Monkeys typing wrote:
Cohen's third client is Sean Hannity.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/16/trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-refuses-to-identify-clients-as-court-faceoff-looms.html
You are probably right. Friends engaged in similar mischief are likely to refer legal solutions to each other. Gary remains super butt hurt that it’s all coming out. My how much more ethical and morally superior Romney is than all these guys yet the base rejects him - tells you everything.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
Hannity quote: “Michael never represented me in any matter. I never retained him,” Hannity insisted. “But I occasionally have had brief discussions with him” on legal matters.
And then Cohen, purely out of the goodness of his heart, took out a third mortgage, funneled the proceeds through an off-shore shell company, and bought the silence of some gold digger, all without Hannity's knowledge . . .
Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come wrote:
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
Hannity quote: “Michael never represented me in any matter. I never retained him,” Hannity insisted. “But I occasionally have had brief discussions with him” on legal matters.
And then Cohen, purely out of the goodness of his heart, took out a third mortgage, funneled the proceeds through an off-shore shell company, and bought the silence of some gold digger, all without Hannity's knowledge . . .
Well, that is Trump's excuse. He knew nothing about any payoff.
Trumpian Excuse wrote:
Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come wrote:
And then Cohen, purely out of the goodness of his heart, took out a third mortgage, funneled the proceeds through an off-shore shell company, and bought the silence of some gold digger, all without Hannity's knowledge . . .
Well, that is Trump's excuse. He knew nothing about any payoff.
I should add that it is likely that Hannity and Trump can claim they did not know because Cohen used other people's money to make the payoffs. No cost to the clients. That is how this game seems to have been played.
Trumpian Excuse wrote:
Trumpian Excuse wrote:
Well, that is Trump's excuse. He knew nothing about any payoff.
I should add that it is likely that Hannity and Trump can claim they did not know because Cohen used other people's money to make the payoffs. No cost to the clients. That is how this game seems to have been played.
This is how it's really done:
https://www.dailywire.com/news/29485/money-laundering-scheme-hillary-dnc-laundered-84-ryan-saavedraWere any of Hillary's lawyers raided? No. Why not?
Flagpole wrote:
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
I'm not understanding how.
Hannity is a Baghdad Bob for the Dear Leader. All we know is the Dean of Klown Kollege's fix-it man is doing something for Hannity. If Hannity has a side-piece, then paying them off to go away isn't illegal.
It would hardly be the end of his career.
Yeah, not illegal, but his viewers are right-wing religious nuts. He is a married man. If he is paying off a woman he had sex with, this could end him. Just speculation at this point, but the truth will come out...maybe.
And what does Hannity's sex habits have to do with Trump? You are like a hyper-active kid who squeals with joy with ANY news update about Mueller/Cohen/Trump/Collusion/ etc.
Trump derangement syndrome is turning you into a zombie.
DiscoGary wrote:
Were any of Hillary's lawyers raided? No. Why not?
Because they are smarter than a doorstop.
Your move.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Were any of Hillary's lawyers raided? No. Why not?
Because they are smarter than a doorstop.
Your move.
Those must be the lawyers who advised her on her unsecured server which contained secret material. Those genius lawyers right?
DiscoGary wrote:
Were any of Hillary's lawyers raided? No. Why not?
Whenever the news is too bad for Trump, you can always count on Gary to yell, "Hillary!!!!".
DiscoGary wrote:
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
Because they are smarter than a doorstop.
Your move.
Those must be the lawyers who advised her on her unsecured server which contained secret material. Those genius lawyers right?
Unlike Trump's attorneys who advised him to illegally destroyed documents demanded by court orders. And that is why Cohen's documents were raided—likely destruction.
http://www.newsweek.com/2016/11/11/donald-trump-companies-destroyed-emails-documents-515120.htmlDiscoGary wrote:
Were any of Hillary's lawyers raided? No. Why not?
Because this is fake news, got no real meat. First when asked to explain why the full force of the GOP plus millions of taxpayer dollars could not find anything on her, you said the democrats were protected by the Deep State. Then when asked why Trump's own appointees would assist in the investigation if there is nothing there, you claim both parties are part of the Deep State. Here's my counter argument, Trump's tentacles are so long and spread out across the current government that it's more plausible he's protected by the Deep State given all the shadiness surrounding him. Ever ask yourself why he hasn't been caught yet? Bet you didn't think of that angle did you?
Of course I am mocking you with the above. Take another look at your source. Yawn, please come back with something more credible.
Attorney Criminals wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Those must be the lawyers who advised her on her unsecured server which contained secret material. Those genius lawyers right?
Unlike Trump's attorneys who advised him to illegally destroyed documents demanded by court orders. And that is why Cohen's documents were raided—likely destruction.
http://www.newsweek.com/2016/11/11/donald-trump-companies-destroyed-emails-documents-515120.html
Gary is ok with intentional destruction of evidence
DiscoGary wrote:
Were any of Hillary's lawyers raided? No. Why not?
It may work differently in your country, but in the United States we don't send in the FSB before the ink dries on a complaint filed by one partisan group against another partisan group. Not yet anyway.
Trollminator wrote:
Attorney Criminals wrote:
Unlike Trump's attorneys who advised him to illegally destroyed documents demanded by court orders. And that is why Cohen's documents were raided—likely destruction.
http://www.newsweek.com/2016/11/11/donald-trump-companies-destroyed-emails-documents-515120.htmlGary is ok with intentional destruction of evidence
What happened to those 30,000 emails that Russia couldn't find? Oh, that's right. Hillary was given the opportunity to cleanse her server before it was turned over. Gee. Some folks get all the breaks!
Monkeys typing wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
Were any of Hillary's lawyers raided? No. Why not?
It may work differently in your country, but in the United States we don't send in the FSB before the ink dries on a complaint filed by one partisan group against another partisan group. Not yet anyway.
I guess the Clinton Dossier isn't strictly speaking a "complaint", but yes, the US definitely takes high level immediate action if one party submits partisan lies to the FBI.
DiscoGary wrote:
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
Because they are smarter than a doorstop.
Your move.
Those must be the lawyers who advised her on her unsecured server which contained secret material. Those genius lawyers right?
Did anyone go to jail? No.
Any kind of effort to prosecute for *something* ? No.
Besides, that was so long ago it doesn't matter. Right? Like Flynn's felony charges don't matter. Ages ago!
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
The woman is biased. Kimba Wood is a liberal democrat judge and a Clintonite. She should recuse herself from this case. I never said she is unqualified to be a judge,; however, she was a failed candidate for AG back in the day.
LOL ... Ms Wood just allowed copies of the seized documents to be seen by Cohen's legal team.
What's happening in the swamp? Trump being paid to play! I thought "the swamp" was draining???? What happened here?
https://www.opensecrets.org/trump/trump-properties
Can't a guy profit from being President? Sure. But, do it like the others and WAIT until you are out of office.