Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Flagpole wrote:

Suckers bet wrote:

Either way, we would have gotten the most corrupt POTUS in history. Turns out the less corrupt of the two won.

You are bonkers.

But he’s correct.

Good mourning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine AM?

Fiagpole wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

You are bonkers.

You are mental, desperate for attention, and grasping for the approval of others.

^CORRECT!!!

You have finally seen the light regarding yourself. Bravo.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Well, well, well- now we know why Lurch (John Kerry) went to Iran and try to keep the deal intact. Isn't that collusion. dems?

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2018/05/13/angry-iran-threatens-to-expose-western-officials-who-took-bribes-to-make-nuke-deal-happen-633970

Looks like Trump is going to move down to the second most corrupt POTUS in history.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

In addition to secret meetings with the enemy, I wonder if Lurch took a bribe. Iran may release the names.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/wheres-the-outrage-over-kerrys-secret-meetings-on-the-iran-deal/2018/05/11/0022ff18-546e-11e8-a551-5b648abe29ef_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.99804714b03b

I guess you already forgot Trump’s famous public words: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." You can provide no good reason for Trump’s decision to end the deal so you point to this drivel... you’ve got nothing, but you can keep investigating HRC over Benghazi, maybe you’ll find something someday.

A very stabIe genius! wrote:

Good mourning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine AM?

For me, mourning is almost never good.

Trollminator wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

In addition to secret meetings with the enemy, I wonder if Lurch took a bribe. Iran may release the names.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/wheres-the-outrage-over-kerrys-secret-meetings-on-the-iran-deal/2018/05/11/0022ff18-546e-11e8-a551-5b648abe29ef_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.99804714b03b

I guess you already forgot Trump’s famous public words: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." You can provide no good reason for Trump’s decision to end the deal so you point to this drivel... you’ve got nothing, but you can keep investigating HRC over Benghazi, maybe you’ll find something someday.

Why do anti Trumpters keep being up Hillary?

She lost. You lost. Get over it.

Trollminator wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

In addition to secret meetings with the enemy, I wonder if Lurch took a bribe. Iran may release the names.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/wheres-the-outrage-over-kerrys-secret-meetings-on-the-iran-deal/2018/05/11/0022ff18-546e-11e8-a551-5b648abe29ef_story.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.99804714b03b

I guess you already forgot Trump’s famous public words: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." You can provide no good reason for Trump’s decision to end the deal so you point to this drivel... you’ve got nothing, but you can keep investigating HRC over Benghazi, maybe you’ll find something someday.

What does it matter?

Rut roh shaggy wrote:

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Well, well, well- now we know why Lurch (John Kerry) went to Iran and try to keep the deal intact. Isn't that collusion. dems?

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2018/05/13/angry-iran-threatens-to-expose-western-officials-who-took-bribes-to-make-nuke-deal-happen-633970

Looks like Trump is going to move down to the second most corrupt POTUS in history.

Thanks for the objective and totally unbiased link brah....

What a great time to be alive, folks. The "Russian collusion" narrative continues to unravel and blow up in the faces of those on the Left. Trump will once again be proven correct in his skepticism of establishment/MSM collusion. His campaign was being spied on, was wiretapped, was character-assassinated daily, etc., in an effort to undermine democracy and hand the win to his opponent. The Russian hoax was simply an "insurance policy" (Strzok, 2016), if you will.

We are witnessing the Flagpole of all Flagpoles my friends. The meltdown is going to be incredible.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/05/13/strassel_fbi_was_using_human_intellignce_to_spy_on_2016_trump_campaign.html

Pure desperation to distract from the fallout of one of Trump's dumbest decisions. Trump has even asked his team to rummage through the lives of the people in Kerry's delegation to see if they can dig up anything negative. As expected, point and blame someone else.

Which is why the FBI sabotaged Hillary's campaign three days before the election.

You guys are retarded. Just own up to having elected a moron and now do your duty to your country to get him out of office before he causes more harm.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Well, well, well- now we know why Lurch (John Kerry) went to Iran and try to keep the deal intact. Isn't that collusion. dems?

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2018/05/13/angry-iran-threatens-to-expose-western-officials-who-took-bribes-to-make-nuke-deal-happen-633970

bizpacreview.com

That explains quite a bit about Mr. Tinfoil Rigged for Hillary.

"We know first-hand that censorship against conservative news is real. Please share stories and encourage your friends to sign up for our daily email blast so they are not getting shut out of seeing conservative news."

Trollminator wrote:

I guess you already forgot Trump’s famous public words: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing." You can provide no good reason for Trump’s decision to end the deal so you point to this drivel... you’ve got nothing, but you can keep investigating HRC over Benghazi, maybe you’ll find something someday.

I'm not sure you understand the context here. Trump's statement was mocking one of the earliest accusations of Russian meddling. The DNC claimed that someone had hacked their server. They were pointing the finger at Russia. It had also recently been exposed that 30,000 of Hillary's emails had been "deleted." 30,000 emails which were part of a subpoena, of course. They mysteriously vanished. A bunch of phones were also mysteriously smashed to pieces. And the server itself that was "hacked by Russians" was not (and his still not been) handed over to authorities.

What the DNC/HRC campaign did was clear Obstruction of Justice.

Rigged for Hillary wrote:

Well, well, well- now we know why Lurch (John Kerry) went to Iran and try to keep the deal intact. Isn't that collusion. dems?

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2018/05/13/angry-iran-threatens-to-expose-western-officials-who-took-bribes-to-make-nuke-deal-happen-633970

If true, it is without question bribery (which would be the legal charge here). So, that should not be allowed, and any Democrats involved in that should be punished to the fullest extent of the law.

What's sad here is that you question Democrats as if we would (some would) just ignore everything bad that any Democrat does, and by doing so, you are admitting that you do that on the other side of the aisle. Shouldn't matter to you what party someone is in, brother. Corruption is corruption.

Also, it never matters what some Democrat does or has done...that will never absolve Trump of his crimes. A Democrat, or ALL the Democrats could end up being more corrupt than Trump, and that still doesn't absolve Trump of his crimes. It is not an acceptable defense to say, "well, everyone does it" or even "so and so did it". For the record though, no one will be found to have been as corrupt as Trump will be proven to be...this is not a Republican vs. Democrat thing. It is only a Trump vs. people thing...he is the most corrupt.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Genuine Fake news wrote:

Which is why the FBI sabotaged Hillary's campaign three days before the election.

You guys are retarded. Just own up to having elected a moron and now do your duty to your country to get him out of office before he causes more harm.

Speaking of retarded, you really think there were a bunch of undecided voters the week leading up to the election?

And how did the FBI "sabotage Hillary's campaign three days before the election" anyway? That's about the day Comey predictably told the world, "everything's ok, we didn't find anything else here- she's good to go!" At this point, most outlets had Hillary as a 90% lock to win.

It's hilarious that folks on the Left truly believe after a month of the pu$$ygrabbing tape and a slow rollout of accusations that Trump assaulted women hysteria, that Comey's "wait a minute... nope- all good!" actions decided the election. Morans.

Flagpole wrote:

Impressed wrote:

You may be right about that. But it doesn’t change the fact that she has a vitae that is on par with Flagpole’s.

Your 17 year old daughter has an MA and 30 years of work experience and owns her own company that makes enough to put two kids through college, have zero debt and be on par to retire by age 55?

Good for her. That is magical.

Not quite to your level, but she does have:

1) Full academic ride to one of the top research universities in the US. So, there's one person she's already put through college. :) It's a private university to boot. Does she get bonus points for putting someone through a private school?

2) No MA though. You got her there. An MA these days is worth about as much as the paper it is printed on. Complete waste of time and money. She's intelligent and frugal and would never go that route.

3) At 16 through a science competition, she developed a product that she has been able to license to a major medical manufacturer in the last year. Her agreement with that company has been quite lucrative. She donates 20% of the proceeds and the rest she invests. She was fortunate to invest a portion of that money early in various crypto-currencies and made a tidy profit from those. Personally, I think she was more lucky that smart with those investments and am glad she is out of them.

4) For years, she has had a kid oriented, science-based Youtube channel that netted her about $30K in 2017. Since she will be matriculating in the Fall, she has been transitioning this to her younger sister to take over. Her sister could use this money to pay for college (although she'll likely receive a full academic ride as well). So, yeah, that makes a second person she put through college (just like you were able to do).

4) She also started and heads a Foundation that in 2017 raised $250,000 for pediatric cancer research. Two members on her board are the mayor of our city and the CEO of one of the hospitals in our city.

5) She has been given authorship attribution for two articles in peer reviewed journals.

6) She has zero debt - just like you.

I guess you do have that MA that she doesn't have and 30 years of work experience at McDonald's, Burger King, and a newspaper though. You win.

LOL@Lefties wrote:

What a great time to be alive, folks. The "Russian collusion" narrative continues to unravel and blow up in the faces of those on the Left. Trump will once again be proven correct in his skepticism of establishment/MSM collusion. His campaign was being spied on, was wiretapped, was character-assassinated daily, etc., in an effort to undermine democracy and hand the win to his opponent. The Russian hoax was simply an "insurance policy" (Strzok, 2016), if you will.

We are witnessing the Flagpole of all Flagpoles my friends. The meltdown is going to be incredible.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/05/13/strassel_fbi_was_using_human_intellignce_to_spy_on_2016_trump_campaign.html

A lot of speculation and no facts in that article. The FBI had a ton of reasons from multiple sources to suspect that the Trump campaign wasn't on the up and up. The problem with anything from Fox News (other than S. Smith, C. Wallace, and a little bit of Neil Cavuto), is that it has proven time and time again to be a right-wing propaganda machine for the White House, so we have to take everything like this with a grain of salt. On the left, there IS no equivalent...even MSNBC doesn't come close to the partisan level that Fox News does. I mean, seriously, Trump and Hannity converse "frequently". Righties would never have put up with that if Obama was talking to Rachel Maddow on a daily basis.

So, I'm open to anything, because I don't believe either party is free from people who will try to skirt the law, but we need way more than was in that article.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Was this a setup (from LOL@Lefties)?

You got Clownpole to say that something was speculation with no facts..... which he then subsequently does himself ("ton of reason"- yet still ZERO indictments from that time period)..... and then he wraps it up with his own speculation of Mueller coming for something.

Well done, sir. Gotta give it a 9/10.