Pointer outer of obvious wrote:
Wow the right does this too??? I’m shocked
I’m more shocked the media still covers for Paul Pelosi when it’s well known he frequents gay hangouts in SF and DC. Old Nancy still carries that beard like a trooper.
-
107
-
*trump2028 wrote:
This is why the “kosher” legacy media cannot be trusted. It’s run by the descendants of acheming liars who ran Pravda back in the days of the USSR.
61 -
There is zero evidence they were friends or knew each other. Walz re-appointed Boetler to the board he was already serving on before Walz was governor.
Re: the Shapiro fire bomber, the guy's own brother says he encouraged the entire family to vote for Trump.
As has been the case for decades, political violence is significantly more common on the right but many/most of those perpetrating it exist outside standard left/right spectrum.37 -
reading comprehension is a skill wrote:
Tyrone ReXXXing wrote:
Whaaaaaaaaatttt?!?!
You think that that snopes Link with the two and a half minute video of kirk mocking black women in general and specific successful black women as being stupid and having stolen white people's jobs and not having the "brain processing power to be taken seriously" somehow presents a context where kirk is not being hateful against black women and an A- hole ?!
You did the exact opposite and proved the poster, correct that you were attempting to "correct". Wow.
Here is a link to the longform discussion I referenced that was taken out of context. It's the same link embedded in the snopes article.I hope you would take time to listen to it but I doubt you will have the intellectual honesty to do so before responding to this comment. I'm not saying he wasn't a dick or sometimes rude/condescending in some of his responses. However, that is a far cry from meeting the definition of a racist.
I strongly supported my point with linking the snopes article and proved that there was nuance, that those on social media cherry picked a quote and maliciously took it out of context to appear racist(by definition) in nature. Your race and gender is irrelevant to the obvious truth that you, Trone ReXXXing, lack the brain processing power to be taken seriously or engage in this conversation
Snopes is literally part of that kosher legacy media, as they are actually funded by the same folks. Just another socialist front org that pretends to be truth while griding out lies and half-truths to favor the left. Tyrone Rex… is another of those pale, hairy Great Neck communist types playing acting.
101 -
nwrunr09 wrote:
There is zero evidence they were friends or knew each other. Walz re-appointed Boetler to the board he was already serving on before Walz was governor.Re: the Shapiro fire bomber, the guy's own brother says he encouraged the entire family to vote for Trump.
As has been the case for decades, political violence is significantly more common on the right but many/most of those perpetrating it exist outside standard left/right spectrum.
lol… “PBS”… etc. Gotta go to the old standys who worked hard to coordinate their defense of Walz just like they’ve been working to convince people that a gay kid who has a trans lover is a right wing MAGA “neo-nazi”. Yeah… these are the same people who tell us men can be women. Do not believe anything they say at this point.
92 -
absolutelystupid wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
They dont do logic.
Because of hiring bias.
Its not new stuff. White guys prefer blondes.
And DEI hiring has always been around. Ex military always got improved hiring scores in interview processes.
Especially in government jobs
Well, people tended to see ex-military folks as likely being disciplined and able to follow through on instructions, so they nabbed a few extra points. That’s a far cry from being handed a job just for having black or brown skin or a vagina, even when one is lacking in true skills pertinent to the particular work at hand.
62 -
nwrunr09 wrote:
There is zero evidence they were friends or knew each other. Walz re-appointed Boetler to the board he was already serving on before Walz was governor.Re: the Shapiro fire bomber, the guy's own brother says he encouraged the entire family to vote for Trump.
As has been the case for decades, political violence is significantly more common on the right but many/most of those perpetrating it exist outside standard left/right spectrum.
Not true at all. The more liberal you are the more likely you are going to be accepting of political violence. According to polls people who are very liberal are eight times more likely than those who are very conservative to be accepting of political violence against those they oppose:103 -
Bradfghodr wrote:
Nashville, Minneapolis, the cult that killed the elderly farmer in his home now Charlie
Transtifa violence has surpassed Islamic terrorism and the same attention to eradicate it should be employed by every law enforcement department and law abiding community.
Normal, law-abiding people are eventually going to be forced to take matters into their own hands. When that happens the cowardly leftists will scream, moan, gnash their teeth and play victim while having to pay the piper. The instigators and financial base will pack up and run to some other country where they’ll once again work hard on destroying cultural institutions and norms.
73 -
Precious Roy wrote:
This is pretty good.
Just another hypocrtically racist black preacher riling up the crowd to get more shekels tossed into the collection plates. You just know he’s more interested in gettin’ azz from his congregants than any “word of God” he professes to follow.
72 -
Being "accepting of political violence" or believing "political violence can be justified" is not the same as "actually committed political violence." If you want to read an actual peer-reviewed, academic paper about political violence and not a bunch of random tweets, one is linked below. The abstract is as follows:
Across both datasets, we find that radical acts perpetrated by individuals associated with left-wing causes are less likely to be violent. In the United States, we find no difference between the level of violence perpetrated by right-wing and Islamist extremists. However, differences in violence emerge on the global level, with Islamist extremists being more likely than right-wing extremists to engage in more violent acts.Of course, universities are all woke, can't be trusted and we should just trust tweets by "Red State Eagle Patriot MAGA" unquestioningly
36 -
Precious Roy wrote:
*trump2028 wrote:
If DEI hires are as qualified and capable as normal hires, why are there special programs to hire DEI people?
Because in order to get people of color and women into jobs that have for a very long time been dominated by white males, you need to do something to open the doors. Especially when you get into things like c-suite positions and big corporations, big law, finance and accounting, you get a hiring climate that is dominated by white males who look out for their country club buddies.
And then, once people of color and women break through, you can not have a "one and done" token hire. That is because when women or people of color join an engineering firm, law firm, etc. where everyone is white and male, they feel alone and isolated. Having additional employees who are from a protected class allows for mentorship and a feeling that people of color and women belong.
Talk about copypasta.
Why are most DEI hires so unproductive in comparison to everyone else? Can’t blame whitey because one can’t help those East Asians tend to deliver top notch work. So what’s really going on?
54 -
Robinson has to appear in court tomorrow. That means the Feds will be making their first public filings laying out the case against Robinson.
There will obviously be a press conference with Kash, Bongino and Bondi. They are going to do everything they can to make this sound like it was a broader conspiracy so Trump can sick the FBI on any organization that is in any way remotely connected to Robinson. While that is a very serious issue and probably not something we have seen since the McCarthy era, one of those three is going to have to get up in front of the world press and convince the nation that there is a very dangerous underground online network of . . . wait for it . . . furries.
Q: Director Patel, Laurent Saint Paul, Agence France. Qu'est que c'est un . . . err what izz a "furry".
A: Well, from what we have gathered these are people who like to wear onesies or different costumes to basically dress up like stuffed animals.
Q: Director Patel, Simon Hawthorn, BBC News. Have these networks of furries ever been on the FBI's radar as a potential domestic terror organization?
A: No. They are just a bunch of people who like to dress up like stuffed animals.
49 -
Oldrunningguy wrote:
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Forgive us if we laugh in your face.
The most unprofessional people in American history were in the Biden and Obama administrations.
OJ walks free thanks to reasonable doubt. And many cases are thrown out due to legal missteps.
The head of the FBI who never tried a case nor has any law enforcement experience should not be on Fox News spilling selective evidence that he believes will please the dear leader. And broadcasting the conclusion that he is 100% guilty which sets up a perfect defense motion that he could never receive a fair trial with Patels action.
Oy vey, OJ walked free because the DA made sure he worked with the defense to stack the jury with black people whom he knew would never, ever find OJ guilty. Look up Gil Garcetti, the DA, his history. You’ll see where his son Eric (former LA mayor) learned to be so dishoneat.
51 -
Precious Roy wrote:
Robinson has to appear in court tomorrow. That means the Feds will be making their first public filings laying out the case against Robinson.
There will obviously be a press conference with Kash, Bongino and Bondi. They are going to do everything they can to make this sound like it was a broader conspiracy so Trump can sick the FBI on any organization that is in any way remotely connected to Robinson. While that is a very serious issue and probably not something we have seen since the McCarthy era, one of those three is going to have to get up in front of the world press and convince the nation that there is a very dangerous underground online network of . . . wait for it . . . furries.
Q: Director Patel, Laurent Saint Paul, Agence France. Qu'est que c'est un . . . err what izz a "furry".
A: Well, from what we have gathered these are people who like to wear onesies or different costumes to basically dress up like stuffed animals.
Q: Director Patel, Simon Hawthorn, BBC News. Have these networks of furries ever been on the FBI's radar as a potential domestic terror organization?
A: No. They are just a bunch of people who like to dress up like stuffed animals.
You seem very worried thst an actual broader conspiracy actually will be revealed. You come off as trying to provide preemptive defense. Is there something you’re trying to hide… about yourself? 😛
61 -
Tim Walz Brand of Socialism wrote:
Oldrunningguy wrote:
OJ walks free thanks to reasonable doubt. And many cases are thrown out due to legal missteps.
The head of the FBI who never tried a case nor has any law enforcement experience should not be on Fox News spilling selective evidence that he believes will please the dear leader. And broadcasting the conclusion that he is 100% guilty which sets up a perfect defense motion that he could never receive a fair trial with Patels action.
Oy vey, OJ walked free because the DA made sure he worked with the defense to stack the jury with black people whom he knew would never, ever find OJ guilty. Look up Gil Garcetti, the DA, his history. You’ll see where his son Eric (former LA mayor) learned to be so dishoneat.
The problems with jury nullification have actually become worse in the major cities, with unfortunately more than a few hispanics also demonstrating the same behavior by refusing to convict hispanic criminals no matter what they’ve done. Things are getting more than dicey. It isn’t racist to point out facts.
20 -
Tim Walz Brand of Socialism wrote:
Precious Roy wrote:
Because in order to get people of color and women into jobs that have for a very long time been dominated by white males, you need to do something to open the doors. Especially when you get into things like c-suite positions and big corporations, big law, finance and accounting, you get a hiring climate that is dominated by white males who look out for their country club buddies.
And then, once people of color and women break through, you can not have a "one and done" token hire. That is because when women or people of color join an engineering firm, law firm, etc. where everyone is white and male, they feel alone and isolated. Having additional employees who are from a protected class allows for mentorship and a feeling that people of color and women belong.
Talk about copypasta.
Why are most DEI hires so unproductive in comparison to everyone else? Can’t blame whitey because one can’t help those East Asians tend to deliver top notch work. So what’s really going on?
Evidence ?
03 -
🚨 JD VANCE just WENT OFF on people who are calling for "UNITY" with radical leftists
"There is NO UNITY with people who scream at children over their parents' politics.
There is NO UNITY with someone who LIES about what Charlie Kirk said in order to excuse his murder.
There is NO UNITY with someone who HARASSES an innocent family the day after the father of that family lost a dear friend.
There is NO UNITY with the people who celebrate Charlie Kirk's assassination."43 -
It's probably just a coincidence that these left alternative groups are deleting their activity and posters are backtracking on their comments on certain platforms like bluesky. If discord got subpoenaed they probably wouldn't find much either since things would be deleted. We all know that nothing can be recovered once it's deleted...
71 -
Tim Walz Brand of Socialism wrote:
Pointer outer of obvious wrote:
Wow the right does this too??? I’m shocked
I’m more shocked the media still covers for Paul Pelosi when it’s well known he frequents gay hangouts in SF and DC. Old Nancy still carries that beard like a trooper.
He doesn’t hold public office and his private life isn’t fair game. What’s it to you, anyway.
43 -
TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:
Pointer outer of obvious wrote:
Wow the right does this too??? I’m shocked
You people are so dishonest.
1. Pelosi is alive.
2. Not 1 republican said the man deserved it or justified the attack.
Comparing these 2 situations is just highlighting the complete detachment of reality liberals live under.
So it’s ok that Trump mocked the victim of a violent crime that was politically motivated?
The right condones political violence ^ proof
25
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.