For whatever it might be worth, Kamala is romping on the LRC "I voted for" thread.
Or, to put it a different way, Trump is getting killed.
The trumpers have been living so deep in their bubble and conned by fake polls and fake enthusiasm. They are not prepared for reality.
Exactly!
Remember the Gavin Newsom recall that they were convinced would be successful? I remember people on this site 100% convinced that he would be recalled and they were completely delusional because they live in their echo chamber bubbles, fueled by clueless idiots on X. Despite their assurances that the polls were correct, Newsom won 62% - 38%, which was a landslide! They don't realize that unlike them, progressives have jobs, lives, girlfriends, families and sh!t to do. They don't live on X and they don't respond to polls. They calmy vote when the times comes and keep it moving along with their lives.
An IQ of 75 may be too high. Maybe low 70s or high 60s?
In all seriousness: probably about 115. Which would be the lowest of all-time for Presidents. Biden, Trump, and Bush were probably in the 120s. Bill Clinton and Nixon had higher IQs, but John Quincy Adams had the highest IQ of any presidents - even though he wasn't that great of a politician.
Both her parents are professors. But, she didn't get into any tough schools or stand out academically, and she doesn't appear to have any intellectual interests. That's how I arrived at the 115 estimate (which several other experts agree with).
NEW: The election director for Fayette County, PA, filed a new case claiming a township election judge is planning to hand-count ballots in violation of state law, even after being told he cannot do that. Asking for an order compelling the official to comply, and if he won't, to direct the sheriff's office to go in and escort put a poll worker + election materials
The trumpers have been living so deep in their bubble and conned by fake polls and fake enthusiasm. They are not prepared for reality.
Exactly!
Remember the Gavin Newsom recall that they were convinced would be successful? I remember people on this site 100% convinced that he would be recalled and they were completely delusional because they live in their echo chamber bubbles, fueled by clueless idiots on X. Despite their assurances that the polls were correct, Newsom won 62% - 38%, which was a landslide! They don't realize that unlike them, progressives have jobs, lives, girlfriends, families and sh!t to do. They don't live on X and they don't respond to polls. They calmy vote when the times comes and keep it moving along with their lives.
Kamala - 90 million+ votes - 319
Trump - 70 million votes - 219
---------------------------------
Landslide!
So far off it's not even funny. Prepare for your loss!
"Donald Trump faced hundreds of empty seats during his final rally on Monday in Pennsylvania, the key battleground state that could decide the presidential race."
Again, I think there's no strong correlation, either way, between rally size and vote tallies.
Does anyone *not* think that Trump's voters were all locked in weeks/months ago? It's not like going to a rally now is likely to change that.
It's good that you and others on this board are learning from my insightful posts but you're misunderstanding what I said.
If Trump gets 50,000 people in rural PA -> this is huge because it means a lot of people traveled a distance to stand in a field/venue to hear him-> these people will be highly likely to travel to the polls to vote for Trump.
If Kamala gets 100,000 people in dense-urban Philadelphia -> this is negligible because fewer of these people had to make as much of an effort to get there and could possibly just be there because their friend group was going -> these people are not as likely to vote when they have to make an actual individual effort to get to the polls. For many, it was a social event.
Judith Painter, 77-year-old retired Republican, said she voted for Vice President Kamala Harris and Bob Casey for the state Senate. Her decision was based on abortion rights, and having lived in a time before Roe v. Wade, she said she “firmly believes that a woman has a right to choose.”
Remember the Gavin Newsom recall that they were convinced would be successful? I remember people on this site 100% convinced that he would be recalled and they were completely delusional because they live in their echo chamber bubbles, fueled by clueless idiots on X. Despite their assurances that the polls were correct, Newsom won 62% - 38%, which was a landslide! They don't realize that unlike them, progressives have jobs, lives, girlfriends, families and sh!t to do. They don't live on X and they don't respond to polls. They calmy vote when the times comes and keep it moving along with their lives.
Kamala - 90 million+ votes - 319
Trump - 70 million votes - 219
---------------------------------
Landslide!
So far off it's not even funny. Prepare for your loss!
Why would a grandmother care about her children, grandchildren or great grandchildren? To ma6a it is a mystery.
Not to mention, those 77 year old women were 27 when Roe was decided. They are the ones that fought for the right, they aren't going to sit idle while it's being taken away.
In addition to stupid, Trumpers have no sense of history.
Why would a grandmother care about her children, grandchildren or great grandchildren? To ma6a it is a mystery.
Not to mention, those 77 year old women were 27 when Roe was decided. They are the ones that fought for the right, they aren't going to sit idle while it's being taken away.
In addition to stupid, Trumpers have no sense of history.
She wrecked a home to get a job, tried to make believe she’s a black woman and couldn’t get a vote in primaries so got forced onto Biden. then they force him out to force her in.
That is Communism.
If that is your understanding of communism then you have no place in a discussion on politics.
In fact, you have no place on any topic among adults.
Perhaps you should go play with Dee Dee. You can teach him everything you know about communism and he can teach you everything he knows about desalinization.
Why would a grandmother care about her children, grandchildren or great grandchildren? To ma6a it is a mystery.
Doubt she has grandchildren.
Here's what another woman, in the same article, who actually cited her offspring as a reason to vote, said. I strongly agree with the bolded part.
“I voted for Donald Trump because of the economy, the safety of our country, the influx of immigrants, and for my children’s future — and my hope-to-be grandchildren’s future,” Ms. Gielarowski said. “[I hope] it’s safer, no wars. I have all boys, so no wars.”
