The Fokus wrote:
Flagpole's brother wrote:
Sounding more and more like Flagpole himself. Is that really you, Flaggy?
Amazing that some take the same posts and put me on either pole.
I think you should be called unFokuspole from now on. You're all over the place.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Trump wins. Trump wins again.
Here is something for you to read about Trump's tax "Win." (Individuals are paying a lot more in state taxes).
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/12/business/economy/state-tax.htmlThe Fokus wrote:
Desperate 4 Trump wrote:
You have no defense for your political stance. Please offer something of value other than always commenting that Trump and Republicans will keep winning and Democrats really have no chance.
My actual stance is that Trump will very likely be re-elected. I think there are enough idiots in this country who will vote for him as part of his base along with enough moderate Republicans to re-elect him.
The Democrats may take the House but not the Senate. Is there any opinion out there that the Democrats will take the Senate? I don't think my stance on that is out on a limb by any means.
This seems to upset you. Why don't you express your feelings to the board so we can see if we can relax you a bit.
You seem rather upset that someone does not agree with position that Trump will be re-elected.
PS. I know who you are know.
So much for Trump's promises about drug prices.
[Trump} dropped the popular and populist proposals of his presidential campaign, opting not to have the federal government directly negotiate lower drug prices for Medicare. And he chose not to allow American consumers to import low-cost medicines from abroad.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/11/us/politics/trump-prescription-drugs-plan.html
The Fokus wrote:
Flagpole's brother wrote:
Sounding more and more like Flagpole himself. Is that really you, Flaggy?
Amazing that some take the same posts and put me on either pole.
Not really. This is LetsRun, home of the moron.
“It’s about money, but it’s about Russian criminal money, specifically,” Hettena clarified. “What happened, is in the 80s there was a group of Russian criminals here in New York that were running a really lucrative gas tax scam, they had so much money they didn’t know what to do with it.”
“The interesting thing is Donald Trump found them, and got them to invest in Trump Tower and they wound up buying a block of units for a little less than $6 million,” he continued.
“That was Trump’s introduction into this world of Russian criminal money,” Hettena argued. “It continued in Trump Tower, it continued in his casinos, it continued into development projects, right up until the present day.”
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/author-reveals-donald-trump-chased-russian-criminal-money-build-trump-tower/
Trump picks bigot pastor who claims Jews are going to Hell to lead prayer at new Jerusalem embassy
Impressed wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I have been many things. I was a paper boy as a kid. I sold worms because we lived close to a good fishing spot. I worked at McDonalds. I worked one day at a Burger King and decided I didn't like that. I have a degree in English and journalism and and a MA in English Education, and I began my career as a sports reporter and then moved to government reporting and then on to reporting on the generic drug industry working very closely with the FDA. I then went back to school and became a teacher. Did that for a while and then moved on to teaching adults how to use software programs. During some of this time and then later on too up to and including today, I was a gigging musician and a session musician. Now I run my own software consulting business and have for a long time now.
Quite impressive.
You’ve managed to do slightly better than my 17 year old daughter.
If she got her brains from you, she must be pretty damn stupid!;)
Upseter Trump wrote:
You seem rather upset that someone does not agree with position that Trump will be re-elected.
PS. I know who you are know.
Upset? No. Disagree yes.
Ok Sherlock. Who am I?
The Fokus wrote:
Upseter Trump wrote:
You seem rather upset that someone does not agree with position that Trump will be re-elected.
PS. I know who you are know.
Upset? No. Disagree yes.
Ok Sherlock. Who am I?
I'm not the poster that you responded to (have the mods check, I welcome it)>>>But I just read what you said and I'd be careful of what you wish for.
I can easily find your name, state, street and address.
This challenge went to me on another site and I posted everything, as they requested. The poster could do nothing about it and the site owner agreed as he asked/challenged anyone to post it.
People in I.T., that are good (that's me), can do it quicker than you think. One thing leads to another and so on and so on and so on, yes it's that easy.
ITIT+ITIT wrote:
I'm not the poster that you responded to (have the mods check, I welcome it)>>>But I just read what you said and I'd be careful of what you wish for.
I can easily find your name, state, street and address.
This challenge went to me on another site and I posted everything, as they requested. The poster could do nothing about it and the site owner agreed as he asked/challenged anyone to post it.
People in I.T., that are good (that's me), can do it quicker than you think. One thing leads to another and so on and so on and so on, yes it's that easy.
Bragging rights on the board notwithstanding, the question is who am I on the board. We'll let Rojo and Wejo sort out the legalities later.
Let the other poster worry about it. It was his question.
WTF. Trump picked a Fox News Baptist preacher to lead the prayer for the opening of the embassy in Israel? This guy hates Jews, Muslims and most Christians. Only in Trumpland can such a dumb decision be made.
IQ-45 Trump wrote:
Trump picks bigot pastor who claims Jews are going to Hell to lead prayer at new Jerusalem embassy
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/trump-picks-bigot-pastor-claims-jews-going-hell-lead-prayer-new-jerusalem-embassy/
The Fokus wrote:
Bragging rights on the board notwithstanding, the question is who am I on the board. We'll let Rojo and Wejo sort out the legalities later.
WOW. You must be very powerful to have Wejo and Rojo legally go after a poster. Very impressive.
ITIT+ITIT wrote:
The Fokus wrote:
Upset? No. Disagree yes.
Ok Sherlock. Who am I?
I'm not the poster that you responded to (have the mods check, I welcome it)>>>But I just read what you said and I'd be careful of what you wish for.
I can easily find your name, state, street and address.
This challenge went to me on another site and I posted everything, as they requested. The poster could do nothing about it and the site owner agreed as he asked/challenged anyone to post it.
People in I.T., that are good (that's me), can do it quicker than you think. One thing leads to another and so on and so on and so on, yes it's that easy.
Calling BS.
BS Detectorer wrote:
ITIT+ITIT wrote:
I'm not the poster that you responded to (have the mods check, I welcome it)>>>But I just read what you said and I'd be careful of what you wish for.
I can easily find your name, state, street and address.
This challenge went to me on another site and I posted everything, as they requested. The poster could do nothing about it and the site owner agreed as he asked/challenged anyone to post it.
People in I.T., that are good (that's me), can do it quicker than you think. One thing leads to another and so on and so on and so on, yes it's that easy.
Calling BS.
That would be obvious. Just someone trying to raise the hackles of a poster, and it seems to have done the job.
Nope wrote:
We have a SPENDING problem and both parties are to blame. < Trump is to blaim
[/quote]
I think an English teacher somewhere is to blame.
Flagpole wrote:
Nope wrote:
We have a SPENDING problem and both parties are to blame. < Trump is to blaim
I think an English teacher somewhere is to blame.[/quote]
That would another unpresidented Trumpism.
Did President Trump, and Congress, really plan to give a windfall to states as part of the tax cuts? It seems that the dreaded liberal states are getting more money because of the change than Republicans thought they would.
State Taxes wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Trump wins. Trump wins again.
Here is something for you to read about Trump's tax "Win." (Individuals are paying a lot more in state taxes).
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/12/business/economy/state-tax.html
RU Powerful wrote:
The Fokus wrote:
Bragging rights on the board notwithstanding, the question is who am I on the board. We'll let Rojo and Wejo sort out the legalities later.
WOW. You must be very powerful to have Wejo and Rojo legally go after a poster. Very impressive.
The only impressive thing within this debate is the amount of BS you're putting into it.
Cost of Tax Gifts wrote:
Did President Trump, and Congress, really plan to give a windfall to states as part of the tax cuts? It seems that the dreaded liberal states are getting more money because of the change than Republicans thought they would.
State Taxes wrote:
Here is something for you to read about Trump's tax "Win." (Individuals are paying a lot more in state taxes).
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/12/business/economy/state-tax.html
Yes, they seem to have forgotten to take that into account. States that do not have an income tax (like Texas) have gotten left out. That was not the plan.