coach wrote:
Currently there are only 9 coaches in the NFL with over 5 years of experience. In the last 5 years how many of the 21 other teams hired black coaches?
6
coach wrote:
Currently there are only 9 coaches in the NFL with over 5 years of experience. In the last 5 years how many of the 21 other teams hired black coaches?
6
Soccer T's wrote:
you've proved yourself a complete KKKlown
By agreeing with Terry Bradshaw about the Steelers... You're a fool.
Like I said.....the concept eludes you.
Soccer T's wrote:
Like I said.....the concept eludes you.
I think you're too dumb to understand what you don't understand...
If you think a league that regularly trots out criminals because they're the best at what they do will only hire inferior coaches because they like their skin color you're a moron.
If Osama Bin Laden could win a team 14 games a year he'd be hired in 15 minutes.
The argument that a league that's 80% black is "racist" is idiotic.
Woke racist morons ruin everything wrote:
Soccer T's wrote:
Like I said.....the concept eludes you.
I think you're too dumb to understand what you don't understand...
If you think a league that regularly trots out criminals because they're the best at what they do will only hire inferior coaches because they like their skin color you're a moron.
If Osama Bin Laden could win a team 14 games a year he'd be hired in 15 minutes.
The argument that a league that's 80% black is "racist" is idiotic.
ok....I'll slow it down for you because you really seem not to get it.
It's not that teams nowday say: "I'm not hiring that guy....he's BLACK! I'd rather have a bad team with a white man coaching than hire a BLACK man!"
No one is saying it's like that. Stop trying to portray it that way.
White people...looking at a list of potential equally qualified candidates.....are most likely to hire the white person. That's just the way it is.
So when you have a league that historically has been very, very white at the top......they are going to keep hiring more white people even when other people are equally qualified.
So yes...like you said...it's a buddy system league. It's a coaching tree league.
White Head coaches are FAR more likely to be white and thus more likely to hire a white person a OC or DC over equally qualified candidates of different races. So HC 'buddies' and 'coaching trees' are more likely to be white.
White people hiring white people hiring white people....it's a buddy system!
Most people understand and acknowledge this. A few, can't seem to wrap their minds around the fact that not all forms of racism involve people who hate black people. Maybe you're one of those holding onto this simplistic notion of racism.
That help?
Capy short finger wrote:
Has a black head coach ever won a Super Bowl? If not, maybe you want to go with a white coach who have won all of them.
This is exactly why white distance runner's should not be commenting on blacks in different sports. This fools thinks that a black head coach has never won the Superbowl.
Soccer T's wrote:
All you KKKlowns are tripping over yourselves to sound the most like the people that explained to us why there were almost no black QBs in the 1980's.
White ignorance repeating itself.
what?????? wrote:
Capy short finger wrote:
Has a black head coach ever won a Super Bowl? If not, maybe you want to go with a white coach who have won all of them.
This is exactly why white distance runner's should not be commenting on blacks in different sports. This fools thinks that a black head coach has never won the Superbowl.
....the bozo a few posts back thinks a black coach who won a Super Bowl AND never had one losing record in his entire career .....should be fired.
White people...looking at a list of potential equally qualified candidates.....are most likely to hire the white person. That's just the way it is.
You're assumptions are racist... In a league with a Rooney rule with an increasingly woke ideology that embraces kneeling for the anthem and the BLM movement it is NOT true to say white people will always be hired if equally qualified.
So when you have a league that historically has been very, very white at the top......they are going to keep hiring more white people even when other people are equally qualified.
White people invented the sport and the country was 90% white when the foundations were laid. What a shock that the people running the league are mostly white...
So yes...like you said...it's a buddy system league. It's a coaching tree league.
White Head coaches are FAR more likely to be white and thus more likely to hire a white person a OC or DC over equally qualified candidates of different races. So HC 'buddies' and 'coaching trees' are more likely to be white.
And you think this is because all the white people are racist... I think it's human nature.
White people hiring white people hiring white people....it's a buddy system!
Mike Tomlin interviewed people for his OC and DC positions. He is outspoken about the league needing more black coaches. He hired 2 white guys. Is he racist?
Most people understand and acknowledge this. A few, can't seem to wrap their minds around the fact that not all forms of racism involve people who hate black people. Maybe you're one of those holding onto this simplistic notion of racism.
You boil everything down to skin color and call other people simplistic.... LOL!
Soccer T's wrote:
what?????? wrote:
This is exactly why white distance runner's should not be commenting on blacks in different sports. This fools thinks that a black head coach has never won the Superbowl.
....the bozo a few posts back thinks a black coach who won a Super Bowl AND never had one losing record in his entire career .....should be fired.
The difference between us is I do not care what color the coach is. If he can win he can win. Tomlin hasn't won a playoff game in 6 years and with Roethlisberger retiring he isn't going to sniff the playoffs again for years.
I think he's overrated. It's my opinion and PLENTY of people who know a hell of a lot more about football than you or I do have the same opinion.
As a poster mentioned earlier he basically CAN'T be fired no matter what happens now because idiots like you will cry racism. Name a white coach who can't be fired because of his skin color.
Yeah, I'm not sure you have the brainpower to understand it.
You seem to immediately turn everything into a shouting match over racism. It's like a weird fetish for you or something. You can't seem to focus enough to even comprehend the conversation.
I'm talking about implicit racial biases in hiring (not just in NFL). It's been well documented for years. It's not exactly new or controversial. If you have ~90% white head coaches, you are going to obviously have a bias toward hiring more whites in your coaching tree....and as your next head coach....especially in your 'buddy system' league. Just the facts.
The proof is on the field. It's a black league...but coached by whites, even though blacks have a better winning percentage as head coaches.
What is even your argument against this? That blacks are somehow worse coaches? Even though they have a better record? That's your argument?
lol....ok buddy.
You: "I don't care about a man's skin color."
Also you: "Dey won't fire the black guy because heeeee's blaaaack!!!!! Waaaahh! Wahhhhh! because he's blaaaaaack!!!
He won the Superbowl and hasn't had one single losing record in fifteen years...an NFL record btw.....and you want him to get fired.
lol...ok.
Soccer T's wrote:
Yeah, I'm not sure you have the brainpower to understand it.
You seem to immediately turn everything into a shouting match over racism. It's like a weird fetish for you or something. You can't seem to focus enough to even comprehend the conversation.
I'm talking about implicit racial biases in hiring (not just in NFL). It's been well documented for years. It's not exactly new or controversial. If you have ~90% white head coaches, you are going to obviously have a bias toward hiring more whites in your coaching tree....and as your next head coach....especially in your 'buddy system' league. Just the facts.
The proof is on the field. It's a black league...but coached by whites, even though blacks have a better winning percentage as head coaches.
What is even your argument against this? That blacks are somehow worse coaches? Even though they have a better record? That's your argument?
lol....ok buddy.
Did Mike Tomlin hire a white OC and DC because he has "implicit racial bias"?
Soccer T's wrote:
You: "I don't care about a man's skin color."
Also you: "Dey won't fire the black guy because heeeee's blaaaack!!!!! Waaaahh! Wahhhhh! because he's blaaaaaack!!!
He won the Superbowl and hasn't had one single losing record in fifteen years...an NFL record btw.....and you want him to get fired.
lol...ok.
He's had a losing record in the playoffs for the last 12 years.
If you are curious, the all-time winning pct ranking is as follows:
Hispanic
Black (slightly over .500)
Whites (under .500)[/quote]
I wasn't curious but you brought it up twice... what's your source for this?
There's been 21 black head coaches as far as I can tell and their record is 1,015-1,017.
Take away Tomlin and Dungy who inherited hall of fame talent up and down their rosters and the other 19 are 705-844
Not that great.
Woke racist morons ruin everything wrote:
Soccer T's wrote:
Yeah, I'm not sure you have the brainpower to understand it.
You seem to immediately turn everything into a shouting match over racism. It's like a weird fetish for you or something. You can't seem to focus enough to even comprehend the conversation.
I'm talking about implicit racial biases in hiring (not just in NFL). It's been well documented for years. It's not exactly new or controversial. If you have ~90% white head coaches, you are going to obviously have a bias toward hiring more whites in your coaching tree....and as your next head coach....especially in your 'buddy system' league. Just the facts.
The proof is on the field. It's a black league...but coached by whites, even though blacks have a better winning percentage as head coaches.
What is even your argument against this? That blacks are somehow worse coaches? Even though they have a better record? That's your argument?
lol....ok buddy.
Did Mike Tomlin hire a white OC and DC because he has "implicit racial bias"?
Good lord.
Are you really this dense?
It's like you need it spoon-fed to you every step of the way.
This is an example of your apparent cognition level:
'Tom Brady just threw an incomplete pass!! You said he was Good! But he's not Good! His pass was incomplete!"
Soccer T's wrote:
Woke racist morons ruin everything wrote:
Did Mike Tomlin hire a white OC and DC because he has "implicit racial bias"?
Good lord.
Are you really this dense?
It's like you need it spoon-fed to you every step of the way.
This is an example of your apparent cognition level:
'Tom Brady just threw an incomplete pass!! You said he was Good! But he's not Good! His pass was incomplete!"
You say the league is racist because white guys just hire their white friends rather than better qualified black coaches...
If this is the case why did a black coach hire two white guys rather than black coaches? if your your assumption that it's only racist white people preventing black coaches from being hired was true Tomlin would have hired 2 black coaches. Tomlin has spoken out on multiple occasions about the leagues lack of diversity in coaching. Why did he not hire black coaches?
You're an idiot.
the beagle wrote:
Could you point me to the studies that show that white football coaches are smarter on average than black football coaches?
Must be hard to find.
Winning is number one...The owner/management will hire the person they think can win....Doesn't matter what he looks like. I know paranoid African Americans think the whole World is against them but again, they are paranoid to the point of mental illness.
the beagle wrote:
the beagle wrote:
Could you point me to the studies that show that white football coaches are smarter on average than black football coaches?
Must be hard to find.
Testing scores from cradle to grave support this.
You're not allowed to talk about it in polite society.
Human abilities are on a bell curve. The overwhelming majority of people are in the middle and the disparities between the races don't exist. The differences are most pronounced at the extremes.
The top 100 fastest marathon times in history are East African. This is not a coincidence.
The top 100 fastest 100m times in history are West African. This is not a coincidence.
When it comes to the extremes in IQ the Africans are no where to be found. This is not a coincidence.
It is political correct nonsense to suggest the races are all identical.
They all have strengths and weaknesses.
Just like men and women are different but equal despite their differences.
It is absurd that you can openly say that black athletes are faster and more agile than any other race but if you suggest that any other race is superior at anything else it's "RACISM"!