Russians will never get rid of Putin. They love him. But even if they did get rid of him, it wouldn't matter. The Russian serf mentality would just usher in another dictator. Russians can't decide what gruel to slop in their bowls without some scumbag dictator telling them. They're like some human anomaly, these Russians. Incapable of normal human thought and emotions.
We bailed these Russian losers out from the Nazis, and they did nothing to repay us or even thank us. They just threatened our lives us with nuclear bombs and tried every way they could think of to destroy American society. And then in the early 90s, we handed these scumbags freedom on a platter. We spent trillions of $ (green cash) and thousands of American lives destroying Russian tyranny over its people, and these servile fools just jumped at the next chance to be serfs and losers again. And, until recent appeasement measures, they still threaten us with nuclear bombs.
These are awful people, and you are very un-American for supporting America's enemy. Highly un-American. Things are going to come home to roost for you and your like-minded ilks. May not be soon, but you will pay for your sedition, whether it's here on earth on in the Christian afterlife (or both), we don't know as of yet.
Developing . . . . .
Russia is not our enemy.
I'm going to assume, for the moment, that you are not a traitor and are just a very confused and naive person, perhaps bewildered by all the propaganda that Russian agents ring your bells with. Russia is your enemy. They've never once thanked America for bailing them out against the Germans circa 1940s. They threatened to put a nuclear weapon on your municipal head as recently as last year. They want you dead. They launch cyber attacks against your country, they infiltrate your media, they hack your IT systems, they threaten American airspace, they call you names in the streets, they conduct a shadow war on your military, and they burn American flags for fun. Russia is your enemy, pizza face.
Turns out the liberals pride n joy, Barack Obama himself, was front and center at Diddy’s freak offs. Ain’t that somethin’?
And MAGAs must now take pride and joy, and buy super expensive tickets, to see Trump's new shows at the Trump (nee Kennedy) Center. The makeover in gold should be done by now. . . . . New Trump approved shows include.
Chicago Moulin Rouge! The Musical Mrs. Doubtfire Monty Python’s Spamalot
Jesus fvcking Christ, that is some seriously stupid sh!t. Even retards here kind of know what Habeas Corpus is generally. It's in the Constitution, for Christ's sakes. It's in her prep notes.
Noem is a DEI hire. That's the only explanation I can come up with for this failure.
Turns out the liberals pride n joy, Barack Obama himself, was front and center at Diddy’s freak offs. Ain’t that somethin’?
Sorry, false alarm, was X pills shaped like him.
👆this is how you correct your mistakes libs.
Why are you talking to yourself?
Is am you egg?
Ring ding dong bong?
What mistake? Who made a mistake? You? Where? How do you know it was a mistake? What correction did you make? Can you like elaborate on any of this sh!t? We're supposed to just sit here and decipher your goofball musings for you? Jesus Christ, this is a high level message board, not some fvcking patchouli potluck. No one has time for this sh!t.
I'm going to assume, for the moment, that you are not a traitor and are just a very confused and naive person, perhaps bewildered by all the propaganda that Russian agents ring your bells with. Russia is your enemy. They've never once thanked America for bailing them out against the Germans circa 1940s. They threatened to put a nuclear weapon on your municipal head as recently as last year. They want you dead. They launch cyber attacks against your country, they infiltrate your media, they hack your IT systems, they threaten American airspace, they call you names in the streets, they conduct a shadow war on your military, and they burn American flags for fun. Russia is your enemy, pizza face.
You certainly lack a nuanced understanding.
During WW II the United States and the Soviet Union were formal allies whose cooperation was “essential to securing the defeat of Nazi Germany.” Roosevelt admitted he’d “hold hands with the devil” if necessary to beat Hitler. In the Cold War’s aftermath, Washington and Moscow still managed landmark agreements: successive presidents negotiated nuclear arms-control treaties (SALT, START, New START, etc.), and the New START treaty signed in 2010 was extended by both sides in 2021. These legally binding accords and dialogues show that, even amid rivalry, pragmatic U.S.–Russia engagement continues. Ignoring such history – and the fact that national interests often dictate cooperation over enmity – makes the claim that Russia is America’s unambiguous enemy intellectually dishonest and historically inaccurate.
Today’s strategic debate likewise rejects black‐and‐white thinking. Leading security figures urge that the U.S. must deal with “Russia as it is, not as we wish it to be,” blending firm deterrence with open channels of diplomacy. This pragmatic posture accords with international law and treaty commitments: NATO’s founding treaty (Article 5) obliges members to defend any ally that is attacked, reflecting a purely defensive pact rather than a vow of permanent aggression. Civilian and scientific ties also endure – Russia has committed to stay on the International Space Station through 2028 – which hardly fits the narrative of an implacable enemy. And in America’s own system, vigorous public debate is a democratic right, not a crime; civil liberties advocates remind us that “dissent is a form of patriotism.” Branding careful analysts as “naïve” or “traitorous” for questioning policy ignores these legal, historical, and strategic nuances. In a democracy, scrutiny of foreign-policy labels is not treason – it’s a cornerstone of informed citizenship.
Elon Musk fires everyone investigating him, misses his DOGE goal by 2 trillion dollars, steals all the data, and gets billions from America and foreign contracts. Then says “I am done giving money to politics for now.”
I'm going to assume, for the moment, that you are not a traitor and are just a very confused and naive person, perhaps bewildered by all the propaganda that Russian agents ring your bells with. Russia is your enemy. They've never once thanked America for bailing them out against the Germans circa 1940s. They threatened to put a nuclear weapon on your municipal head as recently as last year. They want you dead. They launch cyber attacks against your country, they infiltrate your media, they hack your IT systems, they threaten American airspace, they call you names in the streets, they conduct a shadow war on your military, and they burn American flags for fun. Russia is your enemy, pizza face.
You certainly lack a nuanced understanding.
During WW II the United States and the Soviet Union were formal allies whose cooperation was “essential to securing the defeat of Nazi Germany.” Roosevelt admitted he’d “hold hands with the devil” if necessary to beat Hitler. In the Cold War’s aftermath, Washington and Moscow still managed landmark agreements: successive presidents negotiated nuclear arms-control treaties (SALT, START, New START, etc.), and the New START treaty signed in 2010 was extended by both sides in 2021. These legally binding accords and dialogues show that, even amid rivalry, pragmatic U.S.–Russia engagement continues. Ignoring such history – and the fact that national interests often dictate cooperation over enmity – makes the claim that Russia is America’s unambiguous enemy intellectually dishonest and historically inaccurate.
Today’s strategic debate likewise rejects black‐and‐white thinking. Leading security figures urge that the U.S. must deal with “Russia as it is, not as we wish it to be,” blending firm deterrence with open channels of diplomacy. This pragmatic posture accords with international law and treaty commitments: NATO’s founding treaty (Article 5) obliges members to defend any ally that is attacked, reflecting a purely defensive pact rather than a vow of permanent aggression. Civilian and scientific ties also endure – Russia has committed to stay on the International Space Station through 2028 – which hardly fits the narrative of an implacable enemy. And in America’s own system, vigorous public debate is a democratic right, not a crime; civil liberties advocates remind us that “dissent is a form of patriotism.” Branding careful analysts as “naïve” or “traitorous” for questioning policy ignores these legal, historical, and strategic nuances. In a democracy, scrutiny of foreign-policy labels is not treason – it’s a cornerstone of informed citizenship.
Wanna keep talking in circles about it? I'm guessing you're a minority or something? LGBQT+? What's your ACTUAL beef? We all know Russia is America's enemy.
Elon Musk fires everyone investigating him, misses his DOGE goal by 2 trillion dollars, steals all the data, and gets billions from America and foreign contracts. Then says “I am done giving money to politics for now.”
Right on time, Nancy. Just get home from your job and turned on the view, did ya? Looks like you're spreading more BS.
Musk's projects are publicly reported, not secret handouts.
No credible source shows Musk or his companies illegally exfiltrating government data.
DOGE’s official tracker shows roughly $160 billion in claimed savings. This is a lot of money. Musk revised his target; it’s misleading to say he “missed by $2 trillion” as if a fixed goal was blown. What effort was made by Biden?
There’s no evidence Musk personally “fired” anyone investigating him. News reports show it was President Trump’s administration that replaced dozens of oversight officials (inspectors general) across agencies that had probed Musk’s companies. Musk himself said he would recuse himself from conflicts, and he has no authority to unilaterally fire federal investigators. The claim seems to confuse Trump’s actions with something Musk did himself.
What mistake? Who made a mistake? You? Where? How do you know it was a mistake? What correction did you make? Can you like elaborate on any of this sh!t? We're supposed to just sit here and decipher your goofball musings for you? Jesus Christ, this is a high level message board, not some fvcking patchouli potluck. No one has time for this sh!t.
ER don't ever change. I need you. We need you. LRC needs you.
During WW II the United States and the Soviet Union were formal allies whose cooperation was “essential to securing the defeat of Nazi Germany.” Roosevelt admitted he’d “hold hands with the devil” if necessary to beat Hitler. In the Cold War’s aftermath, Washington and Moscow still managed landmark agreements: successive presidents negotiated nuclear arms-control treaties (SALT, START, New START, etc.), and the New START treaty signed in 2010 was extended by both sides in 2021. These legally binding accords and dialogues show that, even amid rivalry, pragmatic U.S.–Russia engagement continues. Ignoring such history – and the fact that national interests often dictate cooperation over enmity – makes the claim that Russia is America’s unambiguous enemy intellectually dishonest and historically inaccurate.
Today’s strategic debate likewise rejects black‐and‐white thinking. Leading security figures urge that the U.S. must deal with “Russia as it is, not as we wish it to be,” blending firm deterrence with open channels of diplomacy. This pragmatic posture accords with international law and treaty commitments: NATO’s founding treaty (Article 5) obliges members to defend any ally that is attacked, reflecting a purely defensive pact rather than a vow of permanent aggression. Civilian and scientific ties also endure – Russia has committed to stay on the International Space Station through 2028 – which hardly fits the narrative of an implacable enemy. And in America’s own system, vigorous public debate is a democratic right, not a crime; civil liberties advocates remind us that “dissent is a form of patriotism.” Branding careful analysts as “naïve” or “traitorous” for questioning policy ignores these legal, historical, and strategic nuances. In a democracy, scrutiny of foreign-policy labels is not treason – it’s a cornerstone of informed citizenship.
Wanna keep talking in circles about it? I'm guessing you're a minority or something? LGBQT+? What's your ACTUAL beef? We all know Russia is America's enemy.
I answered you yesterday. I am a rich white conservative Christian male business owner, Ivy League educated. Thanks once again for asking and deflecting all of the factual data I have supplied to you in exchange for bitter name calling. We have worked with and continue to work with Russia on a number of things, negating any claims of enmity. The recent aggression formed out of the left's psychotic hatred against anything rational coming from the right. If you want to be a toad, troll, flamer, baiter, enjoy yourself. But no one really takes the whacked out crystal meth replies very seriously.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
What mistake? Who made a mistake? You? Where? How do you know it was a mistake? What correction did you make? Can you like elaborate on any of this sh!t? We're supposed to just sit here and decipher your goofball musings for you? Jesus Christ, this is a high level message board, not some fvcking patchouli potluck. No one has time for this sh!t.
ER don't ever change. I need you. We need you. LRC needs you.