i am so glad that the sanctity of DL and its finals have been protected, that the series will remain untouched by profit-motive, agents, appearance fees, usual suspect-fields, street circuits, or other distortions. and that only the best from all year manifest for the final, there are never any skippers, it's never a shell of an oly/worlds final because people bailed and they included domestics.
as i said the other day, the basic flaw in this is that unlike say the skiing world cup finals, which pull the top skiiers from the circuit per discipline, they usually no show a chunk of the standings, and so it ends up like a normal meet.
my classic example is alex wilson. used to be a regular at the european DL meets. get enough points to make the final by finishing like 6th in the 100 every time. our equivalent of coleman, who breaks 10 and actually wins races, decides to skip, he makes it.
to me DL is half serious meet -- at the front of each pack -- half show. i think this is the "serious meet" folks elbowing in. now, let's be real, this is post-worlds/oly, it's never a full house, not even if you insist on the rules. but i think this is happening perhaps because michael johnson's circuit and ATL have started getting involved. we're not going to let americans parachute in at the end and do stakes races.
i get the technical point and them trying to protect their series perhaps harder than usual, but you are never fixing the attrition problem this time of year, nor is the DL ever immune to being a business and a show, including meet by meet in the events that qualify one for the final. it's not open entry. it's more like if your local track series got to pick who got what meets and then those meets decided who made the final.
and the thing is i think it's bad for track in general to deny a paulino vs. sydney type showdown. that's the sort of thing that elevates this towards oly and worlds. otherwise this is the afterthought part of the schedule defined as much by who doesn't show up as who does.