Excellent point. Historians, political scientists, statesmen, and military strategists across the ages have ALL agreed: The BIG problem with human history isn't the unjustified and brutal invaders, it's the brutalized invaded who are too stubborn and don't give up.
You f***** nailed it.
Did you say something (like usual, painfully repetitively) about being "painfully stupid"?
adolt's GED thesis (hand-written on 2 pages of torn-out spiral paper): "Churchill was dumb and woke"
Sorry, that's wrong, he spelled Churchill with one "L."
“3905 Americans over 30 years have been killed in terrorist attacks or an average of 130 a year. 130 is a hot summer in Chicago,
Where Democrats kill for pleasure. We get it. Trying our best as you work against this nations safety and lob missiles into Russia on the way out the door.
“3905 Americans over 30 years have been killed in terrorist attacks or an average of 130 a year. 130 is a hot summer in Chicago, so terrorism isn’t a significant thing worth dealing with through federal laws and law enforcement funding”
Well that’s an incredibly stupid and callous thing to say, wouldn’t you agree?
I think it's incredibly stupid that you think lynching is even remotely comparable to terrorism in 2025...
Putin publicly humiliates the Trump admin and makes his goofs travel all over the globe multiple times. Then Pooty spits in Trumps face directly several times promising more talks. Finally after months of getting played like fools the Trump admin finally recognizes what the world has been telling them. That Putin doesn’t want the war to be over!
So what is Trumps new response to being humiliated?
He wants to walk away, lift all Russian sanctions and blame Biden for his failure.
Trump is worth $7 billion and spends his days working the Oval Office and respected all over the world.
Old Running guy:
Net worth: ______________________
Place of employment: _______________________
Do the leaders of the world respect you?
$0, unemployed. Guy's a loser just like the lot of them. I've realized too, the whacked out libs on here are minorities. Anti-whites. 'Cept Nancy. Bless her heart.
“It’s stupid to think that Russia should be stopped from annexing whatever territory it wants”
Who is going to stop them? You?
If you aren't willing to fight (you're not) it is immoral to demand a war continue just so you can virtue signal about it.
You're on fire today. Absolutely correct. Totally reminds me of those super-annoying "virtue signaling" war bond campaigns in WWII. Trying to save Europe, our future peace and prosperity, and maybe leave a few Jews on the planet? Right. We all know that NO ONE on the home front believed in any of that crap.
A more useful reminder would be to remind you to keep in mind how painfully stupid you are.
Zelensky does not want peace and refuses to entertain any realistic scenario for peace.
There's nothing any American can tell Putin or do to Putin that can overcome Zelensky being even dumber than you.
Excellent point. Historians, political scientists, statesmen, and military strategists across the ages have ALL agreed: The BIG problem with human history isn't the unjustified and brutal invaders, it's the brutalized invaded who are too stubborn and don't give up.
You f***** nailed it.
Did you say something (like usual, painfully repetitively) about being "painfully stupid"?
I call you painfully stupid because you demonstrate your very low IQ on a daily basis.
It's lovely that you pretend to care about Ukraine. Everyone agrees what's happening to Ukraine isn't "fair".
The problem you idiots have is don't understand reality.
Ukraine cannot win the war. Europe does not have a functional military and even if they did they are completely unwilling to use it to save Ukraine.
The only way this war ends with Ukraine keeping some semblance of sovereignty is if they make concessions to the side that's winning the war.
You do not get to dictate terms when you are losing.
I misremembered the ratio but the point about it being a very small number is valid.
Half the Democrats today think thousands of black people are murdered by cops every year just for being black.
Democrats were awful when they were lynching people and they are awful now.
Clearly far more Black people were lynched, as you should know, and Black people made up a lower percentage of the population.
You can own up to the fact that most of the racist Southern Democrats left the party between Truman integrating the armed forces and Johnson pushing for the Civil Rights Act.
If you aren't willing to fight (you're not) it is immoral to demand a war continue just so you can virtue signal about it.
You're on fire today. Absolutely correct. Totally reminds me of those super-annoying "virtue signaling" war bond campaigns in WWII. Trying to save Europe, our future peace and prosperity, and maybe leave a few Jews on the planet? Right. We all know that NO ONE on the home front believed in any of that crap.
I misremembered the ratio but the point about it being a very small number is valid.
Half the Democrats today think thousands of black people are murdered by cops every year just for being black.
Democrats were awful when they were lynching people and they are awful now.
Clearly far more Black people were lynched, as you should know, and Black people made up a lower percentage of the population.
You can own up to the fact that most of the racist Southern Democrats left the party between Truman integrating the armed forces and Johnson pushing for the Civil Rights Act.
It's a tiny number compared to the population size and much smaller than the typical leftist realizes.
And the party switch is a lie you lefties tell yourselves to distance yourselves from your own history.
George Wallace died a proud Democrat like almost all the other racist southern Democrats. The south didn't turn reliably red until 1980.
Trump underestimated how stupid and craven Zelensky is.
Zelensky has no interest in ending the war. You cannot deal with an insane person who does not understand what the situation is.
Zelenksy still thinks Ukraine can get Crimea back.
The man is an utter moron.
“It’s stupid to think that Russia should be stopped from annexing whatever territory it wants”
Russians are scumbags. Russia is an enemy of America. Both are facts.
It's bizarre and astounding how Trump was able to get his MAGAs to flip everything they ever believed in and become Russia supporters. Even three years ago under Biden, when they were looking for signals as to what to say, these type of people never would have been saying the illogical, dangerous, immoral, false and un-American nonsense they now shout with enthusiasm. Yet Trump was able to get them to turn on a dime with a few vague references to his eggmeister Putin and some old style blame-America-first hippie/liberal nonsense. There seems to be nothing Trump can't get these freaks to think they believe.
“3905 Americans over 30 years have been killed in terrorist attacks or an average of 130 a year. 130 is a hot summer in Chicago, so terrorism isn’t a significant thing worth dealing with through federal laws and law enforcement funding”
Well that’s an incredibly stupid and callous thing to say, wouldn’t you agree?
I think it's incredibly stupid that you think lynching is even remotely comparable to terrorism in 2025...
I misremembered the ratio but the point about it being a very small number is valid.
Half the Democrats today think thousands of black people are murdered by cops every year just for being black.
Democrats were awful when they were lynching people and they are awful now.
Clearly far more Black people were lynched, as you should know, and Black people made up a lower percentage of the population.
You can own up to the fact that most of the racist Southern Democrats left the party between Truman integrating the armed forces and Johnson pushing for the Civil Rights Act.
You are clearly a racist Mr. Wigand. Seek help as you clearly have issues against other races. What an embarrassment to have citizens like you in the USA.
really is remarkable to see nominal Americans willing to give up democracy if it just stops 'wokeism.' That's how much they hate it.
I hope that's a wake up call to Democrats not to push more gender and race stuff at people. If democracy survives trump, Dems will have to bend a little and throw the gays, etc under the bus.
Sad, but that's how this country will have to live alongside m'aga if we want to remain a nation.
First they came for the Communists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Communist Then they came for the Socialists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Socialist Then they came for the trade unionists And I did not speak out Because I was not a trade unionist Then they came for the Jews And I did not speak out Because I was not a Jew Then they came for me And there was no one left To speak out for me
“3905 Americans over 30 years have been killed in terrorist attacks or an average of 130 a year. 130 is a hot summer in Chicago, so terrorism isn’t a significant thing worth dealing with through federal laws and law enforcement funding”
Well that’s an incredibly stupid and callous thing to say, wouldn’t you agree?
I think it's incredibly stupid that you think lynching is even remotely comparable to terrorism in 2025...
Do you want to ask the people who were lynched if they thought it was a problem?
Set out some values for when something is a big deal or not.
3265 people being lynched over 58 years isn’t a big deal worthy of federal legislation, investigation and enforcement because why?
3905 people being killed in acts of terrorism over 30 years is a big deal and is worthy of federal legislation, investigation and enforcement because why?
3532 people were killed and over 47,000 others were injured during The Troubles over a period of 30 years. Was that a big deal or not so much?
Can you offer some insight in how the frequency and circumstances of how and when innocent people are killed by others rises to the level of meriting government intervention?
This is often when I’d expect to hear about annual deaths from cars or swimming pools. About 400 people in the US drown each year in swimming pools and it’s usually small children who tragically die when they’re unattended and pools aren’t properly locked and fenced in accordance with regulations.
For cars, it’s hard to argue that we don’t need them in our society, but there are about 40,000 to 45,000 automobile fatalities in the US each year. However, I argue that the number of automobile fatalities is down from its peak 50 years ago because of laws and regulations that have been put on the books since then. In 1973, over 56,000 people died in auto accidents in the US, or 26.9 per 100,000 people. Today, that per capita number is down to 13.4 per 100,000.
Returning to the question at hand, please explain your methodology into thinking what causes of death or serious injury are worthy of federal intervention and which are not.