Official LRC Kamala Harris for President Thread

You’re a lunatic, so this is an expected reaction. What’s with you not being shocked by the Hillary funded Steele Dossier Russia Hoax, or Joe Biden getting money from the mayor of Moscow? Or is it just a factor that you are dumb?

I have it 319 to 219 in favor of Harris, but even if Harris Lost Pennsylvania AND LOST Georgia, AND LOST Arizona, she still wins 273 to 265.

This map is WORST case scenario for Harris.
It's OVER!

270towin.com

270toWin - 2024 Presidential Election Interactive Map

Create your own forecast for the 2024 presidential election

Open link

I haven't read it yet but I don't care much about it. I may read it over Thanksgiving when I have time. If it's anything like the other cases - 34 felonies for bookkeeping, when he called payments to a lawyer legal fees - it's a complete sham

Biden and Harris both supported Antifa BLM Riots and other democrats supported it as well. I remain firm in my belief that if any Bidenettes/Harris followers reads it, they will denounce Harris for the liar that she is.

nationalpolice.org

Tell Congress to investigate the 2020 BLM/Antifa riots as they did January 6th

admin

In 2020, the United States was subjected to 574 violent riots which resulted in injuries to over 2000 police officers, looting of businesses, over 2...

Open link

Dem's don't understand crowd sizes... large crows in large population centers that are 90% democrat aren't all the impressive.

When Trump draws a huge crowd in rural/suburban area where people have to travel significant distance that is actually impressive.

People in DC or Philly can basically roll out of bed or walk out of the building they work in and they're there.

These things are not comparable and a huge crowd in Philly isn't that impressive.

Read The Opponent, Not The Polls
BY TYLER DURDEN
MONDAY, NOV 04, 2024 - 09:45 PM
Authored by Thaddeus McCotter via American Greatness,
For recovering politicians, this is the most dangerous time for a relapse, especially those living in a swing state. Their televisions, radios, and social media are chock with political news and ads. This can spark a recrudescence of old vices, such as arguing at the top of one’s lungs at an offending ad or slanted news story, and, worse, then conjuring a way to counter it and win the election for their side. It may even spur them to contact old friends still in the political arena and urge them to incorporate their “unexpectedly” inspired idea into their campaign. Such a loss of realistic expectations and understanding of what others are going through constitutes sure signs the poor creature is reverting to a politician’s solipsistic mindset.
Further exacerbating the risk of their relapsing, interested friends from across the country send recovering politicians’ links to ads, news, or tweets to get their reaction. This can further trigger bouts of the ex-pol shouting to the heavens—or elsewhere—and reengaging the sordid political world they had renounced.
Yet, by far the most frequent temptation occurs when friends from across the country contact the recovering politician to see if he or she has any insight into how their swing state and/or the nation will ultimately choose for president (and often who will control both chambers of Congress). These contacts are usually precipitated by the inquirer seeing a poll and asking if the recovering politician believes it is “accurate.” Tragically, the recovering politician may immediately commence addressing the merits of the poll’s methodology; the voting history of various constituencies vis-à-vis the poll results; and sundry other micro- and macro-critiques and speculations regarding the election—including their view of “what they need to do to win!”
When the relapsed pol hits rock bottom, it “ain’t that pretty at all….”
Of course, the friends of an ex-pol do not want to be the reason he or she goes cannonballing back into the political cesspool. So, for their sake and that of my fellow recovering politicians, I offer this bit of advice to avoid the temptation to relapse posed by “the polls say” query: Watch the opponent, not the polls.
The virtue of this approach is to allow the inquirer to refrain from dragging the recovering politician back into the electoral fray for a simple reason: the inquirer can figure it out on their own. Granted, it isn’t foolproof, since fools will be too benighted to interpret an opponent’s political machinations.Still, it can help reduce the number of “the polls say” questions and, ergo, the near occasion of temptation for the ex-pol to reengage.
Presently, the Democrat nominee’s presidential bid exemplifies why understanding what a campaign is doing is the best barometer of how a candidate is performing with the electorate—not a poll.
On the micro-level, one can view the Harris campaign’s targeting of individual constituencies, which have traditionally comprised integral parts of the Democrat coalition. From young African-American men to Hispanics to Arab-Americans to Jewish-Americans, the Harris campaign’s assumed, almost unanimous, and necessary support has been lacking. As a result, we see not only an increase in her campaign’s messaging to these constituencies, we see the surreal hectoring of young black males—and males, in general—by surrogates, such as the Obamas. Asking voters to support your candidate indicates your campaign is okay; urging voters to support your candidate indicates your campaign is troubled; criticizing voters as not being “man” enough to vote for your candidate indicates your campaign is cooked. Other targeted messages abound within the Harris campaigns, including the emphasis on increased federal spending within the African-American community (in one of the most patronizingly racist appeals imaginable); abortion (though it is hard to imagine those who believe abortion is the overriding issue not already voting for the vice president); and the big lie about “Project 2025” being Donald Trump’s post-election agenda—all of which are designed to unite and rally a presently eroding and unenthusiastic Democrat voter base.
On the macro-level, be one a political junkie or a well-adjusted person, the Harris campaign’s desperation is patent for all to see, notably by those Democrat candidates’ running from the radical leftist Ms. Harris and racing toward the middle:
August’s “politics of joy” has devolved into October’s “Trump is Hitler.”
Now, do you really need to risk a recovering politician’s relapse to recognize the Harris campaign is circling the drain?

zerohedge.com

Read The Opponent, Not The Polls

Be one a political junkie or a well-adjusted person, the Harris campaign’s desperation is patent for all to see...

Open link

Oh, it's over all right. But that's because Trump will win tomorrow. MA6A

Harris busses them in, proven numerous times.

Everything Trump Touches Dies

Before trump we never had to protect poll workers with firearms, razor wire, bomb sweeps and drones.

AZ:

Razor wire. Thick black iron fencing. Metal detectors. Armed security guards. Bomb sweeps.
The security at this centre where workers count ballots mirrors what you might see at an airport - or even a prison. And, if needed, plans are in place to further bolster security to include drones, officers on horseback and police snipers on rooftops.

Maricopa County became the centre of election conspiracy theories during the 2020 presidential contest, after Donald Trump spread unfounded claims of voter fraud when he lost the state to Joe Biden by fewer than 11,000 votes.

Falsehoods went viral, armed protesters flooded the building where ballots were being tallied and a flurry of lawsuits and audits aimed to challenge the results.

https://x.com/JackPosobiec/status/1853620170356347200?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

I don't support violence at all but it's good to have security. Election integrity is incredibly important and it'll ensure that people truly trust in the integrity of the elections.

LOL, it's OVER for Kamala. You clearly have zero knowledge of swing states versus sure things. Dumbest post on the thread, congrats.

Good assessment of Trump's character by this New York columnist

From Sydney Morning Herald

smh.com.au

I asked Trump a question about violence. His answer was honest, and chilling

Maureen Dowd

How did America become a place where a man with no character has an even chance of being re-elected president?

Open link

His supporters should really read it and see what ride they are being taken for.

Look at the map I posted and point to 1 state that you think Trump will win and do so with a straight face.

Can you please let us know what part of the federal legal indictment is "total nonsense". Maybe some specific paragraphs would clarify your statement.

Also, please tell us what part of this statement is not true:

Trump took hundreds of classified documents to his FL home/resort. He stored them in unsecured areas. The government asked for the documents many times over nearly a year. He and his lawyers lied about what they had. Finally the FBI came and got the documents.

No, the Indictment isn’t total nonsense. And the title of whatever you posted is worthy of discussion. And if you weren’t such a miserable maggot, I’d probably even engage and agree with you. But you are a miserable maggot and the only truly awful human being I’ve ever encountered here. You don’t ever want to me meet, brother. And trust me, brother, the rest of your sad life will be the same as it is now.

Utter Nonsense.