Just when wrote:
Gruntz wrote:
Just add geography to math and grammar as areas that he has demonstrated underwhelming knowledge.
Just when I think I have seen the clunkiest sentence of all time....
Yes?
Just when wrote:
Gruntz wrote:
Just add geography to math and grammar as areas that he has demonstrated underwhelming knowledge.
Just when I think I have seen the clunkiest sentence of all time....
Yes?
Don’t fight the Fed works in both dire tions:
How about now wrote:
Just when wrote:
Just when I think I have seen the clunkiest sentence of all time....
Yes?
Google AI (Artificial Intelligence) to the rescue:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/gradeproof-proofreading-w/jdfpoahdpflhjfknlmplddpiknmgmlbi?hl=enOh, wait, weren't we just talking about Google...?
seattle prattle wrote:
How about now wrote:
Yes?
Google AI (Artificial Intelligence) to the rescue:
https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/gradeproof-proofreading-w/jdfpoahdpflhjfknlmplddpiknmgmlbi?hl=enOh, wait, weren't we just talking about Google...?
AI....it will change our lives in so many ways. Like tracking the stock buys and sells. Statistically, how many up days on the first trading day after the Fourth? KENSO. Bunch of crap actually. That’s probably why so many investors are seduced by nonsense metrics.
Perhaps you could benefit from seeking the help of a respected investment advisor knowledgable in this area. It has proven to be quite lucrative for many of today's investors. In fact, I believe some of them even frequent this message board.
seattle prattle wrote:
Perhaps you could benefit from seeking the help of a respected investment advisor knowledgable in this area. It has proven to be quite lucrative for many of today's investors. In fact, I believe some of them even frequent this message board.
We will see how well your lucrative nonsense works when the algoryithmic programers are on the wrong side of the trade. I believe you will be very surprised at the results. There is no system in a bad market.
Mount batten wrote:
seattle prattle wrote:
Perhaps you could benefit from seeking the help of a respected investment advisor knowledgable in this area. It has proven to be quite lucrative for many of today's investors. In fact, I believe some of them even frequent this message board.
We will see how well your lucrative nonsense works when the algoryithmic programers are on the wrong side of the trade. I believe you will be very surprised at the results. There is no system in a bad market.
Algorithms > humans
Common sense > algorithms
Investment algorithms outperform human managers by a substantial amount. This is beyond debate.
Mount batten wrote:
More importantly where will it be March 2019.
I'm sure your hope is DOWN. Just as you hoped in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018. And again, ain't gonna happen.
Note iced wrote:
Igy is gone but alive.
He’s dead to me.
mellon wrote:
Mount batten wrote:
More importantly where will it be March 2019.
I'm sure your hope is DOWN. Just as you hoped in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018. And again, ain't gonna happen.
.....but the value of your investment will go back to 1998.....too bad.....
Stanley Morgan wrote:
Note iced wrote:
Igy is gone but alive.
He’s dead to me.
Go fats.....
Mount Batten wrote:
mellon wrote:
I'm sure your hope is DOWN. Just as you hoped in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018. And again, ain't gonna happen.
.....but the value of your investment will go back to 1998.....too bad.....
No it won't.
It's called "taking your profits." See, if you have what's called "unrealized gains", you simply need to sell and they become "realized gains."
Perhaps that reputable investment advisor could tutor you in these matters.
Another splendid day in the markets, btw.
seattle prattle wrote:
Mount Batten wrote:
.....but the value of your investment will go back to 1998.....too bad.....
No it won't.
It's called "taking your profits." See, if you have what's called "unrealized gains", you simply need to sell and they become "realized gains."
Perhaps that reputable investment advisor could tutor you in these matters.
Another splendid day in the markets, btw.
Yes it will.
You can’t avoid the fact that each share of stock must be owned by someone at each moment in time. So your logic is misguided.
Perhaps you need a factually informed investment advisor and rather than a carnival barker stock hawker.
Mount batten wrote:
seattle prattle wrote:
No it won't.
It's called "taking your profits." See, if you have what's called "unrealized gains", you simply need to sell and they become "realized gains."
Perhaps that reputable investment advisor could tutor you in these matters.
Another splendid day in the markets, btw.
Yes it will.
You can’t avoid the fact that each share of stock must be owned by someone at each moment in time. So your logic is misguided.
Perhaps you need a factually informed investment advisor and rather than a carnival barker stock hawker.
Your logic eludes me. When an investor has amassed a substantial gain in a fairly liquid asset, surely there is time to sell after say, a 15% decline or even 20%. In hypothetical terms, lets imagine that the unrealized gains on said asset are 100%. Even selling after a 20% drop will yield an 80% capital gain.
All of which leads me to the conclusion that it is far better to be the investor that has ridden the market up over the last few years and has unrealized gains to take profit on, if they choose, than to be a would be investor who has missed out on that stock market appreciation in lieu of awaiting a precipitous drop that may or may not happen.
Yes, every stock must be owned by somebody, but it doesn't have to be owned by the person who chooses to sell it at a profit.
Simple response: tell me your percentage equity 1/26/2018 and 2/8/2018?
You are nothing special, you may think you are.
It was just about what it is now since i've only made small trades since then. And now in brokerage accounts it is 92% equities, 7.5% cash.
but correct that, given triple leveraged ETFs in my portfolio, i am actually 110% invested.
