We don't need a million thread on this topic. We like one thread per topic. We merged several others into this thread including one called "Alex Pretti was a deranged lunatic." and one called "New York Times reports that Pretti attacked ICE cars 11 days before his death" and one called "LeBron James: Why hasn't he commented on the Alex Pretti killing?"
4400 times. The constitution doesn’t matter to ICE but it does to Americans.
Hence the devastating turn of opinion. Trump’s second term is over. Lame duck has begun
Billy Crystal as a source? Lol. The pearl clutching by libs is awesome. Turns out that majority of these are lower court habeas rulings that have been overturned later by upper courts. Oops. Someone didn’t do their research. 😀
A better question is why are liberals clogging the courts with frivolous suits that are consistently overturned?
Libs lose again.
Nope. You lose. Things are starting to pile up against your side. You should hide in your basement with you tail tucked in, you little coward.
4400 times. The constitution doesn’t matter to ICE but it does to Americans.
Hence the devastating turn of opinion. Trump’s second term is over. Lame duck has begun
Billy Crystal as a source? Lol. The pearl clutching by libs is awesome. Turns out that majority of these are lower court habeas rulings that have been overturned later by upper courts. Oops. Someone didn’t do their research. 😀
A better question is why are liberals clogging the courts with frivolous suits that are consistently overturned?
Billy Crystal as a source? Lol. The pearl clutching by libs is awesome. Turns out that majority of these are lower court habeas rulings that have been overturned later by upper courts. Oops. Someone didn’t do their research. 😀
A better question is why are liberals clogging the courts with frivolous suits that are consistently overturned?
Libs lose again.
None of the 4400 have been overturned
Sorry. Billy crystal.
In a 2–1 ruling, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals determined the administration had correctly reinterpreted federal immigration law to bar many unauthorized immigrants arrested by ICE from requesting release on bond while their deportation cases proceed.
In a 2–1 ruling, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals determined the administration had correctly reinterpreted federal immigration law to bar many unauthorized immigrants arrested by ICE from requesting release on bond while their deportation cases proceed.
Libs lose again. Hahahahaha
Doesn’t apply to illegal detentions. Why don’t you care about the constitution?
This post was edited 13 seconds after it was posted.
This study was buried in the POLITICO story. GOP could lose 6 seats (including 2 of their own!) they thought they gerrymandered Dems out of if Latinos swing 15% left https://t.co/HniLYDFYucpic.twitter.com/Z6jtvnqDGm
That’s why your people opened the Immigration Floodgates to the third world back in ‘65, never mind people like your cousin Mayorkas (a true fake), the HIAS Handyman, cranking them open wider for illegals during the Biden “Presidency”. 🥸😎
In a 2–1 ruling, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals determined the administration had correctly reinterpreted federal immigration law to bar many unauthorized immigrants arrested by ICE from requesting release on bond while their deportation cases proceed.
Libs lose again. Hahahahaha
Doesn’t apply to illegal detentions. Why don’t you care about the constitution?
It’s the only thing that applies to these “illegal detentions.” lol
it was a classic self-own on your part.
I’m sorry you don’t agree with the the higher court’s ruling.
That earlier poster pointed out why we see artificial swings. You seem to ignore those who point these things out, who point out what you really are and why you do what you do. But you do complain a lot behind the scenes and have their posts removed, as you’ll do with this post and a host of earlier ones. Maybe you’ll wait until late evening. LOL
That earlier poster pointed out why we see artificial swings. You seem to ignore those who point these things out, who point out what you really are and why you do what you do. But you do complain a lot behind the scenes and have their posts removed, as you’ll do with this post and a host of earlier ones. Maybe you’ll wait until late evening. LOL
That earlier poster pointed out why we see artificial swings. You seem to ignore those who point these things out, who point out what you really are and why you do what you do. But you do complain a lot behind the scenes and have their posts removed, as you’ll do with this post and a host of earlier ones. Maybe you’ll wait until late evening. LOL
Harambe ignored the actual point again. You’re right. He must be what you guys posit. Figures. Odd, but it figures. They sure get around, don’t they?
That earlier poster pointed out why we see artificial swings. You seem to ignore those who point these things out, who point out what you really are and why you do what you do. But you do complain a lot behind the scenes and have their posts removed, as you’ll do with this post and a host of earlier ones. Maybe you’ll wait until late evening. LOL
Harambe ignored the actual point again. You’re right. He must be what you guys posit. Figures. Odd, but it figures. They sure get around, don’t they?
Why would I need to refute something that’s obviously incorrect?
That earlier poster pointed out why we see artificial swings. You seem to ignore those who point these things out, who point out what you really are and why you do what you do. But you do complain a lot behind the scenes and have their posts removed, as you’ll do with this post and a host of earlier ones. Maybe you’ll wait until late evening. LOL
Harambe ignored the actual point again. You’re right. He must be what you guys posit. Figures. Odd, but it figures. They sure get around, don’t they?
He did it again! You guys are right. We now know what he is! He’ll have your posts removed around 3 am his time.