Fighting Roster Limits in House v NCAA settlement

title ix really needs to just drop football from it's overall numbers..should really just be it's own thing.

This rule is bogus

Oh my god. It's not that complicated lol.

Lol we are a good team with 9 scholarships and 17 roster spots. We used to be a good team with 9 scholarships and 12 spots. Obviously that money is also spread out over track too. Our administration recognizes we are successful and wanted to "feed the beast"

We have a few women's only sports here that cover the roster for football. I won't name them because I'd rather not identify our school. Way too many creepy people here.

I don't know if other sports are losing numbers so accommodate us, I just know we gained 5 spots and have the full 45 for men's and women's track as well.

Does this mean 9 scholarships for xc & track?

or 9 for distance and 3.6 for other track events? ie. a currently fully funded track/xc program?

You are digging a deeper grave on every subsequent post. NAU, Iowa State, BYU, Wisconsin, North Carolina, and the other elite distance programs all have fewer than 9 distance scholarships. Yet your school has 12 guys on 9 scholarships? Wow. You either have the worst coach in the NCAA or you are completely in the dark.

I have to keep circling back and repeating things that I've already covered in my posts. I'm not doing that anymore. Too many of you have so much free time that you're trying to "gotcha!" everything I say. The more I explain our situation the more people think I'm lying lol Funny how that works, since most of you have already been wrong on a lot of your title 9 assumptions and other things.

I'm no longer going to keep arguing with people on here because I don't have time for that. It's actually kind of immature and I'm supposed to be the "20 year old."

We gained 5 spots in cross country. You guys can speculate on how that's possible by reading my posts on here over and over again and I'll be enjoying our administration believing in our program. I'm sorry some of you are so miserable that you can't even accept good news when you hear it.

Just to clear up any confusion, it's 7,000 scholarships for xc only and 12 million for the track program. Our budget is 45 billion and title 9 means we can only have 1 male on the team.

As was stated, there isn't a program in the NCAA putting 9 scholarships into distance. You are quite confused by your continuation down this path.

Read my other posts about how it is "obviously spread out to track"

Yes, I said that already. You just can't read. Not returning to this crap thread now if every time I tell the truth someone tries to argue with me.

Yeah its not that as difficult as others make it seem. Crew, volleyball (if theres no mens team) field hockey, and soon flag football...boom, done.

https://www.bizjournals.com/baltimore/news/2025/03/11/morgan-state-ncaa-house-settlement-sports.html

Morgan State University plans to grow its Olympic sports and women's sports teams, while cutting the size of its football roster, after opting into a national agreement to pay student-athletes directly.

Currently, MSU has 19 on the men and 24 on the women track teams.

XC had 6 on the men and 7 on the women.

I will be back to bump this thread when or if the new roster limits allow them to increase numbers. The only way to prove this argument is to wait and actually SEE it. But i believe the young man talking about his own school’s experience is correct. Some schools who previously had self imposed limits will be able to increase.

It’s obviously one poster posting under a ton of different names…

probably some schools will decide to increase but they always could have.

Title IX should be completely rethought in terms of collegiate roster spots and scholarships because boys and girls are different and girls number boys 60-40 at colleges now. It was good to encourage girls to realize they can do sports - but we really need awkward reverse DEI to get a better ratio of males into college, and more male sports roster spots would be a low hanging fruit way to do that.

random google hit quote:

“In 2021, there were 2.4 million fewer men than women pursuing undergraduate degrees, with approximately 8.9 million women compared to 6.5 million men.”

Why? It is a sport no more/no less than tennis.

1. It generates revenue - no other sport (other than men's basketball) does

2. There's no female equivalent so it's unfair to male potential student-athletes.

1