solikeliterallylikelikelike wrote:
I've read this entire thread and can summarize as follows:
A: You're stupid
B: No, You're stupid
And so on.
Pretty much.
It’s not that difficult: He should have never touched her. Never ever. I would have been ok with her punching the guy in the face in response but the arrest works, I guess.
Seattle Grey Hair wrote:
Yeah, that clip of the Notre Dame women is completely irrelevant. One would expect that the incident in that clip reveals something that happens from time to time among the teammates, and their is at least an implied permission. The case of the female reporter has no element of permission, familiarity, or custom. It is unwanted touching and not gentle. If I guy walked up to me and punched me in the chest, I could pursue and assault charge.
That said, it shouldn't, and won't, result in imprisonment of the runner.
I don't agree! I sent my daughter to a Catholic University to get away from perverted acts like this within the team environment. If you think what happened at the end of the ND video is acceptable, well then, you have a wildly different view point than I do! I guess we need a list of acceptable and unacceptable butt slapping so everyone is on the same page...
Not to my daughter wrote:
I sent my daughter to a Catholic University to get away from perverted acts like this
You are obviously way too sheltered. Those Catholic priests are 100x more perverted than anyone else.
Not to my daughter wrote:
Seattle Grey Hair wrote:
Yeah, that clip of the Notre Dame women is completely irrelevant. One would expect that the incident in that clip reveals something that happens from time to time among the teammates, and their is at least an implied permission. The case of the female reporter has no element of permission, familiarity, or custom. It is unwanted touching and not gentle. If I guy walked up to me and punched me in the chest, I could pursue and assault charge.
That said, it shouldn't, and won't, result in imprisonment of the runner.
I don't agree! I sent my daughter to a Catholic University to get away from perverted acts like this within the team environment. If you think what happened at the end of the ND video is acceptable, well then, you have a wildly different view point than I do! I guess we need a list of acceptable and unacceptable butt slapping so everyone is on the same page...
0/10
public image management v. criminal defense wrote:
Non-registered users may post here wrote:
Thomas Callaway was booked for misdemeanor sexual battery and was released on $1,300 bond. If convicted, he faces a max sentence of up to 12 months behind bars and up to a $5,000 fine.
Looks like the reporter isn't letting this one go.
https://www.tmz.com/2019/12/14/reporter-butt-slap-runner-5k-race-arrested-charged-sexual-battery/I do not believe there actually is any film footage of said butt slap.
Is Callaway familiar with John Nash's Game Theory, specifically Prisoner's Dilemma.
Callaway's public apology was a public confession. Before Callaway's public apology, there was not Beyond Reasonable Doubt evidence for a criminal case. Callaway's public confession gave D.A. a criminal case. There was not enough evidence for criminal case before apology.
Dumbest comment so far, but more to go.
Acceptable and unacceptable might be as simple as permission, relationships and context.
And to suggest that the butt slapping in the ND clip shows perversion displays a world view far out of the norm.
We can agree that we have a different point of view.
Remember when FloTrack had to cut some clips from a workout video, because it showed the Harvard constantly touching one of his female athletes?
I don't think that guy ended up in jail. FloTrack even helped him to remove the evidence.
https://www.flotrack.org/video/5638483-workout-wednesday-22-harvard-women-3x3k
https://www.reddit.com/r/AdvancedRunning/comments/58e7w8/coachathlete_relationships/
People looooooove bringing up other incidents that aren't remotely comparable.
How did the reporter handle herself so well? She stood there looking shocked with her mouth agape. If some idiot slapped me in the rear, I'd wallop him so hard his sorry ass would reach the finish line before his feet.
boring, correct answer wrote:
So you don't understand logic at all and just assert whatever you want. Shame.
Yes, you are boring and here's the correct answer. A lesson in simple logic:
- You say support for A does not infer support for B. That's correct, as far as it goes.
- But if B is a necessary consequence of A (as a given penalty is of a prosecution) then support for A logically includes B. If you do not support B then you cannot support A without finding yourself in a contradiction. If you express no view about B but support A then the necessary inference will be that you support B also. (The latter is where you find yourself.)
You're welcome (although I don't expect you will have followed that, since you only appear to grasp your initial statement without the qualifying condition.)
cathylovestorun wrote:
How did the reporter handle herself so well? She stood there looking shocked with her mouth agape. If some idiot slapped me in the rear, I'd wallop him so hard his sorry ass would reach the finish line before his feet.
Congratulations. You will have responded to a sexual assault with an aggravated assault. You would face the greater penalty.
You are hopeless. That worthless write-up is not evident of the discussion brought up. But keep telling yourself that’s because I am incapable of “getting it”, hahaha.
boring, correct answer wrote:
You are hopeless. That worthless write-up is not evident of the discussion brought up. But keep telling yourself that’s because I am incapable of “getting it”, hahaha.
But I don't have to keep telling myself that. You're good at continuing to show it.
Be better. Nah - forget it.
Armstronglivs wrote:
cathylovestorun wrote:
How did the reporter handle herself so well? She stood there looking shocked with her mouth agape. If some idiot slapped me in the rear, I'd wallop him so hard his sorry ass would reach the finish line before his feet.
Congratulations. You will have responded to a sexual assault with an aggravated assault. You would face the greater penalty.
Maybe, but it would be soooo worth the penalty.
cathylovestorun wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Congratulations. You will have responded to a sexual assault with an aggravated assault. You would face the greater penalty.
Maybe, but it would be soooo worth the penalty.
And then he would be entirely justified to beat you up to defend himself. You are stupid for thinking you are such a hot shot fighter. Be better.
You Think Too Highly of Yourself wrote:
cathylovestorun wrote:
Maybe, but it would be soooo worth the penalty.
And then he would be entirely justified to beat you up to defend himself. You are stupid for thinking you are such a hot shot fighter. Be better.
Wouldn't happen. He's a coward at heart, just like you.
cathylovestorun wrote:
Wouldn't happen. He's a coward at heart, just like you.
Your fat SJW butt wouldn't even be able to keep up with him. I would get in between him and you and let you punch me for a bit, enough to get some good video, and then I would sue your butt back to King Kong and bankrupt you. I would then post it on social media and say how you "took my power!"
Be Better! wrote:
cathylovestorun wrote:
Wouldn't happen. He's a coward at heart, just like you.
Your fat SJW butt wouldn't even be able to keep up with him. I would get in between him and you and let you punch me for a bit, enough to get some good video, and then I would sue your butt back to King Kong and bankrupt you. I would then post it on social media and say how you "took my power!"
Spoken like a true coward. You wouldn't garner my attention whatsoever. Your pathetic attempts to be noticed would just elicit my pity and disgust.
cathylovestorun wrote:
Be Better! wrote:
Your fat SJW butt wouldn't even be able to keep up with him. I would get in between him and you and let you punch me for a bit, enough to get some good video, and then I would sue your butt back to King Kong and bankrupt you. I would then post it on social media and say how you "took my power!"
Spoken like a true coward. You wouldn't garner my attention whatsoever. Your pathetic attempts to be noticed would just elicit my pity and disgust.
Just a minute ago you were threatening to beat someone up and now you are chicken because you know I would intervene and get rich off you. You are not very smart
Be Better! wrote:
cathylovestorun wrote:
Spoken like a true coward. You wouldn't garner my attention whatsoever. Your pathetic attempts to be noticed would just elicit my pity and disgust.
Just a minute ago you were threatening to beat someone up and now you are chicken because you know I would intervene and get rich off you. You are not very smart
On the contrary, coward. I am wholly capable of defending myself and smart enough to know you pose no threat to me whatsoever even on your best day. Now buzz off you annoying little gnat.