimi fake name when he has nothing to add to the discussion?

All he is good for is assuming people are using fake names, with no evidence, then banning them. He represents how URC works - bunch of deluded fanboy idiots.

.[/quote]

Gary fake name Kienan/Dalton knows absolutely nothing about tech, and why does he feel the need to comment obsessively about Mimi fake name when he has nothing to add to the discussion?

All he is good for is assuming people are using fake names, with no evidence, then banning them. He represents how URC works - bunch of deluded fanboy idiots.[/quote]

You seem upset dude, do you need a hug?

Seriously though, you do seem to have a bit of an issue with me and since I have no idea who you are for sure I have no idea why. Happily I don't actually care either.

Let me just say this again. We don't ban people for disagreeing. Ever. I know SW said he was banned from the URC but unless he started a fake profile and trolled them I don't think that's true.

If you have a genuine profile that is genuinely you then you're welcome. It doesn't even have to have your full name if you don't want it to just as long as it's your day to day profile, your friends etc

Gary Kiernan wrote:

etc

^ Hey, it is Budding Idiot who registered Gary's name.

Fake Gary wrote:

Gary Kiernan wrote:

etc

^ Hey, it is Budding Idiot who registered Gary's name.

Nope, that's me. Send me a message on FB if you don't believe me. Or if that's not good enough I messaged one of the admins a couple of days ago to retrieve it from the troll who registered it. Ask them to make sure the IP addresses match up.

Gary Kiernan wrote:

Nope, that's me.

Thank you for confirming you are a fool. And we already know your name is fake. And that you insist on "real" names being used on URC.

Fake Gary wrote:

Gary Kiernan wrote:

Nope, that's me.

Thank you for confirming you are a fool. And we already know your name is fake. And that you insist on "real" names being used on URC.

You do need a hug don't you?

Gary Kiernan wrote:

.

Gary fake name Kienan/Dalton knows absolutely nothing about tech, and why does he feel the need to comment obsessively about Mimi fake name when he has nothing to add to the discussion?

All he is good for is assuming people are using fake names, with no evidence, then banning them. He represents how URC works - bunch of deluded fanboy idiots.[/quote]

You seem upset dude, do you need a hug?

Seriously though, you do seem to have a bit of an issue with me and since I have no idea who you are for sure I have no idea why. Happily I don't actually care either.

Let me just say this again. We don't ban people for disagreeing. Ever. I know SW said he was banned from the URC but unless he started a fake profile and trolled them I don't think that's true.

If you have a genuine profile that is genuinely you then you're welcome. It doesn't even have to have your full name if you don't want it to just as long as it's your day to day profile, your friends etc[/quote]

As you are clearly reading every post on here why are you ignoring the fact it's been stated several times that you banned people that were NOT fake just because they didn't agree with your clique over there.

Like Phil Turner and that Elke woman from Beligium who were not fake.

As you don't know how fb works, you report a fake profile and let fb deal with it, you don't assume people are fake just because YOU don't know them.

People can make friend lists private and set whole profile to private.

Laz uses a fake name and has no profile photo. Going to ban him? No, thought not.

Numerous profiles in your moronic group that have race names not a person, and silly names like "John Runs". You don't ban them. You only ban people who disagree with you that you don't know, and just declare they "must be fake".

You have absolutely nothing to contribute to this thread so WHY are you posting the same shit several times?

Gary Kiernan wrote:

Fake Gary wrote:

Thank you for confirming you are a fool. And we already know your name is fake. And that you insist on "real" names being used on URC.

You do need a hug don't you?

0/10 Faker

A hug from you? You cannot be serious.

I post here because there's points I want to address. And it annoys you my little anonymous follower.

Both good reasons I feel.

Oh and I've addresses both of your points previously. I do really feel the need to repeat myself again

Gary Kiernan wrote:

I post here because there's points I want to address. And it annoys you my little anonymous follower.

Both good reasons I feel.

Oh and I've addresses both of your points previously. I do really feel the need to repeat myself again

Oh, the real Gary claimed he was done with this site and never coming back.

Oh, the real Gary claimed he was done with this site and never coming back.[/quote]

I missed you my little wankpuffin.

Gary Kiernan wrote:

I post here because there's points I want to address. And it annoys you my little anonymous follower.

Both good reasons I feel.

Oh and I've addresses both of your points previously. I do really feel the need to repeat myself again

Ps, I'm not Fake Gary. Believe it or not, there is more than one person that knows what an utter knob you are and your group.

You repeat yourself and never address the points made to you

Now scuttle off back to your fb clique and go and ban some people to make yourself feel important

😘

Always easy to insult someone anonymously isn't it?

Hello, budding idiot. ... Stop pretending to be Gary K. Thanxs.

FYI: Did you know that "wankpuffin" is Nick Harvey's mum's internet handle.