rbtrackfan wrote:
Henes 14:47 pr, Andrews 15:04?
Andrew’s is done. She did run faster “once”. But when there is major competition and strategy involved she’s not a performer. She doesn’t belong in the 1500 or 5K on a National level let alone international. Maybe her days are over.
This quoted post has been removed.
It'll be on YouTube
broken arrow wrote:
Why was Richardson a DNS in the 100M and Hodgkinson a DNS in the 800M???
Hamstring and illness, respectively
Is it me or did It look like Jackson shut it down!
did jackson shut it down?
Eb55 wrote:
Is it me or did It look like Jackson shut it down!
Looked like it yes, but she was getting 3rd even running through.
Sir Bastion Newbold wrote:
Reekie wins 1.57.30
Sage H-K, DFL. She’s over hyped. Maggie Vessey was significantly better and didn’t get anywhere the attention Sage got.
This should bump Reekie to 3rd and Snowden to 6th on the year lists - amazing run from Katie!
broken arrow wrote:
Why was Richardson a DNS in the 100M and Hodgkinson a DNS in the 800M???
The grippe and lumbago are my guesses.
oaclover443322 wrote:
Adam Spencer 3:31 - Australia's 1500m depth is insane!!! America couldn't understand.
What is depth?
National rank by times for USA/Australia:
1st - 3:29.02 / 3:29.41
3rd - 3:32.61 / 3:31.81
5th - 3:34.24 / 3:34.52
10th - 3:34.63 / 3:37.56
20th - 3:36.85 / 3:40.76
50th - 3:39.40 / 3:46.70
And how many of the top 3 Americans are living and training in Australia?
They’re excellent for a country that’s a fraction of the size of the U.S. though, no doubt. We tend to be fat and lazy over here.
youtube rando guy wrote:
did jackson shut it down?
She realized that nothing she did would catch Ta'Lou or Asher-Smith.
John Wesley Harding wrote:
Gjert “polishing a rough diamond”.
Sure, sure.
Meaning..?
mikehammer wrote:
Roger meyers wrote:
Something is causing the track times from 1,500m to 5,000m to go off the charts this season. Men and women.
Combination of factors
It's become increasingly evident times have now advanced across the board
And I don't believe it's doping although that may be a factor in some performances
What about the older Spanish runner who was coached by jama aden…
Vialsvialsvials wrote:
mikehammer wrote:
Combination of factors
It's become increasingly evident times have now advanced across the board
And I don't believe it's doping although that may be a factor in some performances
What about the older Spanish runner who was coached by jama aden…
Is that you armstronglivs ?
Fun fact #1: Zharnel Hughes' 19.73 makes him the fastest third-placed athlete of all time, smashing Lyles' 19.74 from the Tokyo Olympics.
Fun fact #2: Tebogo's 19.50 puts him #2 on the #2 list, behind Yohan Blakes' 19.44 at the London Olympics.
briguy wrote:
Sir Bastion Newbold wrote:
Reekie wins 1.57.30
Sage H-K, DFL. She’s over hyped. Maggie Vessey was significantly better and didn’t get anywhere the attention Sage got.
Are you serious? Maggie got way more attention.
THOUGHTSLEADER wrote:
Wow. Lyles runs 19.47 and is pushed the whole way. Tebogo monstrous.
Great time. Its a long way from 19.47 to 19.19. He doesn't seem equipped for that journey.
The Insider wrote:
It was actually a really good run from Hocker, considering he didn't run a single step on the rail. He was either outside of lane 1, or lane 2 for the entire race.
How is running in lane 2 a good run? Sounds like horrible tactics to me.
2 posts were removed from this page.