blunkered wrote:
"So, you left her on her own and drove straight back home in her car with all her stuff in it?"
Yes.
blunkered wrote:
And her cell phone was powered off as you left her and has not turned on again since.
News to me.
blunkered wrote:
And she didn't walk to any of the adjacent campsites by your campsite to ask for a ride out?"
How would I know?
your parents wrote:
blunkered wrote:
"So, you left her on her own and drove straight back home in her car with all her stuff in it?"
Yes.
blunkered wrote:
And her cell phone was powered off as you left her and has not turned on again since.
News to me.
blunkered wrote:
And she didn't walk to any of the adjacent campsites by your campsite to ask for a ride out?"
How would I know?
FBI: She was murdered.
Murderer Brian: It was a bear. I am certain it was.
FBI: The method of murder is not a bear.
Murderer Brian: That is not my problem.
blunkered wrote:
FBI: She was murdered.
I'm sorry to hear that.
It's crazy how some zoomer vlogger is outsmarting all police, FBI, and the US surveillance state apparatus.
If those other vloggers didn't tell the FBI where the van was parked this would still be a missing person case where the police were saying no known crime was committed.
your parents wrote:
blunkered wrote:
FBI: She was murdered.
I'm sorry to hear that.
The point of the comments is that this guy is incapable of telling the truth. A lie will come out regardless of how non-sensical his response is. Experts who have looked over the 911 video with the police in Wyoming say what they see is an abusive relationship where the guy calmly blames the woman for a fight, and the woman agrees it was her problem and not his.
An outcome of this situation is having people who are good at seeing domestic violence issues on the force to be part of the first response to a situation. Regular police got it wrong by letting them go. A park ranger, who told her she needed to separate from the guy right then and there, was correct, but as seems to be the case in this type of situation, she decided to stay with him and it cost her her life.
Just to be clear, “homicide” does not imply murder, it just means that she was killed by another person. In practice, the only scenario here where it isn’t murder at all is “justifiable homicide” in self defense. Manslaughter or unintentional killing would still be third degree murder and is convictable, albeit with a lower sentence than first to second degree.
brien evans wrote:
It's crazy how some zoomer vlogger is outsmarting all police, FBI, and the US surveillance state apparatus.
If those other vloggers didn't tell the FBI where the van was parked this would still be a missing person case where the police were saying no known crime was committed.
There is a report somewhere of a woman who called the FBI hotline because she saw the guy acting really strange in her van without her in it and at the location her body was found. He spent several days there and it kept freaking her out because the van was empty the times she saw it parked. He stayed at the scene of the crime several days.
I'll see if I can find that report.
brien evans wrote:
It's crazy how some zoomer vlogger is outsmarting all police, FBI, and the US surveillance state apparatus.
What would be really crazy is if he were continuing to vlog while on the run from the police, FBI, and state surveillance.
My point was that you are bad at picking interrogation questions and making up responses.
your parents wrote:
My point was that you are bad at picking interrogation questions and making up responses.
My point being you are were really bad at making up responses to my comments. That part went over your head.
blunkered wrote:
your parents wrote:
My point was that you are bad at picking interrogation questions and making up responses.
My point being you are were really bad at making up responses to my comments. That part went over your head.
Lol you are further proving my point.
your parents wrote:
Lol you are further proving my point.
You didn't make a point. I knew you were trolling, and you got trolled back. And you can handle that, as I expected.
Now, let us see if you can stay on topic.
And you cannot handle that...
blunkered wrote:
https://www.thedailybeast.com/gabby-petito-tipster-recalls-guy-in-van-acting-weird-near-spread-creek-where-body-was-found
While I think he did do it, none of that behavior described sounds sketchy while out camping in a camper-van. Of course there won’t be a campsite set-up, there is a bed in the van. Driving slow, in a van, on a narrow road, around a campsite area…I see that all the time at campsites and sounds par for the course in that setting. I feel like the article could have done a better job at describing any out of the ordinary behavior.
KoyPond wrote:
While I think he did do it, none of that behavior described sounds sketchy while out camping in a camper-van. Of course there won’t be a campsite set-up, there is a bed in the van. Driving slow, in a van, on a narrow road, around a campsite area…I see that all the time at campsites and sounds par for the course in that setting. I feel like the article could have done a better job at describing any out of the ordinary behavior.
The sketchy part is that he was seen alone in the van several days in a row. Of course, at the time people did not know two people should have been seen. Just one weirdo.
lol at people thinking he will never be caught. it might not be as soon as it should be. it could be in 10 year, but he will be caught and him running away is basically an admission of guilt. all they need is a fraction of evidence to charge him with murder and given all the publicity its gotten a jury would convict 100% of the time.
te5n1k wrote:
lol at people thinking he will never be caught. it might not be as soon as it should be. it could be in 10 year, but he will be caught and him running away is basically an admission of guilt. all they need is a fraction of evidence to charge him with murder and given all the publicity its gotten a jury would convict 100% of the time.
The case will be strengthened with murder site and van forensics. They will figure out the path used of travel from the where the van was parked to the murder site. If that path was a one time use (not a used trail) then it should be undisturbed since the murder.
te5n1k wrote:
lol at people thinking he will never be caught. it might not be as soon as it should be. it could be in 10 year, but he will be caught and him running away is basically an admission of guilt. all they need is a fraction of evidence to charge him with murder and given all the publicity its gotten a jury would convict 100% of the time.
He would be convicted because he is guilty and not because of all the publicity the case is receiving.