we do suspect the initial story of an intruder might not be correct. guy was in his underwear, both men were holding hammers, pelosi apparently called 911 in the bathroom secretly, but then also spoke in "code words" (why not just whisper "help me im in danger" in the bathroom?)
officer mentions he sounds confused (likely drunk....)
referred to the man as his friend
I'm thinking drunk lover meetup gone awry, pelosi calls in to police drunk (remember he got a dui recently), they both grab hammers, someone breaks the glass door upstairs in their lover fight(hence glass shattering outside vs inside)
Police show up see a younger guy in his underwear, and an old rich man and assume lovers tyst. they both make a lunge at each other in the scuffle and younger guy hits pelosi slightly in his head (if he took a full swing at a 80 year old male, he would NOT be surviving that!).
pelosi's fondness for SF "nightlife" is well known to the Democrat party elite, so the moment this breaks they go do a FULL COURT PRESS about an intruder story to buy time and dig up as much dirt on the scorned lover to make him look like a deranged idiot/stalker.
Pure gold.
Thanks for the laugh.
why did he refer to the intruder as his friend on the phone?
if you were speaking to police in "code words", would that be your code?
why did he refer to the intruder as his friend on the phone?
if you were speaking to police in "code words", would that be your code?
the police describe it as forced entry. Are they part of the cover up? And there are broken door glass in the back of the house where he got in. Did they fake that?
From San Francisco Chronicle:
"During a Friday evening briefing, San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott confirmed that the assailant who broke into the Pelosi's home in Pacific Heights early in the morning gained entry through the rear door. Investigators believe the intruder broke through glass-paneled doors, according to two people familiar with the situation who spoke to the Associated Press."
So the whole police force is part of the cover up? Not one squealer amongst them, I suppose? Hmmm.
STFU. You are a waste of time for anyone with half a brain.
why did he refer to the intruder as his friend on the phone?
if you were speaking to police in "code words", would that be your code?
the police describe it as forced entry. Are they part of the cover up? And there are broken door glass in the back of the house where he got in. Did they fake that?
From San Francisco Chronicle:
"During a Friday evening briefing, San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott confirmed that the assailant who broke into the Pelosi's home in Pacific Heights early in the morning gained entry through the rear door. Investigators believe the intruder broke through glass-paneled doors, according to two people familiar with the situation who spoke to the Associated Press."
So the whole police force is part of the cover up? Not one squealer amongst them, I suppose? Hmmm.
STFU. You are a waste of time for anyone with half a brain.
And you stooped pretty low here, jamin.
"familiar with the situation"
right now those are just the initial reports. they are already conflicting (one says he made a call from bathroom secretly, one says he called and spoke in code words, one said they were in underwear (which another refuted).
I also find it weird this intruder let him go to bathroom by himself, was ok with him talking on the phone (in code words), and ONLY attacked once police arrived.
Do you also find it suspicious that the attacker's family have released statements about how the attacker is psychotic, troubled, and violent, and attribute his violence to a violent upbringing, etc?
That's his family.IF there was some kind of affair going on, don't you think his family would be questioning the premise?
They clearly said he's violent and uncontrollable. It seems they would have every reason in the world to find and know of something more, but they are not saying a peep along those lines. Did they get bought off. Or are they part of the deep state, too?
I wish at least one of you guys would type out what it is you don't buy. You don't buy that Paul Pelosi is in the hospital? Don't buy that someone has been arrested? The guy who was arrested is a fake? Paul Pelosi faked his injuries? There was no 911 call? The FBI or the cops or the DNC staged the whole thing?
I'm seriously asking.
we dont buy the intruder part.
obviously he was hurt
obviously someone call 911
a guy was arrested
We dont even think anything was staged
we do suspect the initial story of an intruder might not be correct. guy was in his underwear, both men were holding hammers, pelosi apparently called 911 in the bathroom secretly, but then also spoke in "code words" (why not just whisper "help me im in danger" in the bathroom?)
officer mentions he sounds confused (likely drunk....)
referred to the man as his friend
I'm thinking drunk lover meetup gone awry, pelosi calls in to police drunk (remember he got a dui recently), they both grab hammers, someone breaks the glass door upstairs in their lover fight(hence glass shattering outside vs inside)
Police show up see a younger guy in his underwear, and an old rich man and assume lovers tyst. they both make a lunge at each other in the scuffle and younger guy hits pelosi slightly in his head (if he took a full swing at a 80 year old male, he would NOT be surviving that!).
pelosi's fondness for SF "nightlife" is well known to the Democrat party elite, so the moment this breaks they go do a FULL COURT PRESS about an intruder story to buy time and dig up as much dirt on the scorned lover to make him look like a deranged idiot/stalker.
Okay, I get it. All that is possible. The later cover-up conspiracy aspects you refer to seem kind of nuts, but I get that you could reasonably speculate that Pelosi invited the guy over and they got into a fight, it got out of hand, and the cops were called/alerted. If that is true and Pelosi invited him over and this was some drunken lover's quarrel, I'd bet we find that out from the police in the next 2-5 days.
I don't think you are really disputing much of anything, since I don't think the police have said one way or the other what, if any, relationship Paul Pelosi had to the guy they arrested or whether he was invited in or not. I doubt they even know yet at this early stage.
Some other posters here seemed to be actually disputing everything - some even suggesting all of it was all planned and staged by the Pelosis in conjunction with various others (presumably the FBI, Deep State, all the usual suspects) to somehow help with the elections coming up next month.
The same LRC posters that don't buy this story that this guy was a trumper are the same people that still believe Jan 6 was not Trumpers.
And the Perp believed that one too! If you read this guy's manifesto you would think you were reading one of Carmin or Adult's posts on this message board.
Here is a little contest. Post a wackadoodle right wing Q-Anon inspired conspiracy or statement and you have to guess whether it came from Carmine, Adult or David DePape.
Here is the first one:
"The elites ruling class never censor themselves, you can still turn on any mainstream news channel and hear day and night the narrative put forth by the people that rule you"?
You’re blaming Trump for the actions of a California hemp and Green Party activist?
Yes, if: "DePape was known for embracing multiple conspiracy theories on subjects such as voter fraud, climate change, and the COVID pandemic on different online forums. He also has posted antisemitic screeds and videos from 'My Pillow' founder and Donald Trump sycophant Mike Lindell."
Actually, this guy comes across similar to a number of LRC's adherents to the TDC (Trump Death Cult). We should check to see whether any of our RWNJ regulars aren't posting today.
Here is a little contest. Post a wackadoodle right wing Q-Anon inspired conspiracy or statement and you have to guess whether it came from Carmine, Adult or David DePape.
Here is the first one:
"The elites ruling class never censor themselves, you can still turn on any mainstream news channel and hear day and night the narrative put forth by the people that rule you"?
Imagine thinking that statement is not true. And is a good example of crazy thinking!
Who do you think owns the media? The middle class?
It's crazy to think that the elites use propaganda to push their own selfish agenda?
Here is a little contest. Post a wackadoodle right wing Q-Anon inspired conspiracy or statement and you have to guess whether it came from Carmine, Adult or David DePape.
Here is the first one:
"The elites ruling class never censor themselves, you can still turn on any mainstream news channel and hear day and night the narrative put forth by the people that rule you"?
Imagine thinking that statement is not true. And is a good example of crazy thinking!
Who do you think owns the media? The middle class?
It's crazy to think that the elites use propaganda to push their own selfish agenda?
The Left used to know this stuff.
Now the propagandists have the suckers calling this "wackadoodle right wing Q-Anon inspired conspiracy"
why did he refer to the intruder as his friend on the phone?
if you were speaking to police in "code words", would that be your code?
the police describe it as forced entry. Are they part of the cover up? And there are broken door glass in the back of the house where he got in. Did they fake that?
From San Francisco Chronicle:
"During a Friday evening briefing, San Francisco Police Chief Bill Scott confirmed that the assailant who broke into the Pelosi's home in Pacific Heights early in the morning gained entry through the rear door. Investigators believe the intruder broke through glass-paneled doors, according to two people familiar with the situation who spoke to the Associated Press."
So the whole police force is part of the cover up? Not one squealer amongst them, I suppose? Hmmm.
STFU. You are a waste of time for anyone with half a brain.
And you stooped pretty low here, jamin.
Yeah, Canadian nudist just busts in in his undies --- that's his fetish!
And Paul Pelosi is nothing if not a believable witness, though one hooes he's being truthful with his insider stock tips.
Thoughts & prayers, was the Canadian nudist wearing a mask? #StaySafe #InItTigether
The best thing about this thread is capturing on record all the people who instantly believed the (obvious) lie that this was some kind of right wing terrorist assault. It was not that. The police scanner audio is the smoking gun that Paul knew David and the visit was consensual.
The sad part is how many people both here, in the broader media, and around the county bought this fake story hook, line, and sinker and ran with it.
The infuriating part about this story is how a national leader can be so poisonous that she would deliberately push a false narrative, knowing full well how it would play out across the country.
The good news is that Internet sleuths (definitely NOT the mainstream media) needed less than a day to pick apart the lie. It'll take a while for the truth to seep out to the masses, but that seepage is ongoing and picking up steam.
As for Paul's predilections, "not that there's anything wrong with that."
The best thing about this thread is capturing on record all the people who instantly believed the (obvious) lie that this was some kind of right wing terrorist assault. It was not that. The police scanner audio is the smoking gun that Paul knew David and the visit was consensual.
The sad part is how many people both here, in the broader media, and around the county bought this fake story hook, line, and sinker and ran with it.
The infuriating part about this story is how a national leader can be so poisonous that she would deliberately push a false narrative, knowing full well how it would play out across the country.
The good news is that Internet sleuths (definitely NOT the mainstream media) needed less than a day to pick apart the lie. It'll take a while for the truth to seep out to the masses, but that seepage is ongoing and picking up steam.
As for Paul's predilections, "not that there's anything wrong with that."
There has been nothing published by any legitimate source to suggest that this was anything other than an unwelcomed intruder.
When the police arrived, they noted that the intruder was saying, “Where’s Nancy?” as Paul tried to take the hammer away from him.
Why is this so hard to believe, that in a country where a lot of people have deep mental health problems, someone’s violence would fixate on Nancy Pelosi? In May, a guy drove 200 miles shot all the Black people he could at a grocery store in Buffalo because of fears of the Great Replacement. Why is that believable but this isn’t?
You read like a left wing person who denies that Steve Scalise was shot by an anti-Trump terrorist. But he was. Steve Scalise was shot by a man who was rabidly anti-Trump. The fact that I think Trump is the worst person to hold the office of President since the invention of the automobile doesn’t make me doubt that some lunatic who hated Trump went violent against a public GOP official. I’m not going to cherry pick or try to concoct my own narrative to help that shooting fit an ideology, that my guys are good and it’s the other guys who are wrong.
The best thing about this thread is capturing on record all the people who instantly believed the (obvious) lie that this was some kind of right wing terrorist assault. It was not that. The police scanner audio is the smoking gun that Paul knew David and the visit was consensual.
The sad part is how many people both here, in the broader media, and around the county bought this fake story hook, line, and sinker and ran with it.
The infuriating part about this story is how a national leader can be so poisonous that she would deliberately push a false narrative, knowing full well how it would play out across the country.
The good news is that Internet sleuths (definitely NOT the mainstream media) needed less than a day to pick apart the lie. It'll take a while for the truth to seep out to the masses, but that seepage is ongoing and picking up steam.
As for Paul's predilections, "not that there's anything wrong with that."
There has been nothing published by any legitimate source to suggest that this was anything other than an unwelcomed intruder.
When the police arrived, they noted that the intruder was saying, “Where’s Nancy?” as Paul tried to take the hammer away from him.
Why is this so hard to believe, that in a country where a lot of people have deep mental health problems, someone’s violence would fixate on Nancy Pelosi? In May, a guy drove 200 miles shot all the Black people he could at a grocery store in Buffalo because of fears of the Great Replacement. Why is that believable but this isn’t?
You read like a left wing person who denies that Steve Scalise was shot by an anti-Trump terrorist. But he was. Steve Scalise was shot by a man who was rabidly anti-Trump. The fact that I think Trump is the worst person to hold the office of President since the invention of the automobile doesn’t make me doubt that some lunatic who hated Trump went violent against a public GOP official. I’m not going to cherry pick or try to concoct my own narrative to help that shooting fit an ideology, that my guys are good and it’s the other guys who are wrong.
In his undies?
Dud he arrive clothed and then disrobe, as Canadian nudists are wont to do, or did he arrive naked, and skip into a pair of Nancy's sheerest red satin panties?
The same LRC posters that don't buy this story that this guy was a trumper are the same people that still believe Jan 6 was not Trumpers.
And the Perp believed that one too! If you read this guy's manifesto you would think you were reading one of Carmin or Adult's posts on this message board.
They will jump to whatever explanation confirms their world view, even if it means ignoring the obvious simple explanation. The Election was Stolen by Mules and Fake Ballots! All those public health professionals are lying to us! All those thousands of people beating Capitol Police and pushing in doors and chanting "Kill Mike Pence" were... somehow tricked into it by Anti-Fascists? No they were tricked into attacking our democracy by TRUMP, Flynn, MyPillowAddict, etc. This latest event is just more of the same. They need to get a clue and back away from the Tuckers and Trumps etc.
There has been nothing published by any legitimate source to suggest that this was anything other than an unwelcomed intruder.
When the police arrived, they noted that the intruder was saying, “Where’s Nancy?” as Paul tried to take the hammer away from him.
Why is this so hard to believe, that in a country where a lot of people have deep mental health problems, someone’s violence would fixate on Nancy Pelosi? In May, a guy drove 200 miles shot all the Black people he could at a grocery store in Buffalo because of fears of the Great Replacement. Why is that believable but this isn’t?
You read like a left wing person who denies that Steve Scalise was shot by an anti-Trump terrorist. But he was. Steve Scalise was shot by a man who was rabidly anti-Trump. The fact that I think Trump is the worst person to hold the office of President since the invention of the automobile doesn’t make me doubt that some lunatic who hated Trump went violent against a public GOP official. I’m not going to cherry pick or try to concoct my own narrative to help that shooting fit an ideology, that my guys are good and it’s the other guys who are wrong.
In his undies?
Dud he arrive clothed and then disrobe, as Canadian nudists are wont to do, or did he arrive naked, and skip into a pair of Nancy's sheerest red satin panties?
Can you cite something about the suspect’s state of dress?
It’s not mentioned in reports the NY Post, Fox News or Newsmax.
The guy is clearly nuts (but not all that abnormal for Berkeley). And this was a dastardly act. But some of the same people on the left that are up in arms about this are okay with selective enforcement by the DOJ not cracking down on illegal protests at Supreme Court justices’ homes, not acting on fire bombing and other acts of vandalism at pregnancy centers, etc. Yes, this guy is a nut job, and he deserves to be institutionalized, but let’s start prosecuting those who terrorize the other side of the aisle as well.
Fellas is protesting the same a breaking into a house and cracking a guys skull with a hammer?
Absolutely!!
Protesting at a Judges private residence is actually intimidation and is illegal.
Those protests actually did result in an assassination attempt on one of the judges, which people on the right were warning about, and the intruder came armed with a firearm. But that story was buried on page 40 of the New York Times so it didn't happen cause its only a crime when people on the right do it, when its from the left they had a super good reason.
