Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

LOL ... You just cannot make up stuff like the following. John Boehner [Republican; some Trumper fools who post here won't know who he is/was] who was against marijuana is now pro marijuana, He is going the board of a cannabis company. Well, views like that do not just evolve--for old white conservatives--, they were there a long time ago. Odds are 100% that Boehner was a pothead, as well as an alcoholic, while Speaker of the House.

LINK:

https://www.cnn.com/2018/04/11/politics/boehner-cannabis-company-board/index.html

And here comes the ultimate distraction, watch for Trump to order a couple of missile attacks in Syria over the next couple of weeks. This is something we should all fear with this guy. When the wheels come off he may do something drastically stupid that will cost lives and escalate international conflict.

Another couple of promises he's breaking. He said he would get out of Syria, but we are still meddling. He said he would be militarily unpredictable, but he just tweeted what he's going to do. He's losing it bigly, reacting to taunts by Russian politicians. Had enough yet Gary?

Repub Pothead wrote:

LOL ... You just cannot make up stuff like the following. John Boehner [Republican; some Trumper fools who post here won't know who he is/was] who was against marijuana is now pro marijuana, He is going the board of a cannabis company. Well, views like that do not just evolve--for old white conservatives--, they were there a long time ago. Odds are 100% that Boehner was a pothead, as well as an alcoholic, while Speaker of the House.

Yep, just like there are no homosexual conservatives. It’s the party of ignorance and denial. The Orange One is it’s leader, does the opposite of everything they say they stand for but they adore him.

Trollminator wrote:

Repub Pothead wrote:

LOL ... You just cannot make up stuff like the following. John Boehner [Republican; some Trumper fools who post here won't know who he is/was] who was against marijuana is now pro marijuana, He is going the board of a cannabis company. Well, views like that do not just evolve--for old white conservatives--, they were there a long time ago. Odds are 100% that Boehner was a pothead, as well as an alcoholic, while Speaker of the House.

Yep, just like there are no homosexual conservatives. It’s the party of ignorance and denial. The Orange One is it’s leader, does the opposite of everything they say they stand for but they adore him.

Party of ignorance? Hey idiot - it is “its” and not “it’s” : that is a contraction you effing idiot!

Peter pup wrote:

Hey idiot - it is “its” and not “it’s” : that is a contraction you effing idiot!

ARRRGGGHHHHHHH!!!!!! I should not have a space between the "smart" quote and my colon. What an offing idiot I am. ARRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!!

Trollminator wrote:

And here comes the ultimate distraction, watch for Trump to order a couple of missile attacks in Syria over the next couple of weeks. This is something we should all fear with this guy. When the wheels come off he may do something drastically stupid that will cost lives and escalate international conflict.

Another couple of promises he's breaking. He said he would get out of Syria, but we are still meddling. He said he would be militarily unpredictable, but he just tweeted what he's going to do. He's losing it bigly, reacting to taunts by Russian politicians. Had enough yet Gary?

Are Democrats who created fake accusations of Russians "hacking our elections" and "colluding with Trump" now concerned that our relations with Russia have become critical? Really? Democrats are willing to stoke WWIII with Russia to cover for losing an election and now we're hearing conspiracy theories that Trump is doing this to avoid the persecution news. I know you're in the rat maze, but did they make you check your brain at the door?

Consider this. If Trump really had colluded with Russia, Putin could take out Trump RIGHT NOW by simply providing the evidence. Why isn't he doing that?

But I'm not sure what we should be doing in Syria. It's not clear to me who set off the gas or who our friends or enemies really are. We should be very slow to get into a shooting war with Russia. But again, Democrats are no help at all in any of this. Their only goal is to take out Trump, and that mania makes them useless in dealing with the important problems.

DiscoGary wrote:

Consider this. If Trump really had colluded with Russia, Putin could take out Trump RIGHT NOW by simply providing the evidence. Why isn't he doing that?

YAWN. You are totally clueless. Trump is Putin's ill-gotten money washing machine.

Oh, and Clinton dropped bombs on an aspirin factory in the Sudan to wipe the Lewinsky scandal off the headlines. Remember that?

Democrats = always doing what they accuse others of doing. Always.

DiscoGary wrote:

Consider this. If Trump really had colluded with Russia, Putin could take out Trump RIGHT NOW by simply providing the evidence. Why isn't he doing that?

Putin's objective has always been to sow discord and chaos in the US political processes thus making the administration less effective. Why would he want to "take out Trump"?

If Putin has Trump in his pocket why on earth would he reveal that and throw away his advantage??? Last time I checked Putin doesn’t work for the USA. Putin = 3D chess player, Trump = marbles

DiscoGary wrote:

Oh, and Clinton dropped bombs on an aspirin factory in the Sudan to wipe the Lewinsky scandal off the headlines. Remember that?

Democrats = always doing what they accuse others of doing. Always.

Trump was on pace to quadruple the number the civilians killed in his "war" on ISIS, as compared to Obama. Oh, and then there are the children Trump has murdered.

Here's an excellent description of the problems created by the raid on Trump's lawyer:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/04/11/trump-is-right-fbi-raids-against-his-attorney-michael-cohen-threaten-everyones-rights.html

The legacy of this abuse is likely to haunt us long after Trump is gone. It's kind like poisoning all the water just to take out one guy. It might work, but at what cost?

DiscoGary wrote:

Here's an excellent description of the problems created by the raid on Trump's lawyer:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/04/11/trump-is-right-fbi-raids-against-his-attorney-michael-cohen-threaten-everyones-rights.html

The legacy of this abuse is likely to haunt us long after Trump is gone. It's kind like poisoning all the water just to take out one guy. It might work, but at what cost?

I'll throw you a bone here DG. I do agree that regardless of the outcome of the Mueller investigation and regardless of whether or not any crimes occurred, the 2016 election set a bad precedent for the country. I fear that in the future, whichever party loses the election will seek to delegitimize the winner. I suppose the trend could really be traced back to the 2000 election, though I think it was a fluke that the electoral college was so close.

This isn't to say that I think the investigation should be stopped, or that the ends justify the means when it comes to getting elected, but I think most people would agree that our democracy functions best when everyone has faith in the system. Claims that "Russia hacked the election" (which is not the same as "Russia influenced the election") further undermine that faith.

Loving this Cohen raid - the Feds and NYS prosecutors are going to pull on a thread that eventually leads to all the money laundering and tax evasion Trump and his companies have done for years and years. Following the Stormy Daniels payoff and other NDAs will walk prosecutors through all the slush funds, all the off shore accounts.

This is the beginning of the end, Trumpers, and Trump knows it.

DiscoGary wrote:

Here's an excellent description of the problems created by the raid on Trump's lawyer:

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/04/11/trump-is-right-fbi-raids-against-his-attorney-michael-cohen-threaten-everyones-rights.html

The legacy of this abuse is likely to haunt us long after Trump is gone. It's kind like poisoning all the water just to take out one guy. It might work, but at what cost?

your argument is that it is better to allow the president to be above the law. Ok. Understood where you are coming from politically.

Or maybe your post sounded better in the original German.

rucker wrote:

your argument is that it is better to allow the president to be above the law. Ok. Understood where you are coming from politically.

Or maybe your post sounded better in the original German.

Gary thinks there was never any basis for Mueller to begin investigating so all of this is unlawful, even if they find something. I'd say it's already been more than worth it with the Russians that have been formally accused and the few Trump buddies who confessed to crimes. But Gary doesn't understand that proof doesn't need to exist BEFORE an investigation commences in order for one to open. Trump is not in court right now, no charges have been brought against him and no one is asking him to provide defensive evidence here... yet Gary thinks this is all so unfair. Even if it turns out Trump broke laws with undisputable criminal evidence, Gary will say its unfair and that this is a good guy who should not be impeached. He would be ok with a criminal in the WH, in this case.

rucker wrote:

Loving this Cohen raid - the Feds and NYS prosecutors are going to pull on a thread that eventually leads to all the money laundering and tax evasion Trump and his companies have done for years and years. Following the Stormy Daniels payoff and other NDAs will walk prosecutors through all the slush funds, all the off shore accounts.

This is the beginning of the end, Trumpers, and Trump knows it.

Best of all. That part is in the hands of the Feds and NY State. Firing Mueller/Rosenstein, and stopping the Russian Thing will have ZERO effect on the "other" investigation. Trump can do absolutely nothing about a Tax/State investigation.