Huge swings in New York City’s outer boroughs in Trumps favor The Bronx: +21 points for Trump Queens: +20 points for Trump Brooklyn: +11 points for Trump
Please don't run away when this is over, LOL. You are the biggest clown ever and the humiliation will be epic. It's clear you have no critical thinking skills and only see the 172 to 81 "lead" for Trump and are literally too stupid to understand that this is due to geography, .time zones and population centers. It has nothing to do with who is actually "winning."
Again, if I put 48 red coins in a bag and 52 blue coins in a bag, how the coins are pulled out of the bag has absolutely nothing to do with the actual result at the end and no one is "winning" over the other because smart people who understand numbers will know that there are still other coins in the bag that have to be counted.
Kamala will win, just like Biden won and you will cry and say it was rigged, because you are too stupid to understand math.
Go to sleep, when you wake up you will face the realization that there will be a Madam President.
Take it up with the New York Times. I'm sure they're a complete MA6A paper.
The New York Times called it big for Hillary. You are a moron.
JUST IN: NEW YORK TIMES final estimates, 10:15PM ET WI: Trump+1.1 NV: Trump+1.8 MI: Trump+1.9 PA: Trump+1.9 GA: Trump+2.6 NC: Trump+3.2 AZ: Trump+3.9 Popular vote: Trump+0.6 Win odds: 79%
The NYT stupid thing is not a prediction tool, it's an information tool as it merely is showing you the progress to the 270 based on whatever states have been called for the candidate. The fact that you think it's predictive shows how easily manipulated and stupid you are.
The NYT stupid thing is not a prediction tool, it's an information tool as it merely is showing you the progress to the 270 based on whatever states have been called for the candidate. The fact that you think it's predictive shows how easily manipulated and stupid you are.
The NYT stupid thing is not a prediction tool, it's an information tool as it merely is showing you the progress to the 270 based on whatever states have been called for the candidate. The fact that you think it's predictive shows how easily manipulated and stupid you are.
Wrong. Enjoy a 2nd Trump term!
Watch how it changes when CA, WA and Oregon are called for Harris.
The NYT stupid thing is not a prediction tool, it's an information tool as it merely is showing you the progress to the 270 based on whatever states have been called for the candidate. The fact that you think it's predictive shows how easily manipulated and stupid you are.
"Our election model estimates the outcome of the race in real time based on polling data, the votes reported so far and what we expect from remaining votes. "