Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

The Fokus wrote:

Jive with wrote:

What I think the poster meant was that the meeting in Prague was in late September, and the peak Trump Secret server activity with a Russian bank was also in late September. McClatchydc.com states there was a discussion about money to pay for hacking. Those jive pretty well.

McClatchydc.com thinks a physical meeting occurred. But with today's tech that really isn't necessary, especially if you are going out of your way to hide it.

I get that it could have been a non face to face meeting however that is not at all what the story states. The story states Cohen was in Prague and Mueller has evidence of that. So he was either there or the story is wrong and means nothing.

You are entirely discounting the Mueller's evidence is a virtual meeting handled via a Trump Tower secret server linking through Alpha Bank. Cohen did not "have to be there." Why are you claiming there has to be a "real" meeting or it is a nothingburger? You are wrong to keep driving at that conclusion.

Cohen is essentially a moron.

http://www.msnbc.com/am-joy/watch/trump-lawyer-michael-cohen-under-criminal-investigation-1211043907580

this is it wrote:

Cohen is essentially a moron.

Cohen is not even a real lawyer. He is like Gloria Allred who has never tried a case in court. ̱He is nothing but a fixer. Trump cannot save him from any State crimes Cohen might be convicted of.

this is it wrote:

Cohen is essentially a moron.

This^.

I've read that he actually logged on to hotel wi-fi on his European adventures. Oops. Good sources believe that the McClatchy article is spot on and based on two sources, not one. I've also read some reports that the meeting might not have been Prague, but it did happen. Steele's dossier, I believe, is uncertain about the meeting location, but Prague was mentioned.

Remember, it's been reported that Cohen has been under criminal investigation for MONTHS. He's f*cked. And so is Trump.

Good evening! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine pm?

E Europeans were the ones who cooperated with Germany to send the Jews to the GAS CHAMBERS. Trump is E European and hates Jews like Michael Cohen. Trump is going to let the FBI fry Cohen in the oven.

Jive with wrote:

You are entirely discounting the Mueller's evidence is a virtual meeting handled via a Trump Tower secret server linking through Alpha Bank.

I know you were just responding to the Trumpbot, but I'm a bit behind on this story.

There is evidence of a "virtual meeting?"

A server communicating with some other server in Russia is not the same thing as a virtual meeting. I have bots trying exploits most hours of most days. I've heard this kind of traffic used to alarm and misdirect all kinds of people. "Russia is attacking us!!!!." That kind of traffic is normal in most http/https type applications. Few people look at the logs.

Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Jive with wrote:

You are entirely discounting the Mueller's evidence is a virtual meeting handled via a Trump Tower secret server linking through Alpha Bank.

I know you were just responding to the Trumpbot, but I'm a bit behind on this story.

There is evidence of a "virtual meeting?"

A server communicating with some other server in Russia is not the same thing as a virtual meeting. I have bots trying exploits most hours of most days. I've heard this kind of traffic used to alarm and misdirect all kinds of people. "Russia is attacking us!!!!." That kind of traffic is normal in most http/https type applications. Few people look at the logs.

Virtual meetings are normal in business these days. Look up WebEx.

Jive with wrote:

You are entirely discounting the Mueller's evidence is a virtual meeting handled via a Trump Tower secret server linking through Alpha Bank. Cohen did not "have to be there." Why are you claiming there has to be a "real" meeting or it is a nothingburger? You are wrong to keep driving at that conclusion.

The report from mcclatchy.com was that Cohen was in Prague. I realize it could have been a virtual meeting. That is not what the report states. So if the report is that Cohen was in Prague and he wasn't, it provides no further evidence in the report that Cohen was anywhere but where Cohen stated he was.

pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:

Jive with wrote:

You are entirely discounting the Mueller's evidence is a virtual meeting handled via a Trump Tower secret server linking through Alpha Bank.

I know you were just responding to the Trumpbot, but I'm a bit behind on this story.

There is evidence of a "virtual meeting?"

A server communicating with some other server in Russia is not the same thing as a virtual meeting. I have bots trying exploits most hours of most days. I've heard this kind of traffic used to alarm and misdirect all kinds of people. "Russia is attacking us!!!!." That kind of traffic is normal in most http/https type applications. Few people look at the logs.

Since it is my post the poster you quoted is responding to, how do you figure I am a Trump bot?

All I have said is that the report states definitively that Cohen was in Prague and that Mueller has evidence of this fact according to at least one source. If Cohen was not in Prague at any point as he says that would significantly hurt the report and question the source(s).

The source(s) state nothing about virtual meetings or meetings in other cities or anything other than Prague. Others have tried to change the report....which the report is not unclear about...to other possibilities. Those other possibilities may also be true but that's not what the mcclatchy.com report unequivocally states.

The Fokus wrote:

Jive with wrote:

You are entirely discounting the Mueller's evidence is a virtual meeting handled via a Trump Tower secret server linking through Alpha Bank. Cohen did not "have to be there." Why are you claiming there has to be a "real" meeting or it is a nothingburger? You are wrong to keep driving at that conclusion.

The report from mcclatchy.com was that Cohen was in Prague. I realize it could have been a virtual meeting. That is not what the report states. So if the report is that Cohen was in Prague and he wasn't, it provides no further evidence in the report that Cohen was anywhere but where Cohen stated he was.

The McClathcy DC report uses terms like, "Cohen may indeed have traveled to Prague," and "If the Prague meeting actually occurred."

May have indeed wrote:

The McClathcy DC report uses terms like, "Cohen may indeed have traveled to Prague," and "If the Prague meeting actually occurred."

Line 1 of the mcclatchy report:

"The Justice Department special counsel has evidence that Donald Trump’s personal lawyer and confidant, Michael Cohen, secretly made a late-summer trip to Prague during the 2016 presidential campaign, according to two sources familiar with the matter."

How much more definitive can the article be?

The Fokus wrote:

May have indeed wrote:

The McClathcy DC report uses terms like, "Cohen may indeed have traveled to Prague," and "If the Prague meeting actually occurred."

Line 1 of the mcclatchy report:

"The Justice Department special counsel has evidence that Donald Trump’s personal lawyer and confidant, Michael Cohen, secretly made a late-summer trip to Prague during the 2016 presidential campaign, according to two sources familiar with the matter."

How much more definitive can the article be?

^Trumpkin post.

The Fokus wrote:

May have indeed wrote:

The McClathcy DC report uses terms like, "Cohen may indeed have traveled to Prague," and "If the Prague meeting actually occurred."

Line 1 of the mcclatchy report:

"The Justice Department special counsel has evidence that Donald Trump’s personal lawyer and confidant, Michael Cohen, secretly made a late-summer trip to Prague during the 2016 presidential campaign, according to two sources familiar with the matter."

How much more definitive can the article be?

All three of the quoted parts are in the article. Two by the article author that use may and if. One that says sources say Mueller has evidence of a trip.

Trump Tweeted that attorney-client privilege has gone poof. But what he meant was attorney-criminal acts privilege has never existed.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/trump-all-lawyers-deflated-by-fbi-raid-on-michael-cohen/

Has it wrong wrote:

Trump Tweeted that attorney-client privilege has gone poof. But what he meant was attorney-criminal acts privilege has never existed.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/trump-all-lawyers-deflated-by-fbi-raid-on-michael-cohen/

Since both Cohen and Trump claimed to not have discussed the Stormy payment, there was no communication to begin with, so how could such communication be considered previleged to begin with? They just got their teeth kicked in by Mueller.

As far as Trump’s actions:

His tweets are not effective

His chest pumping is not effective

His policies are not effective

His missile strike is not effective

Trump is impotent.

Webex wrote:

Virtual meetings are normal in business these days. Look up WebEx.

Right... Webex isn't "a Trump server communicates with Russian server."

two sided coin wrote:

All three of the quoted parts are in the article. Two by the article author that use may and if. One that says sources say Mueller has evidence of a trip.

Right. The article states what the source says "Cohen was in Prague and Mueller has proof" and then analyzes the report with "may" and "if".

So if the report from the source is right it is a big deal. If it isn't then this means nothing. Going back a bunch of posts, this is what I said initially. Thanks for pointing that out.