Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Flagpole wrote:

The Fokus wrote:

Pence would be worse than Trump because, as you said, he might actually get some things done because the emotions won't be as strong. Traveling to Indiana for periods of time for the last 5 or 6 years explains him winning the Governorship.

Pence is horrible, but you understate the horribleness that is Donald Trump if you think Pence would be worse. So far we don't have any evidence that Pence is involved in all this Russia stuff. Trump's involvement with Russia and minimizing the evil of Putin is WAY worse than anything Pence could do. Pence could not lie as often as Trump if he tried, and Pence doesn't have the charisma that Trump does, so he would not have throngs of crazy people poised to follow him.

Trump is the worst ever...BY FAR. Pence is a mosquito in comparison.

Pence was strategically placed by the GOP for VP nomination. He is their best right-wing agenda pusher but his only chance of being President was always going to be by way of Trump impeachment or resignation. He clearly doesnt have what it takes to win a presidential race.

There are a couple of disturbing issues with Pence though which might make him pretty dangerous: 1. He thinks he’s on a religious mission and curently that mission is to support Trump unconditionally. He has said this himself. 2. He believes the earth is a few thousand years old and thus we would have somehow overlapped with dinasours. If 1 is just a strategy to stroke Trump’s ego then fine, but 2 is a sign of just plain stupidity.

OLD SMTC SOB wrote:

For all you Mueller rumpswabs out there. He does not appear to be the knight in shining armor that the darling media or flagpole would have you believe.

https://howiecarrshow.com/2018/03/22/2322/

Mueller is a war hero. He's a man who has served his country with honor and dignity his whole life. He is revered by leaders of both parties.

But since they can't come up with dirt against him, the right is going through all his old cases to find anything questionable. And since all cases hinge on the subject of right and wrong, you can always go back and re-litigate in the press. This just shows how little they've been able to find on Mueller. He's tough to attack.

Trollminator wrote:

Pence was strategically placed by the GOP for VP nomination.

“I’m concerned he’d be a president that the Kochs would own.” --- Steve Bannon

Monkeys typing wrote:

Trollminator wrote:

Pence was strategically placed by the GOP for VP nomination.

“I’m concerned he’d be a president that the Kochs would own.” --- Steve Bannon

No longer too much of a worry. They own Trump (see tax reform).

Fat hurts wrote:

OLD SMTC SOB wrote:

For all you Mueller rumpswabs out there. He does not appear to be the knight in shining armor that the darling media or flagpole would have you believe.

https://howiecarrshow.com/2018/03/22/2322/

Mueller is a war hero. He's a man who has served his country with honor and dignity his whole life. He is revered by leaders of both parties.

But since they can't come up with dirt against him, the right is going through all his old cases to find anything questionable. And since all cases hinge on the subject of right and wrong, you can always go back and re-litigate in the press. This just shows how little they've been able to find on Mueller. He's tough to attack.

OLD SMTC had me at howiecarrshow.com

Anyone remember this tweet?

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/948195478428102657

Not that I am happy about airline fatalities, but it shows that the president has virtually zero control over this sort of thing.

Remember, everything Trump claims should be reversed to reflect the truth.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/986547093610299392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

This tweet means that Trump knows exactly who threatened Stormy Daniels.

Fat hurts wrote:

OLD SMTC SOB wrote:

For all you Mueller rumpswabs out there. He does not appear to be the knight in shining armor that the darling media or flagpole would have you believe.

https://howiecarrshow.com/2018/03/22/2322/

Mueller is a war hero. He's a man who has served his country with honor and dignity his whole life. He is revered by leaders of both parties.

But since they can't come up with dirt against him, the right is going through all his old cases to find anything questionable. And since all cases hinge on the subject of right and wrong, you can always go back and re-litigate in the press. This just shows how little they've been able to find on Mueller. He's tough to attack.

Irrespective of his military service, if in fact he did sign off on keeping 4 innocent men in prison, would you not want to know about that? And the Boston Globe, being the liberal bastion of the left leaning media in MA, seems to agree.

When Comes got fired: Trump told NBC’s Lester Holt shortly after Comey was fired that the Russia investigation was central to his decision. Rosenstein “made a recommendation,” Trump said, “but regardless of recommendation I was going to fire Comey, knowing there was no good time to do it. ... this Russia thing with Trump and Russia is a made-up story.”

Today's Tweet from Trump: Slippery James Comey, the worst FBI Director in history, was not fired because of the phony Russia investigation.

OLD SMTC SOB wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Mueller is a war hero. He's a man who has served his country with honor and dignity his whole life. He is revered by leaders of both parties.

But since they can't come up with dirt against him, the right is going through all his old cases to find anything questionable. And since all cases hinge on the subject of right and wrong, you can always go back and re-litigate in the press. This just shows how little they've been able to find on Mueller. He's tough to attack.

Irrespective of his military service, if in fact he did sign off on keeping 4 innocent men in prison, would you not want to know about that? And the Boston Globe, being the liberal bastion of the left leaning media in MA, seems to agree.

Also, something like this it would seem to me, is quite a bit more than "questionable".

OLD SMTC SOB wrote:

Irrespective of his military service, if in fact he did sign off on keeping 4 innocent men in prison, would you not want to know about that? And the Boston Globe, being the liberal bastion of the left leaning media in MA, seems to agree.

I would not only want to know about it, I'd want the prisoners to file motions for retrial and for the whole thing to be investigated by the Justice Department.

But I'm guessing that none of those things have happened because there isn't enough evidence. And if there isn't enough evidence to even file a motion, the Boston Globe probably got it wrong.

Of course, I haven't read your article because of its dubious origin. So just keep me posted if anything happens in the real world that we need to know about.

No wonder McConnell refuses to allow a vote on protecting Mueller from being fired by Trump. He knows it would pass, and McConnell's Russian donors would be bigly angry.

During the 2015-2016 election season, Ukrainian-born billionaire Leonard "Len" Blavatnik contributed $6.35 million to leading Republican candidates and incumbent senators. Mitch McConnell was the top recipient of Blavatnik's donations, collecting $2.5 million.

https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2018/04/05/putins-proxies-helped-funnel-millions-gop-campaigns

Fat hurts wrote:

I would not only want to know about it, I'd want the prisoners to file motions for retrial and for the whole thing to be investigated by the Justice Department.

But I'm guessing that none of those things have happened because there isn't enough evidence. And if there isn't enough evidence to even file a motion, the Boston Globe probably got it wrong.

It's click-bait with only the thinnest attachment to any kind of basis in fact designed to build public opposition to Mueller to get Congress out of the way so Trump can shut down the investigation.

Once again, if this is such a non-story, Mueller's investigation will show exactly that. Gee, I wonder why Trump spends so much energy trying to stop an investigation if he is innocent?

Fat hurts wrote:

OLD SMTC SOB wrote:

Irrespective of his military service, if in fact he did sign off on keeping 4 innocent men in prison, would you not want to know about that? And the Boston Globe, being the liberal bastion of the left leaning media in MA, seems to agree.

I would not only want to know about it, I'd want the prisoners to file motions for retrial and for the whole thing to be investigated by the Justice Department.

But I'm guessing that none of those things have happened because there isn't enough evidence. And if there isn't enough evidence to even file a motion, the Boston Globe probably got it wrong.

Of course, I haven't read your article because of its dubious origin. So just keep me posted if anything happens in the real world that we need to know about.

Well of course we all know that the Globe, being a liberal bastion in the media world, must have got it wrong. I mean, they run all kinds of articles on Trump that have turned out to be fake, they must, of course do the same when reporting about things on the left. Also consider that the Boston FBI office was shown to be the most corrupt in the country, and its of no surprise to me that anyone associated with it caries a "taint". I was pretty much indifferent to Mueller, till now. I'll be very interested to see the fallout.

Count Chocula wrote:

Anyone remember this tweet?

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/948195478428102657

Not that I am happy about airline fatalities, but it shows that the president has virtually zero control over this sort of thing.

YOU ARE A SICK INDIVIDUAL COUNT IDIOT!!!!!!! That lady died and you're gloating about trying to prove a President's tweet was wrong?

Everyone knew he had zero control over something like that, we didn't need a fatality to show us? Damn you're a mental sick person to post that.

OLD SMTC SOB wrote:

Irrespective of his military service, if in fact he did sign off on keeping 4 innocent men in prison, would you not want to know about that? And the Boston Globe, being the liberal bastion of the left leaning media in MA, seems to agree.

Sure, but the case presented by your source is pretty thin on evidence for conspiracy. The argument seems to be that Mueller as US Attorney argued against parole in 1986-7 while completely ignoring exculpatory evidence that probably wasn't available until to him until about 15 years later.

Also,

Update from The Upside Down: An English Professor who works at Fresno State tweeted something mean about Barbara Bush from her private account. Judging from the scarf she is wearing her profile picture, it is possible that she has sympathy for Palestinians. The fine people who run Breitbart think this is news that deserves to lead the headlines. "Demented" doesn't even begin to describe this...

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

I would not only want to know about it, I'd want the prisoners to file motions for retrial and for the whole thing to be investigated by the Justice Department.

But I'm guessing that none of those things have happened because there isn't enough evidence. And if there isn't enough evidence to even file a motion, the Boston Globe probably got it wrong.

It's click-bait with only the thinnest attachment to any kind of basis in fact designed to build public opposition to Mueller to get Congress out of the way so Trump can shut down the investigation.

Once again, if this is such a non-story, Mueller's investigation will show exactly that. Gee, I wonder why Trump spends so much energy trying to stop an investigation if he is innocent?

The author of the article lived the situation in Boston, and actually had a contract hit put out on him by Whitey Bulger et al. All while Whitey was working as an informant for the FBI, while the FBI covered for him. The only reason he didn't get whacked was because the hit man didn't want to kill him in front of his young daughter. As noted in the article, 4 men went to prison for a murder they did not commit, were kept in there even when the FBI knew they were innocent, Mueller included. They eventually were released and received huge payouts.

I thought it was strange that Hannity's name would be released as a Cohen client, and it turns out that the judge violated the normal procedure for keeping that information sealed until the client had a chance to make the case for why their name should not be revealed.

Well in this case the judge was going to keep Hannity's name under seal, but then CNN's lawyer Robert Balin argued on behalf of the press that it should be revealed, and the judge decided to do it. Well SHAZAYAM! How about that? Nothing partisan or corrupt about this process huh.

Will this CNN lawyer Balin have his office raided? What? You're asking why we would raid his office? Simple, to find out if he's committed any crimes! That's how investigations work I'm told because we can't find crimes without investigations ... duh! We have no charges, so we better raid him right now, take all his crap, and reveal all his clients and make them answer for all their legal dealings they had with Balin.

That's how our country works now, so let's get to it.

https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2018/04/17/report-attorney-for-cnn-and-nytimes-convinced-judge-to-publicly-name-sean-hannity/?dg