"The WSJ refused to show us the letter and conceded they don’t even have it in their possession when we asked them to verify the alleged document they’re basing their ENTIRE fake story on."- Rasmussen Reports
It's just fake news and the all libs fell for it AGAIN.
The TIMES has a video of a 16 year old putting her fist up slick Willies behind.
The verdict was on the appalling lack of intelligence of millions of American voters who voted for the felon.
Or the voters correctly intuited that this was a politically motivated prosecution and set aside the verdict for themselves. Every time the left tries to pull some underhanded crap like this, it backfires. I’d tell you to cope and seethe, but it’s obvious you’re not doing well. How does it feel that you’re still dealing with DJT in 2024 and he’s ramming his bigly agenda down your throat? If you don’t adopt a more reasonable platform, you’re going to be dealing with his handpicked successor in 2028. Personally, I think we can do better and I’m tired of being in the middle while you chimps throw poo at each other over my head. —Sincerely, every reasonable person in the US
There is no "middle". There is only the cult - and everyone else. You pretend otherwise but you are in the cult.
I'm a subscriber of the WSJ. A lot of their 'journalism' is wrong. Half truths and speculation. The comments following articles are from the real world, not some lame journalist.
The WSJ is going to leave the courtroom DEVASTATED!
Correct!
It's going to be so much fun when Trump is going to be required to explain under oath what the "wonderful secret" was he shared with Epstein, as well as every other detail of his relationship with a convicted child abuser whom he described as a "terrific guy".
2) We know for sure Jeffrey Epstein raped children
3) We know for sure Trump was very close personal friends with Epstein
Can we perhaps infer something from those three facts?
WE don't know that Trump has raped anyone
The judge in the defamation case said Trump effectively "raped" E Jean Carroll. He was found to have sexually assaulted her without her consent. That is rape as most decent folks would understand it. Maybe you aren't one of them?
"The WSJ refused to show us the letter and conceded they don’t even have it in their possession when we asked them to verify the alleged document they’re basing their ENTIRE fake story on."- Rasmussen Reports
It's just fake news and the all libs fell for it AGAIN.
The TIMES has a video of a 16 year old putting her fist up slick Willies behind.
Why is Donald Trump protecting Bill Clinton if Clinton is a pedophile?
Why would he do that?
Checkmate.
My guess is that the Epstein list is strong enough to indict one current and three former presidents. Tulsi and Bondi saw the list, Musk heard about it. Bondi wanted to release it, as the list was on her desk. But Trump said no, you cannot do it as Epstein actually worked for me, and the girls were raped on my estates. So Bondi changed her stance, Tusi looked away to focus on crimes committed by democrats only.
I seriously doubt you ever played chess. Now Dungeons and Dragons I can believe!
You were unable to respond to move your way out of check. We managed to checkmate yourself twice ... double checkmate.
"A double checkmate occurs when a player's king [your troll post] is put in check by two pieces simultaneously, and there is no legal move available to escape the check. This situation leads to an immediate loss."
I seriously doubt you ever played chess. Now Dungeons and Dragons I can believe!
You were unable to respond to move your way out of check. We managed to checkmate yourself twice ... double checkmate.
"A double checkmate occurs when a player's king [your troll post] is put in check by two pieces simultaneously, and there is no legal move available to escape the check. This situation leads to an immediate loss."
Or the voters correctly intuited that this was a politically motivated prosecution and set aside the verdict for themselves. Every time the left tries to pull some underhanded crap like this, it backfires. I’d tell you to cope and seethe, but it’s obvious you’re not doing well. How does it feel that you’re still dealing with DJT in 2024 and he’s ramming his bigly agenda down your throat? If you don’t adopt a more reasonable platform, you’re going to be dealing with his handpicked successor in 2028. Personally, I think we can do better and I’m tired of being in the middle while you chimps throw poo at each other over my head. —Sincerely, every reasonable person in the US
There is no "middle". There is only the cult - and everyone else. You pretend otherwise but you are in the cult.
No, not even close. I just know that "what goes around..." You're so blinded by your irrational hatred of the man and his supporters that you want to divide the world into two parts so you can demonize those who disagree with you. Grow up and get off the board for a while. Go for a run, talk to people IRL.
Oh, and for the record, I'm a registered democrat, you moron. I'm telling you that you are contributing to an easy Vance win in 2028. You do realize that by crapping on the middle, you're making a lot more 218-214 votes possible.
Also, you are going to be disappointed when nothing comes of this. If the WSJ really had the goods, they would have done a better job of reporting. This is shabby coverage and will damage their reputation in the end.
You were unable to respond to move your way out of check. We managed to checkmate yourself twice ... double checkmate.
"A double checkmate occurs when a player's king [your troll post] is put in check by two pieces simultaneously, and there is no legal move available to escape the check. This situation leads to an immediate loss."