Down goes the Dow

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

No, I have been on to you all along....loser....

Though your honesty is appreciated, you are not required to sign your posts.

Too bad you can’t seem to understand the most elementary financial concepts. That’s OK, your financial illiteracy keeps the fake market moving up, for now. Good job.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Too bad you can’t seem to understand the most elementary financial concepts.

Yet you’re the guy who thinks net income is the same as EPS.

U. R. Stupid wrote:

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Too bad you can’t seem to understand the most elementary financial concepts.

Yet you’re the guy who thinks net income is the same as EPS.

That's clearly not what he said. His comment follows:

"If you examine it you will see that “ earnings” is an EPS number derived from Net Income and share count."

Too nuanced for you, genius?

UR Really Stupid wrote:

U. R. Stupid wrote:

Yet you’re the guy who thinks net income is the same as EPS.

That's clearly not what he said. His comment follows:

"If you examine it you will see that “ earnings” is an EPS number derived from Net Income and share count."

Too nuanced for you, genius?

U R right it is too nuanced. Like I said fake markets depend on dopes like this.

Igy

UR Really Stupid wrote:

U. R. Stupid wrote:

Yet you’re the guy who thinks net income is the same as EPS.

That's clearly not what he said. His comment follows:

"If you examine it you will see that “ earnings” is an EPS number derived from Net Income and share count."

Too nuanced for you, genius?

Did you stop reading there, or did you bother with the definition of “net income”?

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

UR Really Stupid wrote:

That's clearly not what he said. His comment follows:

"If you examine it you will see that “ earnings” is an EPS number derived from Net Income and share count."

Too nuanced for you, genius?

U R right it is too nuanced. Like I said fake markets depend on dopes like this.

Igy

It’s not nuanced at all. It’s flat out wrong.

EPS stands for “earnings per share” which is a unit rate derived by taking the quotient of earnings and shares. Therefore it’s mathematically impossible for “earnings” to be the same as EPS.

If that arithmetic is too complicated for you, you may want to repeat 6th grade.

Listen dweeb I explained the question in a pefectly clear way, and what was seved as a response had little to do with the question at hand. But of course that is your childish game. Like I said the fake markets depend on idiots like you. Are your so ignorant that you don’t even know how the non-GAAP earnings report served up by Earnie is derived? Well you can start your education by actually looking at Howard Silverblatt’s S&P 500 spreedsheet served up weekly during earnings season.

Your use of insults and attempts to divert the discussion only solidify the fact that you were wrong. You would do yourself and everyone else here a favor by no longer posting. Your trolling distracts from the serious discussion at hand. Keep silent, read, and learn.

Sure. You and your ilk deserve insults. Like the dope you are.

Keep silent, read, and learn.

Bury your head in the sand, take opiods, you are to lost to learn.

Keep silent, read, and learn.

Financial Advisor wrote:

Keep silent, read, and learn.

Keep silent, read, and learn.

Keep silent, read, and learn.

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/default/files/inline-images/1-Shiller-P-E-768x332.png?itok=CBOq_-ox

I thought you preferred forward looking analysis.

Go, Pats!

Ghost of Igloi wrote:

Too bad you can’t seem to understand the most elementary financial concepts. That’s OK, your financial illiteracy keeps the fake market moving up, for now. Good job.

You're so arrogant! Whether it's this thread or the Grandmaster's running thread, you think you know-it-all!