OK country first.
There is a reason he won’t release his medical records, this is not normal. is it too late to replace him?
It is elder abuse.
-
77
-
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Whoa! He's got it bad. Don't think they'll find a cure in time for him.
22 -
agip wrote:
remember all those Republicans who swore they loved legal immigrants, just not 'illegal' ones?
Trump is, of course, going to try to end or severely restrict ALL immigration. But we all knew that, really.
WSJ
WASHINGTON—On the campaign trail, Donald Trump routinely promises he will end illegal immigration. Behind the scenes, his closest advisers and allies are also drawing up plans that would restrict many forms of legal immigration, some of which could affect the ability of businesses to hire foreign workers.
Why don't we just take immigration from countries like Japan and Norway?
84 -
GOP Voter wrote:
OK country first.
There is a reason he won’t release his medical records, this is not normal. is it too late to replace him?
It is elder abuse.
It's hilarious that low-iq/democrats think this video is a bad thing.
Trump is 78 years old, working 7 days a week, long hours, multiple interviews per day, and we're supposed to be concerned that he has an Imperceivable limp while carrying a stack of pizzas to a house of firefighters....
Do the lefties on this site hear themselves... and do they have any level of self perception and rational thought..?
69 -
Trump 2024 Vance 2028 6 wrote:
Why don't we just take immigration from countries like Japan and Norway?
Ask Trump, he had four years to do that and he didn’t.
Has it ever occurred to you that there’s no huge desire for Norwegian or Japanese to emigrate to the US?
76 -
GOP Voter wrote:
OK country first.
There is a reason he won’t release his medical records, this is not normal. is it too late to replace him?
It is elder abuse.
Dragging his right leg badly just walking, worrying.
85 -
Sonnys wrote:
Ghost of Igloi wrote:
Whoa! He's got it bad. Don't think they'll find a cure in time for him.
Crazy eyes are the clue. This Country needs insane asylums.
55 -
Ghost of nothingg wrote:
So... today we have
1. Trump influencers are livid at the idea that women would say they are voting for Trump to their husbands and then vote for Harris in the booth. Some M@ga men are saying that would not be possible in their household because they demand early ballots so they can make sure the wives vote the way they want. They can keep their wives voting in line. Just like it says so in the bible.
Great argument against mail-in ballots!
I've said this on these boards for years: going to the poles, on a specific day with specific identification, and voting in the privacy of a booth is a key element of the integrity of the voting process.
Now Kamala wants to complain about husbands making wives vote a specific way but the greater threat is the "activist" daughter/granddaughter/grandson/caretaker taking the ballots of family members who usually don't vote and coercing them to vote for the Demo-rats (or outright voting for them - fraud).
But bringing up this husband-wife angle gets women angry and that might make them vote... such emotional susceptibility is yet another reason to not allow women to vote.
48 -
krispy kremlin._._._._._ wrote:
Ghost of nothingg wrote:
So... today we have
1. Trump influencers are livid at the idea that women would say they are voting for Trump to their husbands and then vote for Harris in the booth. Some M@ga men are saying that would not be possible in their household because they demand early ballots so they can make sure the wives vote the way they want. They can keep their wives voting in line. Just like it says so in the bible.
Great argument against mail-in ballots!
I've said this on these boards for years: going to the poles, on a specific day with specific identification, and voting in the privacy of a booth is a key element of the integrity of the voting process.
Now Kamala wants to complain about husbands making wives vote a specific way but the greater threat is the "activist" daughter/granddaughter/grandson/caretaker taking the ballots of family members who usually don't vote and coercing them to vote for the Demo-rats (or outright voting for them - fraud).
But bringing up this husband-wife angle gets women angry and that might make them vote... such emotional susceptibility is yet another reason to not allow women to vote.
Which race is tighter the north or south pole?
I am glad we live in a country where you misogynist turds can say the quiet part out loud.
32 -
Trump 2024 Vance 2028 6 wrote:
agip wrote:
remember all those Republicans who swore they loved legal immigrants, just not 'illegal' ones?
Trump is, of course, going to try to end or severely restrict ALL immigration. But we all knew that, really.
WSJ
WASHINGTON—On the campaign trail, Donald Trump routinely promises he will end illegal immigration. Behind the scenes, his closest advisers and allies are also drawing up plans that would restrict many forms of legal immigration, some of which could affect the ability of businesses to hire foreign workers.
Why don't we just take immigration from countries like Japan and Norway?
Pretty good idea. The average IQ of Norway is 100 and the average IQ of Japan is 106. Let's definitely let them come in. Kamala's parents are from Jamaica (average IQ of 75) and India (average IQ of 76). Let's allow Norwegians and Japanese in and throw Kamala the heck out!
47 -
fjb wrote:
Be less gullible.
63 -
krispy kremlin._._._._._ wrote:
Great argument against mail-in ballots!
I've said this on these boards for years: going to the poles, on a specific day with specific identification, and voting in the privacy of a booth is a key element of the integrity of the voting process.
Now Kamala wants to complain about husbands making wives vote a specific way but the greater threat is the "activist" daughter/granddaughter/grandson/caretaker taking the ballots of family members who usually don't vote and coercing them to vote for the Demo-rats (or outright voting for them - fraud).
But bringing up this husband-wife angle gets women angry and that might make them vote... such emotional susceptibility is yet another reason to not allow women to vote.
And there you have it again (earlier by Dee Dee).
Vote for Trump! Because you shouldn't have the right to vote in the first place!
Seems like a winning slogan.
63 -
Every lib will downvote.
They want illegal aliens voting and no mandatory voter ID in presidential elections.
Trump will win, BIGLY.
39 -
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Every lib will downvote.
They want illegal aliens voting and no mandatory voter ID in presidential elections.
Trump will win, BIGLY.
Trump will begin warming up for his victory lap this weekend. Not sure he can make it around the whole lap. But it is more symbolic than anything.
35 -
Sally Vix wrote:
Ghost of Disco Gary wrote:
Every lib will downvote.
They want illegal aliens voting and no mandatory voter ID in presidential elections.
Trump will win, BIGLY.
Trump will begin warming up for his victory lap this weekend. Not sure he can make it around the whole lap. But it is more symbolic than anything.
Perhaps he injured his knee when the Secret Service agents jumped on him during the assassination attempt.
Trump with a bum knee is still lightyears better than an empty suit, empty headed, DEI, special needs, word salad spewing Cackles.
MAGA2024!
This post was edited 13 minutes after it was posted.55 -
Most liberals and conservatives agree that voter registration rolls should be up to date and accurate. But there are rules that keep changes from happening just before the election. This is Federal law, so SCOTUS allowing it is strange. When done just before an election, it certainly has the look of trying to change the outcome.
if the same was done in a swing state by a Democrat Gov., there would be a republican uproar. Rightfully so.
52 -
ProsecuterV.Felon wrote:
Most liberals and conservatives agree that voter registration rolls should be up to date and accurate. But there are rules that keep changes from happening just before the election. This is Federal law, so SCOTUS allowing it is strange. When done just before an election, it certainly has the look of trying to change the outcome.
if the same was done in a swing state by a Democrat Gov., there would be a republican uproar. Rightfully so.
Voter ID must be mandatory nationwide.
Commiefornia banned that. Illegal aliens can vote.
24 -
ProsecuterV.Felon wrote:
Most liberals and conservatives agree that voter registration rolls should be up to date and accurate. But there are rules that keep changes from happening just before the election. This is Federal law, so SCOTUS allowing it is strange. When done just before an election, it certainly has the look of trying to change the outcome.
if the same was done in a swing state by a Democrat Gov., there would be a republican uproar. Rightfully so.
Why should non citizens be on the voter rolls?
23 -
ProsecuterV.Felon wrote:
Most liberals and conservatives agree that voter registration rolls should be up to date and accurate. But there are rules that keep changes from happening just before the election. This is Federal law, so SCOTUS allowing it is strange. When done just before an election, it certainly has the look of trying to change the outcome.
if the same was done in a swing state by a Democrat Gov., there would be a republican uproar. Rightfully so.
If a dem governor in a swing state just before an election, implemented accurate voter registration/mandatory voter ID- it would be welcomed by the GOP and the dems will hate that- it shuts out illegal aliens from voting.
13
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.