Yeah because clearly every single one of the 77 million people who voted Republican in 2024 is personally guilty of all those crimes. I must’ve missed the part in the platform about mandatory tax fraud and the 'official insurrection signup sheet.' Good thing we have sweeping generalizations to sort it all out for us.
Ummm . . . you voted for it.
Are you really too dumb to understand the difference between voting for, (and therefore supporting), something and being "personally guilty of all those crimes"?
I believe that the rule is that if you've ONLY been seeing it for ~10 years, you're still OFF the hook for voting for and enabling it. Not sure what the liability threshold is? Maybe TWENTY years ???
This is Agip essentially doing the same thing as the mo-ran Trumpers, i.e., concluding (or in the case of the Trumpers, pretending) that anti-Trumpers on this board must be liberals. Dumb as f***.
Agip should know that it's not true. But frankly (and as I've said before), I think that Agip (and some others) would rather preach to the Trumpers and engage in at least occasional (idiotic) exchanges with them (I'm guilty, too), than actually DISCUSS issues with the normies. On average, the moran Trumpers with half a dozen handles get more responses to their crap than normal anti-Trumpers do making honest/accurate observations, asking questions, etc.
Is that whiny? Yeah, I guess, maybe. But it is sometimes a little disappointing. Call me a p****!
We won't call you a "p%ssy." We will call you a lumberjack of a man. Strong and tough.
I've always wondered why Pelosi denied security J6 and a lot of capital officers were on PTO. But this is just conspiracy, right? LMAO. I've read Trump's entire speech. Not one sentence was offensive or aggressive. He said to march in Peace. In fact, MLK's speeches were horrendously more aggressive.
Are you really too dumb to understand the difference between voting for, (and therefore supporting), something and being "personally guilty of all those crimes"?
I believe that the rule is that if you've ONLY been seeing it for ~10 years, you're still OFF the hook for voting for and enabling it. Not sure what the liability threshold is? Maybe TWENTY years ???
YOu just reached Agip status - what have the Trump kids done? They are all good kids. You went waaaaaayyyy overboard on this.
Nonequals just went crazy on us.
You're never worth it, Sally, but what the hell:
1) You always tell us (lie to us) about how bad you think Trump is. Harris was just worse. Right.
2) HOW MANY videos, audio clips, and transcripts could I produce that would show Don Jr. sounding EXACTLY like his POS father? And in doing so, ENABLING him to ruin the country as we know it?
This is Agip essentially doing the same thing as the mo-ran Trumpers, i.e., concluding (or in the case of the Trumpers, pretending) that anti-Trumpers on this board must be liberals. Dumb as f***.
Agip should know that it's not true. But frankly (and as I've said before), I think that Agip (and some others) would rather preach to the Trumpers and engage in at least occasional (idiotic) exchanges with them (I'm guilty, too), than actually DISCUSS issues with the normies. On average, the moran Trumpers with half a dozen handles get more responses to their crap than normal anti-Trumpers do making honest/accurate observations, asking questions, etc.
Is that whiny? Yeah, I guess, maybe. But it is sometimes a little disappointing. Call me a p****!
We won't call you a "p%ssy." We will call you a lumberjack of a man. Strong and tough.
Well, I don't go by a woman's name, wear neither makeup nor eyeliner, and don't spend hours every day strenuously defending to strangers a weak, pathetic man that I actually view as "Alpha," so....
REPORTER: You just announced a new nominee for US Surgeon General who never finished her residency, and is not a practicing physician. So can you explain why you picked her to be America's top doctor?
TRUMP: Because Bobby thought she was fantastic ... I don't know her
1) You always tell us (lie to us) about how bad you think Trump is. Harris was just worse. Right.
2) HOW MANY videos, audio clips, and transcripts could I produce that would show Don Jr. sounding EXACTLY like his POS father? And in doing so, ENABLING him to ruin the country as we know it?
1) You always tell us (lie to us) about how bad you think Trump is. Harris was just worse. Right.
2) HOW MANY videos, audio clips, and transcripts could I produce that would show Don Jr. sounding EXACTLY like his POS father? And in doing so, ENABLING him to ruin the country as we know it?
“Trump isn’t just a disaster—he’s the full seven-course tasting menu of American embarrassment. Imagine if a flat-earther subreddit moderator, a can of Cheez Whiz that expired during the Bush administration, and the ShamWow guy all fused into one sentient tub of orange goo with a golf addiction. That’s him: the living embodiment of what happens when you let a reality TV sideshow host mainline Fox News and then hand him the nuclear football.”
REPORTER: You just announced a new nominee for US Surgeon General who never finished her residency, and is not a practicing physician. So can you explain why you picked her to be America's top doctor?
TRUMP: Because Bobby thought she was fantastic ... I don't know her
“Trump isn’t just a disaster—he’s the full seven-course tasting menu of American embarrassment. Imagine if a flat-earther subreddit moderator, a can of Cheez Whiz that expired during the Bush administration, and the ShamWow guy all fused into one sentient tub of orange goo with a golf addiction. That’s him: the living embodiment of what happens when you let a reality TV sideshow host mainline Fox News and then hand him the nuclear football.”
.....and it would be touch-and-go if there was another election tomorrow.
This is Agip essentially doing the same thing as the mo-ran Trumpers, i.e., concluding (or in the case of the Trumpers, pretending) that anti-Trumpers on this board must be liberals. Dumb as f***.
Agip should know that it's not true. But frankly (and as I've said before), I think that Agip (and some others) would rather preach to the Trumpers and engage in at least occasional (idiotic) exchanges with them (I'm guilty, too), than actually DISCUSS issues with the normies. On average, the moran Trumpers with half a dozen handles get more responses to their crap than normal anti-Trumpers do making honest/accurate observations, asking questions, etc.
Is that whiny? Yeah, I guess, maybe. But it is sometimes a little disappointing. Call me a p****!
You ALWAYS side with the libs & the democrat party. I never seen you promote any conservative positions.
This post was edited 2 minutes after it was posted.
“Trump isn’t just a disaster—he’s the full seven-course tasting menu of American embarrassment. Imagine if a flat-earther subreddit moderator, a can of Cheez Whiz that expired during the Bush administration, and the ShamWow guy all fused into one sentient tub of orange goo with a golf addiction. That’s him: the living embodiment of what happens when you let a reality TV sideshow host mainline Fox News and then hand him the nuclear football.”
.....and it would be touch-and-go if there was another election tomorrow.
Beyond depressing.
For who? Weaklings who can't find a job? Minorities? Queers? Which type of weird lib are you? Tell us? Black trans gets you a lot of points with the democraps.
Sad and accurate piece explaining that we have already lost our democracy. Institutions cannot speak freely against the ruling party anymore without fear of retribution. Universities, law firms, news orgs, politicians, companies have all been cowed by the ruling party in America and will not speak or act freely against Trump anymore.
That's it, boys. It's gone. You absolute idiots killed it.
We can theoretically build it back, but it's going to take the utter defeat of trumpism at the ballot box. And I don't see that happening, with the right wing mediasphere so powerful.
America has crossed the line into competitive authoritarianism. The Trump administration’s weaponization of government agencies and flurry of punitive actions against critics has raised the cost of opposition for a wide range of Americans. The Trump administration has taken (or credibly threatened) punitive action against a strikingly large number of individuals and organizations that it considers its opponents. It has, for example, selectively deployed law enforcement agencies against critics. President Trump directed the Department of Justice to open investigations into Christopher Krebs (who as the head of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency publicly contradicted Mr. Trump’s false claims of election fraud in 2020) and Miles Taylor (who, when he was a Department of Homeland Security official, anonymously wrote an opinion piece criticizing the president in 2018). The administration has also opened a criminal investigation into Letitia James, the attorney general of New York, who filed a lawsuit against Mr. Trump in 2022.
The administration has targeted major law firms for retribution. It effectively prohibited the federal government from hiring Perkins Coie; Paul, Weiss; and other leading law firms it perceived as friendly to the Democratic Party. It also threatened to cancel their clients’ government contracts and suspended their employees’ security clearances, preventing them from working on many cases related to the government.
Donors to the Democratic Party and other progressive causes also face political retribution. In April, Mr. Trump directed the attorney general to investigate the fund-raising practices of ActBlue, the Democratic Party’s main donor platform, in an apparent effort to weaken his rivals’ fund-raising infrastructure. Major Democratic donors now fear retribution in the form of tax and other investigations. Some have hired additional legal counsel to prepare for tax audits, congressional investigations or lawsuits. Others have moved assets abroad.
Like many autocratic governments, the Trump administration has targeted the media. Mr. Trump has sued ABC News, CBS News, Meta, Simon & Schuster and The Des Moines Register. The lawsuits appear to have weak legal bases, but because media outlets like ABC and CBS are owned by conglomerates with other interests affected by federal government decisions, a prolonged legal battle against a sitting president could be costly.