I actually think Trump may be onto something. Using sanctions, military threats, etc. to try and stop horrible regimes from gaining power in the world has not proven to be effective. But if you run a grift where you pretend like you are going to do whatever these regimes want in exchange for massive bribes in the form of aircraft, crypto deals, etc., you will eventually run up such a huge grift bill for these regimes that they will collapse financially, causing a popular democratic uprising to overthrow corrupt monarchies. 12 dimensional chess . . . .
Again. Trump is unorthodox but you can’t deny the results.
you mean the stock market not having a new high for 91 days?
you mean killing poor people in africa by letting food rot?
you mean letting the president let his personal vendettas crush universities and law firms?
illegally sending people into foreign gulags? that kind of success?
that success? the kind of success that led to the lowest approval rating of any president every after the first 100 days?
This post was edited 33 seconds after it was posted.
The problem with it is that the intention isn't to educate it is to indoctrinate and keep racism alive so you can exploit it for politics.
It is isn't a coincidence that even the black Republicans are called racist by the democrats.
The state of black people in the US today is largely a product of Democrats destroying the black family and doing everything they can to teach young black kids that 100% of the problems in their lives are caused by white people.
Democrats have been a cancer on the black community.
It’s indoctrination to selectively teach about all that happened on our way here.
You’ve got ignorant racists who think that black people are just shiftless and largely incapable of advancing in society and who have no clue of centuries of work in subjugating them. From slavery to share cropping to Plessy v Ferguson to the Klan to lynching to massacres like Tulsa to Jim Crow, the government at varying levels was working to tip the scales towards the people in power.
Black veterans were denied GI Bill benefits.
Black home buyers were red listed and also forced into inferior facilities with far fewer opportunities for education.
Black citizens didn’t have the protection of but did feel the threat of law enforcement.
The effects of what was once legal racial subjugation are still felt today.
Black people on average receive criminal sentences 20% longer than others:
LBJ and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 destroyed black families by, what? Making sure that public businesses couldn’t refuse them service?
I’ve been down this road with you before, where you’re going to say that none of the facts that I’ve cited matter and that what the evil Democrats’ plan has been since 1933 to get black people hooked on government services and handouts and thus the Democratic Party. Except that’s not really the case, is it?
In September 1932, Robert Vann, the editor of the Pittsburgh Courier, a leading Black newspaper for the first half of the 20th Century, made an endorsement of FDR, saying, “turn Lincoln’s picture to the wall. The debt has been paid.” This was after three years of non-intervention from the Hoover administration and Hoover went so far as to refuse to be photographed with black people until a month after Vann’s endorsement of FDR.
But even after the implementation of the New Deal, many of the programs didn’t benefit black people. Farmers were paid to not produce, so farm owners in the south got government subsidies that they didn’t distribute to their black sharecroppers. Black businesses couldn’t afford to participate in the National Recovery Administration and black applicants were bypassed for white ones in the New Deal’s job programs. It wasn’t until after a lot of direct petitioning from letters, as well as prodding from Eleanor Roosevelt, that FDR and some of the Democratic Party started to listen to the actual pleas of the black community began to actually bring on black voices and perspectives into the government, including Vann, Eugene K. Jones, Robert Weaver and Mary McLeod Bethune. And despite much resistance in their departments and little direct contact with FDR, except for McLeod Bethune, they ended up making substantive differences for black people across the nation. The WPA got education and job opportunities out to more black people, agricultural relief came from resettlement programs and for the first time, anti-discrimination clauses went into federal contracts. That is why these black leaders then made the case to their communities that FDR must be re-elected if they’re going to continue their progress.
Now go ahead and tell me why all that is BS and FDR and the Democrats were really bad for the black community.
It's baffling that you keep making this absurd argument that only the enlightened Democrats are aware that systemic racism existed in the past...
LBJ destroyed the black family by adding a financial incentive to single motherhood.
As he famously said, "I'll have those n*ggers voting Democratic for 200 years."
It's 100% true that the African-Americans began shifting to the Democrat party in the 1930s to get in on the free goodies offered in racist FDR's New Deal.
Democrat entitlements have destroyed everything they pretend they're supposed to improved.
If I were serving in the military under this Biden guy who had the Autopen controlled by others as Commander in Chief, I would be filing suit against the DNC for putting my life on the line under false pretenses. The rest of us as Trump voters should be asking for reparations for putting up with the slander on our families coming from this guy who did not have the mental capacity to make such judgements.
BREAKING: CHAOTIC SCENE JUST BROKE OUT AT THE WH: Trump explodes at reporter Peter Alexander and threatens to investigate NBC after he presses him about reports he’s keeping the $400M jet from Qatar. This is insane.
LOL!!!!! Chaotic scene? What are you watching, CNN or MSNBC?
That'd be quite a revelation. I'd actually be surprised. But have no doubt that gnarly, eddy, adolt, and a host of others are the same person.
I just don't see how it can be that Dee Dee/Eddie/... is the same person as the largest city in the Swedish county of Skåne. Hasn't Dee Dee been banned on multiple occasions? I don't see how that is possible if he is the largest city in the Swedish county of Skåne.
That'd be quite a revelation. I'd actually be surprised. But have no doubt that gnarly, eddy, adolt, and a host of others are the same person.
I just don't see how it can be that Dee Dee/Eddie/... is the same person as the largest city in the Swedish county of Skåne. Hasn't Dee Dee been banned on multiple occasions? I don't see how that is possible if he is the largest city in the Swedish county of Skåne.
I am Winston Smith and LateNightEddy and that's it.
It is a peculiar mental defect amongst leftists that they simply cannot comprehend that more than 1 of the 77 MILLION people who disagree with has internet access.
Tax cuts promote growth which increases tax revenue...
This idiot still believing trickle down?
Tax cuts fund stock buybacks. Proven during Trump 1.0
You’re not so bad you old coot, have some good logic here n there, but do you really truly believe the stock market will not eventually rise in the next 3.5 years under Trump?
Tax cuts fund stock buybacks. Proven during Trump 1.0
You’re not so bad you old coot, have some good logic here n there, but do you really truly believe the stock market will not eventually rise in the next 3.5 years under Trump?
The soft bigotry of lowered expectations.
from ‘morning in America’ to ‘in 3.5 years the market will eventually make a new high’
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
Perhaps the major achievement of the resistance is the death blow to any confidence that Israeli colonists had in their military and its ability to protect them.
You’re not so bad you old coot, have some good logic here n there, but do you really truly believe the stock market will not eventually rise in the next 3.5 years under Trump?
The soft bigotry of lowered expectations.
from ‘morning in America’ to ‘in 3.5 years the market will eventually make a new high’
HAA!! soft bigotry, lol. you’re nuts as usual. Thats funny though. I was just curious if he, or any of you, really believe the market will stay down, or just taking pot shots while you can?
from ‘morning in America’ to ‘in 3.5 years the market will eventually make a new high’
HAA!! soft bigotry, lol. you’re nuts as usual. Thats funny though. I was just curious if he, or any of you, really believe the market will stay down, or just taking pot shots while you can?
There's a lot of buzz about the tariffs and tariff threats causing supply shock which could cause the market to dip further than it has. It is in Trump's best interest to have the stock market moving upwards by next summer ahead of the midterms. It is also in my best interest, so I'm hoping we're all on the same page with this one.
HAA!! soft bigotry, lol. you’re nuts as usual. Thats funny though. I was just curious if he, or any of you, really believe the market will stay down, or just taking pot shots while you can?
There's a lot of buzz about the tariffs and tariff threats causing supply shock which could cause the market to dip further than it has. It is in Trump's best interest to have the stock market moving upwards by next summer ahead of the midterms. It is also in my best interest, so I'm hoping we're all on the same page with this one.
Yeah I'm sure the market will hit a new high during trump's admin.
but trump has directly cost US investors trillions and trillions of dollars because of his terrible presidency, and the market has begun his term in a hole.
