If Sage and Cam raced one on one right now at CIM marathon, do you think Sage would still win by a decent amount? I would guess like sage runs 2:29 and Cam runs low 240s
If Sage did upper decker at Cam’s crib, would Cam try to take care of it himself? If it were vice versa maybe Sage would hire janitor and call the police to report it?
If Sage did upper decker at Cam’s crib, would Cam try to take care of it himself? If it were vice versa maybe Sage would hire janitor and call the police to report it?
If this is true then your statement of “every other aspect” is false. Because the geese that eat the commercially altered pellets are not superior in the ability to naturally perform as geese and obtain food that is natural.
Or do you maintain that the geese that consume food that is not natural are superior in all things pertaining to the nature of being a goose?
If the goose only selects pellet food and not natural food then based on your argument its knowledge of selecting food naturally would increase.
However if the pellets were removed due to a shortage of pellets or some kind of anti goose pellet agency then the goose who eats the synthetic pellets would have less knowledge about natural food options than the goose who chose not to eat synthetic foods. Making the natural goose the superior goose.
that goose who chooses its foods naturally and is able to understand the nature of being a goose has the knowledge of being a goose while the other goose has knowledge of eating pellets and will fly with pellet eating geese.
If Sage did upper decker at Cam’s crib, would Cam try to take care of it himself? If it were vice versa maybe Sage would hire janitor and call the police to report it?
Cam doesn't look tall enough to pull it off
With the high fiber of vegan type diet could drop some monster logs
interesting nuance here is that, after many chronic injuries, my Chrio put me on to BPC-157. He essentially laid out a 3 month protocol, including nutrition, exercises and a running program to try to get me moving again. I had never heard of it, and didn't really question whether it was WADA-banned, or performance enhancing. I did consult with a couple Dr's who clued me in to the fact that it was an experimental treatment, that it wasn't well tested, but also that it was promising. They felt that a 3 month cycle wouldn't be the death of me.
And it worked pretty darn well! Recovery changed significantly, progress occurred and I got back to running. I am no where near fit, and no where near racing, but frankly, I don't regret taking it for a few months, and cannot say I wouldn't take it again!
The situation with Cam is different, both because he admitted taking more pointedly performance enhancing drugs like testosterone, but also because he makes money of his athletic persona and thus should be held to different standard IMO. But I'd have to imagine there are a number of folks, who, like me, were guided down the peptide path without fully understanding the ramifications from a governance standpoint.
it will be interesting to see how the science around peptides evolves, and whether they stay on the banned list if/when they are deemed safe.
If Sage did upper decker at Cam’s crib, would Cam try to take care of it himself? If it were vice versa maybe Sage would hire janitor and call the police to report it?
The conservative mindset tends to value self-reliance and DIY competence, while the liberal mindset is generally more comfortable delegating specialized labor
If the goose only selects pellet food and not natural food then based on your argument its knowledge of selecting food naturally would increase.
However if the pellets were removed due to a shortage of pellets or some kind of anti goose pellet agency then the goose who eats the synthetic pellets would have less knowledge about natural food options than the goose who chose not to eat synthetic foods. Making the natural goose the superior goose.
that goose who chooses its foods naturally and is able to understand the nature of being a goose has the knowledge of being a goose while the other goose has knowledge of eating pellets and will fly with pellet eating geese.
Wrong. You can’t introduce a new condition that isn’t part of the original scenario. One could just as easily say a climate or weather decimates the natural food sources. The geese who only eat natural sources not only are not superior, but will go extinct if they refuse to the eat the pellet source. So either assumption changes the mental exercise into something that wasn’t intended and is cheating. Sorry, pellet geese are still superior.
Somebody call out Ken Rideout too. Another obvious doper who profits on being a “fitness influencer/life coach”. Nothing inspiring about either of these guys but the general population is barely functioning at a 4th grade reading level.