get the fugg outta here
get the fugg outta here
I swear 50% of this thread is just white dudes with egos crying
Serious question. Let’s say you had a small conference D1 head coach offer AND a P5 (albeit bottom tier P5) offer to be an assistant coach. Pay about the same. Which would you take and why?
Throws Jobs Updates:
LSU: Clayton
KSU: Watson
UN: St Clare
ISU: Omara
UNLV: Scott
FU: Werskey
UI: Robinson
NDSU: Pflaumbaum
Duke: Angelo
Army: Hershberger
Purdue: Page
Florida State?
Michigan?
Charlotte?
UPenn?
Idaho?
Michigan State?
UNI?
Grand Canyon?
Tiffin?
Slippery rock?
Milwaukee?
Saginaw?
Iowa central?
New Orleans?
Montana ?
Not really. By the change in Henry's bio, Michigan will move forward with him (at least until he retires). They'll replace Clayton and need to find a serious recruiter to return relevant.
TrackFan55 wrote:
I swear 50% of this thread is just white dudes with egos crying
Columbia just hired a sprints/jumps coach whose crowning accomplishment (according to the hiring announcement) was an athlete winning a conference title in the 800. Their criticisms are 100% valid.
thoughtsfailure wrote:
TrackFan55 wrote:
I swear 50% of this thread is just white dudes with egos crying
Columbia just hired a sprints/jumps coach whose crowning accomplishment (according to the hiring announcement) was an athlete winning a conference title in the 800. Their criticisms are 100% valid.
To be the 2nd sprints assistant (not the lead sprints coach) at a school that will never be relevant in her event group for likely around $50k to live in one of the most expensive places on earth - largely meant to signal to the black kids on the team that #blacklivesmatter. Call me a racist, call me a cynic, call me an a$$hole, but you can’t say I’m wrong.
How competitive do you think this job was to get? You really wanted that job? For that matter, how many of the “female” or “minority” jobs that you all complain about were really that appealing? They’re often low-paying entry-level jobs that involve a lot more operations and recruiting than actual coaching. Sure they may be at big name schools, but these women often get stuck at that level without the network that more “established” coaches have. At least they’re getting the experience & paying the dues that so many of you claim they should have already?
All Mine wrote:
Idaho sprints/hurdles
https://uidaho.peopleadmin.com/postings/32527Idaho throws
https://uidaho.peopleadmin.com/postings/32526
Idaho sprints was open last year as well
Covid blew up the hire I assume
Carson Newman filled
Kentucky Wesleyan Head Coaching vacancy. What's up? First round interviews happened like 2 weeks ago!
Throws Jobs Updates:
LSU: Clayton
KSU: Watson
UN: St Clare
ISU: Omara
UNLV: Scott
FU: Werskey
UI: Robinson
NDSU: Pflaumbaum
Duke: Angelo
Army: Hershberger
Purdue: Page
UPenn: Tholis
Michigan State: James
UNI: Foote
Florida State: Ott
Michigan: Cartwright
Charlotte?
Idaho?
Grand Canyon?
Tiffin?
Slippery rock?
Milwaukee?
Saginaw?
Iowa central?
New Orleans?
Montana ?
SLU?
UTRGV?
Texas State?
BU?
That’s, just like, your opinion, man
Clever Nihilist wrote:
thoughtsfailure wrote:
Columbia just hired a sprints/jumps coach whose crowning accomplishment (according to the hiring announcement) was an athlete winning a conference title in the 800. Their criticisms are 100% valid.
To be the 2nd sprints assistant (not the lead sprints coach) at a school that will never be relevant in her event group for likely around $50k to live in one of the most expensive places on earth - largely meant to signal to the black kids on the team that #blacklivesmatter. Call me a racist, call me a cynic, call me an a$$hole, but you can’t say I’m wrong.
How competitive do you think this job was to get? You really wanted that job? For that matter, how many of the “female” or “minority” jobs that you all complain about were really that appealing? They’re often low-paying entry-level jobs that involve a lot more operations and recruiting than actual coaching. Sure they may be at big name schools, but these women often get stuck at that level without the network that more “established” coaches have. At least they’re getting the experience & paying the dues that so many of you claim they should have already?
I'm saying you are wrong.
I'm saying that and saying you are a racist and a male chauvinist.
I'm saying you are a piece of s***
Questionable1 wrote:
Clever Nihilist wrote:
To be the 2nd sprints assistant (not the lead sprints coach) at a school that will never be relevant in her event group for likely around $50k to live in one of the most expensive places on earth - largely meant to signal to the black kids on the team that #blacklivesmatter. Call me a racist, call me a cynic, call me an a$$hole, but you can’t say I’m wrong.
How competitive do you think this job was to get? You really wanted that job? For that matter, how many of the “female” or “minority” jobs that you all complain about were really that appealing? They’re often low-paying entry-level jobs that involve a lot more operations and recruiting than actual coaching. Sure they may be at big name schools, but these women often get stuck at that level without the network that more “established” coaches have. At least they’re getting the experience & paying the dues that so many of you claim they should have already?
I'm saying you are wrong.
I'm saying that and saying you are a racist and a male chauvinist.
I'm saying you are a piece of s***
If the facts make me that, so be it lol.
For the record, I try to hire females and minorities whenever I can, even if their resume’s aren’t quite as impressive as white male candidates because I believe representation matters. Also, it helps protect my job security when my administration could not care less how competitive we are (like most admins), our athletes care more about a “positive student-athlete experience” than actually competing (we just keep’em happy), and they’re often better “team players” instead of always thinking they know better and stabbing me in the back. Usually because they don’t understand how little our support staff and athletes actually care/how it actually works versus how they wished it worked. Please don’t misunderstand this as me saying females and minorities are worse/less deserving coaches. Obviously they are not. Love seeing them being given opportunities.
KY Wesleyan…Are they looking for college coaching experience?
Anyone know?
thoughtsfailure wrote:
TrackFan55 wrote:
I swear 50% of this thread is just white dudes with egos crying
Columbia just hired a sprints/jumps coach whose crowning accomplishment (according to the hiring announcement) was an athlete winning a conference title in the 800. Their criticisms are 100% valid.
To be honest, all I read was wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah wah. Welcome to the real world buddy. Sometimes (most of the time) it’s who you know rather than what you know
Quagmires Quandry wrote:
https://goutrgv.com/news/2021/7/20/utrgv-athletics-hires-shareese-hicks-as-new-track-field-and-cross-country-head-coach.aspxNo comment
Thanks Charming…none was needed…the white male tears are still evident!