Clever Nihilist wrote:
Questionable1 wrote:
I'm saying you are wrong.
I'm saying that and saying you are a racist and a male chauvinist.
I'm saying you are a piece of s***
If the facts make me that, so be it lol.
For the record, I try to hire females and minorities whenever I can, even if their resume’s aren’t quite as impressive as white male candidates because I believe representation matters. Also, it helps protect my job security when my administration could not care less how competitive we are (like most admins), our athletes care more about a “positive student-athlete experience” than actually competing (we just keep’em happy), and they’re often better “team players” instead of always thinking they know better and stabbing me in the back. Usually because they don’t understand how little our support staff and athletes actually care/how it actually works versus how they wished it worked. Please don’t misunderstand this as me saying females and minorities are worse/less deserving coaches. Obviously they are not. Love seeing them being given opportunities.
Let me preference this by saying thanks for trying.
Now why do you paint the picture of being forced to hire females or minorities as some sort of “PC culture” if you truly believe representation matters?
And I ask because coaches wear many hats. Some fit snuggly and some are pretty loose. Regardless, as the head of a program, I assume you try to adjust everyone’s many hats to fit better. You follow me? As such, would it not be creating a competitive environment for you to help a female or minority grow as a coach in a particular area as they help you grow as a person and leader through diversity? You have many different fitting hats also!