Dumborats LIED wrote:
Republicons LIED wrote:
0/10
I am not LL, Hardloper.
It is Trumpcare, and it has been since January 2017.
It's from Obamacare sissy boy. Do try to get your facts straight. Deductibles went up during Obama's corrupt win to be President twice...cheated with illegal voters, millions! Only a freeloading Dumborat would think otherwise.
Whoa! Amazing analysis and critical thinking on display ^here. Where did you go to grad school? I want to go to there so I can be smart too.
Flagpole wrote:
Donald J. Trump is a grade A a$$hole, and I'm finding it harder and harder not to think of his remaining supporters as the same.
All other questions aside, why do so many people on LRC seem to have trouble spelling "asshole"?
I don't think it's a great choice of vocabulary--there are other options that I think foster a more civil discussion--but if you're going to use the word, why not spell it correctly?
Flagpole: Useful idiot.
GG3 wrote:
L L wrote:
No one said healthcare costs would go down by $2,500 per year per family.
That is simply a lie. Very Trumpish.
No one said that MANY people's deductibles would go from $1200 to $5000!!, Obama simply lied. Very Obamish of you LL.
No one said that MANY people's deductibles would go from $1200 to $50,000 without Obamacare.
But under Obamacare, NOBODY is allowed to have a policy with lifetime limits. My mother in law had terminal cancer before Obamacare. If she had lived just a little longer the whole family would have gone bankrupt.
Under Obamacare, NOBODY has to worry about that any more.
E. Smilde is a Calvin Alum wrote:
Dumborats LIED wrote:
It's from Obamacare sissy boy. Do try to get your facts straight. Deductibles went up during Obama's corrupt win to be President twice...cheated with illegal voters, millions! Only a freeloading Dumborat would think otherwise.
Whoa! Amazing analysis and critical thinking on display ^here. Where did you go to grad school? I want to go to there so I can be smart too.
The irony is, I'm not very smart and didn't even get my bachelors degree, so...I got that going for me.
Yeah, Obama did lie and he did send deductibles sky high (which he promised wouldn't happen).
But it didn't take a toll on people like me as I benefited from free health care, which basically means your high deductibles paid for me.
Yeah, I guess I do suck off the system.
Obrother wrote:
Dumborats LIED wrote:
It's from Obamacare sissy boy. Do try to get your facts straight. Deductibles went up during Obama's corrupt win to be President twice...cheated with illegal voters, millions! Only a freeloading Dumborat would think otherwise.
At least I was able to keep my doctor.
What it boils down to is conservatives jumped on Obama’s throat over a couple of lies and semantics, some numbskulls even calling to remove him. Not even half way through his first term, Trump lied well more than 3,000X (that’s just what has been documented) and conservatives don’t mind.
Trollminator wrote:
Obrother wrote:
At least I was able to keep my doctor.
What it boils down to is conservatives jumped on Obama’s throat over a couple of lies and semantics, some numbskulls even calling to remove him. Not even half way through his first term, Trump lied well more than 3,000X (that’s just what has been documented) and conservatives don’t mind.
What does Trump have to do with all of Obama's lies and dishonesty?
Fat hurts wrote:
GG3 wrote:
No one said that MANY people's deductibles would go from $1200 to $5000!!, Obama simply lied. Very Obamish of you LL.
No one said that MANY people's deductibles would go from $1200 to $50,000 without Obamacare.
But under Obamacare, NOBODY is allowed to have a policy with lifetime limits. My mother in law had terminal cancer before Obamacare. If she had lived just a little longer the whole family would have gone bankrupt.
Under Obamacare, NOBODY has to worry about that any more.
Remember, it's Trumpcare, you dolt. You can thank Trump for that.
Trollminator wrote:
Obrother wrote:
At least I was able to keep my doctor.
What it boils down to is conservatives jumped on Obama’s throat over a couple of lies and semantics, some numbskulls even calling to remove him. Not even half way through his first term, Trump lied well more than 3,000X (that’s just what has been documented) and conservatives don’t mind.
What's a couple of lies and semantics? LOLZ
Flagpole wrote:
I have no need to change my opinion or tactic on this subject whatsoever. I am both righteous and kind.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Your zealotry on the matter amuses and impresses me. I will enjoy a grand "I Told You So" more than an epic LRC shaming, so I hope you are right!
Trump Lie #3000+++ wrote:
Donald Trump: "No one respects women more than I do." LOL . . . Liar Trump.
Trump viciously attacked a woman at a Wednesday meeting.
Homeland Security Secretary Was Close to Resigning After Trump Berated Her
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/10/us/politics/trump-homeland-security-secretary-resign.html
To be fair, verbally attacking a woman just like he would any man COULD show that he respects women because he isn't pulling any punches. His problem with regard to not respecting women is that he grabs them by the pvssy, and he constantly refers to how they look.
I love hearing HRC supporters railing about the amorality of Trump.
Makes me giggle.
Racket wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I have no need to change my opinion or tactic on this subject whatsoever. I am both righteous and kind.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Your zealotry on the matter amuses and impresses me. I will enjoy a grand "I Told You So" more than an epic LRC shaming, so I hope you are right!
I will accept your "zealot" label, but not in the ways that is usually meant. Usually people apply that to people who have uncompromising religious or political ideals. I do not fall into either category there because...
...my beef with Donald Trump is neither based in religion or politics, but rule of law. I do not care that he is a Republican. There are many Republicans I respect. I care only that he clearly doesn't respect the rule of law and as a result he is bad for America.
If you want to put that in a category of "politics", I won't disagree, but just to be clear, my attacking of him has nothing to do with the fact that he is a Republican and I normally vote Democrat. He was a Democrat most of his adult life and in many ways still has some liberal ideals. If he had peddled his nonsense to Democrats and was elected President as a Democrat, I would be railing against him just as hard...maybe even harder as I would fear my party was going to go the way of the Dodo.
Flagpole wrote:
...my beef with Donald Trump is neither based in religion or politics, but rule of law. I do not care that he is a Republican. There are many Republicans I respect. I care only that he clearly doesn't respect the rule of law and as a result he is bad for America.
If you want to put that in a category of "politics", I won't disagree, but just to be clear, my attacking of him has nothing to do with the fact that he is a Republican and I normally vote Democrat. He was a Democrat most of his adult life and in many ways still has some liberal ideals. If he had peddled his nonsense to Democrats and was elected President as a Democrat, I would be railing against him just as hard...maybe even harder as I would fear my party was going to go the way of the Dodo.
WRONG!!!
On the Level wrote:
I love hearing HRC supporters railing about the amorality of Trump.
Makes me giggle.
Where are these HRC supporters you speak of? Is she running for something?
1) You Trumpers can't get past Hillary Clinton. It is really ridiculous. She became yesterday's news the second the election was called for Trump. Those of us (the smart ones) who are against Trump are so due to his actions both before and since becoming President. Has nothing whatsoever to do with Hillary Clinton.
2) Trump is amoral for sure. Doesn't mean that others aren't. Just means that he is...demonstrably so. The problem for Trump is that his amorality has led to criminal behavior. His stupid supporters, including Christian conservatives, have decided to look the other way on his moral transgressions, but fortunately we are still a rule of law nation, and he will be punished.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
LRC Bro wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
...my beef with Donald Trump is neither based in religion or politics, but rule of law. I do not care that he is a Republican. There are many Republicans I respect. I care only that he clearly doesn't respect the rule of law and as a result he is bad for America.
If you want to put that in a category of "politics", I won't disagree, but just to be clear, my attacking of him has nothing to do with the fact that he is a Republican and I normally vote Democrat. He was a Democrat most of his adult life and in many ways still has some liberal ideals. If he had peddled his nonsense to Democrats and was elected President as a Democrat, I would be railing against him just as hard...maybe even harder as I would fear my party was going to go the way of the Dodo.
WRONG!!!
Oh...ok. You made me clearly see the error of my ways there.
Flagpole wrote:
On the Level wrote:
I love hearing HRC supporters railing about the amorality of Trump.
Makes me giggle.
Where are these HRC supporters you speak of? Is she running for something?
1) You Trumpers can't get past Hillary Clinton. It is really ridiculous. She became yesterday's news the second the election was called for Trump. Those of us (the smart ones) who are against Trump are so due to his actions both before and since becoming President. Has nothing whatsoever to do with Hillary Clinton.
2) Trump is amoral for sure. Doesn't mean that others aren't. Just means that he is...demonstrably so. The problem for Trump is that his amorality has led to criminal behavior. His stupid supporters, including Christian conservatives, have decided to look the other way on his moral transgressions, but fortunately we are still a rule of law nation, and he will be punished.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Voters had two choices between two amoral major party candidates. Just because HRC lost doesn't mean her amorality goes away or doesn't mean anything.
Do you agree that HRC is amoral?
Plus, according to you, Trump is an illegitimate POTUS. The amoral HRC will be put in power soon. Afterall, Mueller is coming, right?
On the Level wrote:
The amoral HRC will be put in power soon.
Hmmmm. If Pence resigned and Trump appointed Hillary as VP, then got impeached and removed from office, then HRC would be president.
Or! If Hillary, ran for the House of Representatives suddenly for 2018, won a seat AND Democrats won a majority, then got voted to be speaker of the house, then Trump AND Pence got impeached and removed from office, then she'd be president.
Either scenarios are of great amusement to me.
Flagpole wrote:
On the Level wrote:
I love hearing HRC supporters railing about the amorality of Trump.
Makes me giggle.
Where are these HRC supporters you speak of? Is she running for something?
1) You Trumpers can't get past Hillary Clinton. It is really ridiculous. She became yesterday's news the second the election was called for Trump. Those of us (the smart ones) who are against Trump are so due to his actions both before and since becoming President. Has nothing whatsoever to do with Hillary Clinton.
2) Trump is amoral for sure. Doesn't mean that others aren't. Just means that he is...demonstrably so. The problem for Trump is that his amorality has led to criminal behavior. His stupid supporters, including Christian conservatives, have decided to look the other way on his moral transgressions, but fortunately we are still a rule of law nation, and he will be punished.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
1) People can still support Clinton even if she is not running. There are supporters out there saying she should be POTUS because of Russian collusion, won the popular vote, etc.
2) She's not yesterday's news. According to her supporters, Dems, and other idiots, she is the legitimate POTUS. Do you not agree. Trump did steal the election after all.
3) If it turns out that Trump is not done, will you never post on this message board again? It is a slam dunk right? Mueller is coming. The clown is done.
Hello all, I just woke up from a coma the last 2 years and have no idea whats going on. Could someone fill me in please?
From what I've read, only in the last ten minutes, it seems there have been MAJOR developments in foreign policy.
1. North Korea has been testing weapons this year at a rate not seen before, and now the say they have nuclear capability and want to negotiate as a world power! What the hell went wrong?
2. Iran says their going to resume nuclear weapons development? What the hell happened? Before I hit my head they were filling in their reactors with concrete and had dismantled their program.
That's all I know from the last 10 minutes of reading, but I'll be back with more questions. Thanks all