We've merged a ton of threads into 1. Other thread titles included, "The Pagan Olympics" another was called, "France Summed up in 1 picture", "Paris 2024: Child R*pist athlete, Satanic Opening Ceremony, Drag queens gyrating next to young girls..." and “Does not wanting my kids to watch a bisexual threesome at the Olympics make me a bigot?”
What? Why wouldn't French drag queens mock Islam? Lots of people mock Islam. Islam is easily mocked. I mock Islam whenever the occasion arises. Don't you mock Islam?
And keep in mind this is France we're talking about. They won't even let Islamics wear their turbans at the Olympics. I'd bet French drag queens would have no problem whatsoever mocking Islam, if they were asked to.
Their Islams citizens would go mad and destroy France. They know the Christians would be able to restrain themselves.
Well, I don't know if Christians are restraining themselves so much as they are timid by nature. But whatever. I do agree that Islamics have a pronounced tendency to fly off the handle in hysterical rages at the slightest perceived provocation. It's part of their religion. But France can handle that. They banned the Islamic turban and suppressed all the ensuing riots. France could handle the Islamic rage from a Mohammed drag queen skit. This guy is not as tough as he tries to look.
This horrendous display of hatred (sooo obvious to one inured to such disgusting emotions) for the one true religion by these liberal groomers (I could go into detail, but I will not give them the additional publicity they crave) from the most arrogant (the Gauls wrongly think they are better than us after we saved them from the Germans twice) country on earth (and their food is not nearly as nourishing as our own homegrown American diet) is an abomination.
The God I know and love would have welcomed EVERYBODY - Drag queens included to the last supper table
I think the people in Sodom and Gomorrah would disagree with you
You might want to read your Bible again. One point is that some scholars contend that a great crime of those people was against hospitality there than being primarily sexual. Another point is that you don’t seem too distraught about the circumstances of the righteous man who was spared: Lot. God designated him as the rare righteous man, and He spared him in part to keep a promise to Abraham.
So this good man, Lot, provided protection to the foreigners under his roof (angels). How? When other residents demanded that they be allowed to have sex with them (there is a lot to deal with in that detail alone), Lot told them to spare the men and have his two virgin daughters in their stead. I get it: maybe you aren’t against panderers and groomers.
And as part of the punishment and the sparing of the righteous? God saved Lot and his daughters, but Lot’s wife — as many remember — was turned into a pillar of salt.
Why spare them, then? And how to continue the righteous family line? Simple: Just have Lot’s daughters get him drunk, sleep with him, and bear his children.
Man, I can’t believe the French are so icky in the behaviors they display!
You might want to read your Bible again. One point is that some scholars contend that a great crime of those people was against hospitality there than being primarily sexual. Another point is that you don’t seem too distraught about the circumstances of the righteous man who was spared: Lot. God designated him as the rare righteous man, and He spared him in part to keep a promise to Abraham.
So this good man, Lot, provided protection to the foreigners under his roof (angels). How? When other residents demanded that they be allowed to have sex with them (there is a lot to deal with in that detail alone), Lot told them to spare the men and have his two virgin daughters in their stead. I get it: maybe you aren’t against panderers and groomers.
And as part of the punishment and the sparing of the righteous? God saved Lot and his daughters, but Lot’s wife — as many remember — was turned into a pillar of salt.
Why spare them, then? And how to continue the righteous family line? Simple: Just have Lot’s daughters get him drunk, sleep with him, and bear his children.
Man, I can’t believe the French are so icky in the behaviors they display!
Again, the point is when and where the French and you weirdo liberals display your icky behaviors. I would never want to take your right away of prancing around in your wife's bra and panties, making out with three other guys at the same time, exposing your scrotum to religious symbols, covering your naked body in paint and rolling around in glitter, just maybe not do it where children could see you.
I think the people in Sodom and Gomorrah would disagree with you
You might want to read your Bible again. One point is that some scholars contend that a great crime of those people was against hospitality there than being primarily sexual. Another point is that you don’t seem too distraught about the circumstances of the righteous man who was spared: Lot. God designated him as the rare righteous man, and He spared him in part to keep a promise to Abraham.
So this good man, Lot, provided protection to the foreigners under his roof (angels). How? When other residents demanded that they be allowed to have sex with them (there is a lot to deal with in that detail alone), Lot told them to spare the men and have his two virgin daughters in their stead. I get it: maybe you aren’t against panderers and groomers.
And as part of the punishment and the sparing of the righteous? God saved Lot and his daughters, but Lot’s wife — as many remember — was turned into a pillar of salt.
Why spare them, then? And how to continue the righteous family line? Simple: Just have Lot’s daughters get him drunk, sleep with him, and bear his children.
Man, I can’t believe the French are so icky in the behaviors they display!
I didn't really read all this, i just want to say that you are gay
Again, the point is when and where the French and you weirdo liberals display your icky behaviors. I would never want to take your right away of prancing around in your wife's bra and panties, making out with three other guys at the same time, exposing your scrotum to religious symbols, covering your naked body in paint and rolling around in glitter, just maybe not do it where children could see you.
I suppose pigs have a right to roll in the mud and then we eat them, but it seems a bit "icky" to me, as well as seeing adults dress up in weird costumes pretending this is a natural thing to do at the opening of the Olympics. The message is clear....decadence has no leaders, only followers.
This horrendous display of hatred (sooo obvious to one inured to such disgusting emotions) for the one true religion by these liberal groomers (I could go into detail, but I will not give them the additional publicity they crave) from the most arrogant (the Gauls wrongly think they are better than us after we saved them from the Germans twice) country on earth (and their food is not nearly as nourishing as our own homegrown American diet) is an abomination.
These boards truly are a cesspool of uniquely American reactionary anti-intellectualism.
Maybe the best way to view these vignettes is as a metaphorical depiction of the the decline of Western civilization. From that perspective, the director of the opening ceremonies hit the mark squarely.
On a personal note, there's something about that plump lady with the halo at the center of the table that just makes me smile. She's so pleasantly rotund and serene, with the sheen of sweat accentuating every curve of her absurd corporeal mass. She is the perfect centerpiece for this ridiculous scene.
This horrendous display of hatred (sooo obvious to one inured to such disgusting emotions) for the one true religion by these liberal groomers (I could go into detail, but I will not give them the additional publicity they crave) from the most arrogant (the Gauls wrongly think they are better than us after we saved them from the Germans twice) country on earth (and their food is not nearly as nourishing as our own homegrown American diet) is an abomination.
These boards truly are a cesspool of uniquely American reactionary anti-intellectualism.
Their Islams citizens would go mad and destroy France. They know the Christians would be able to restrain themselves.
Well, I don't know if Christians are restraining themselves so much as they are timid by nature. But whatever. I do agree that Islamics have a pronounced tendency to fly off the handle in hysterical rages at the slightest perceived provocation. It's part of their religion.
Hate to tell you, but there's no such thing as satan. Or god, for that matter. People made those things up thousands of years ago in order to control you. Remarkable that it still works after all these years.
Wow, you better hope you’re right. Those bigoted drag queens sure won’t save you in the end. I’ll pray that you at least think about what you’ve written here.
Mark me down as another one who couldn’t care less about drag queens, but draws the line at religious bigotry.
Also find it hilarious that everyone knows they’d never have the balls to do this other religions. Bigoted cowards.
Anyway, they should have gone with the Mona Lisa. Da Vinci’s The Last Supper is in Milan. It’s not even theirs to sacrilege.
Well, given that christianity has historically contributed more violence, death, and destruction to the world than any other religion, I think they're a fair target. I mean, look at those christians who worship the orange man, who now think that if they vote him in, he'll fix it so they never have to vote again. Pure fascism on display, and they eat it up. Drag queens are the future. Religious people are the past. Evolve or perish.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.
