If they find serious crimes on Michael Cohen he could be one more person with the goods on Trump that could make a plea deal to a lesser crime to avoid jail time.
I heard he would take a bullet for Trump but would he expose himself to jailhouse rape?
Rosenstein OUT! Breaking news!!! wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
He is not happy with Rosenstein or Sessions and cannot afford to have either of them publicly speaking out against him if he tries to shut down Mueller. If he wants to get rid of Mueller he has to get rid of the opposers.
.....and he fires Rosenstein....
I see the rumor but no confirmation yet. If true easily predictable.
Also, Dersh seems to be unhinged as well. He had dinner with Trump tonight. Dersh should join the Trump team, he seems desperate to go out like a flame anyway.
L L wrote:
If they find serious crimes on Michael Cohen he could be one more person with the goods on Trump that could make a plea deal to a lesser crime to avoid jail time.
I heard he would take a bullet for Trump but would he expose himself to jailhouse rape?
Nope he told reporters today he would consider his options because if his family. Often those who bark loudly have no bite.
Trollminator wrote:
Rosenstein OUT! Breaking news!!! wrote:
.....and he fires Rosenstein....
I see the rumor but no confirmation yet. If true easily predictable.
Also, Dersh seems to be unhinged as well. He had dinner with Trump tonight. Dersh should join the Trump team, he seems desperate to go out like a flame anyway.
Evidently the raid is related in part to a NYC cabbie business Cohen owns. The best story about the ins and out of the business is in the Huffington Post: involvement with very shady characters to avoid paying NY taxes. Other news outlets will put parts of this puzzle together.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/michael-cohen-taxis-trump_us_5acd29fde4b06a6aac8cb374Don't worry, guys. Mueller is going to connect all the dots. He was able to connect all the dots on Iraq and WMDs; surely he'll be able to connect Stormy Daniels to Putin.
jamin wrote:
Don't worry, guys. Mueller is going to connect all the dots. He was able to connect all the dots on Iraq and WMDs; surely he'll be able to connect Stormy Daniels to Putin.
Oops. You forgot to change you handle when posting to this thread. Yeah, we know you post a lot here but rarely using you real name.
Oops!!!!! wrote:
jamin wrote:
Don't worry, guys. Mueller is going to connect all the dots. He was able to connect all the dots on Iraq and WMDs; surely he'll be able to connect Stormy Daniels to Putin.
Oops. You forgot to change you handle when posting to this thread. Yeah, we know you post a lot here but rarely using you real name.
No, he doesn't, but he wrongly gets blamed for it.
Flagpole wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Plumbers make good money, my wife's father was one, owned his own business, had a paid off house, put 3 kids through college. Never graduated from HS. Retired at age 65, lived till he was 80. Traveled extensively prior to his death. Smarter than most people I know even though he never got out of HS. Worked his ass off. UNLIKE HRC who has ridden Bills coattails her entire life. If Trump's a Plumber than HRC is nothing but a welfare recipient, and one thats not deserving of the welfare she has received. And I hesitate to call her a welfare recipient, because its really an insult to those recipients who really need it, and are on it through no fault of their own.
Dude, you miss the point. This was not disparaging plumbers. The point is that we hired someone without the proper knowledge.
For perhaps the millionth time, those of us who are against Trump are so because of his actions. It has NOTHING to do with Hillary Clinton. We are anti-Trump, NOT pro-Hillary Clinton.
You are on an island and you have to eat something. The only sources of food on the island are things that cause you trouble.
1st item - causes headaches
2nd item - causes headaches and vomiting
1st item is Hillary Clinton
2nd item is Donald J. Trump
We HAD to pick the lesser of two evils, and that was back in November 2016. Trump has shown since then that he also causes dry mouth, itchy red rashes, and anal bleeding.
Your analogy is back asswards. That being said, I'd rather have had someone in there with no political experience then someone as obviously politically corrupt and incompetent as HRC. I'd also add to your backwards analogy that HRC in the WH would also have been the equivalent of a colonoscopy and root canal, without anesthesia.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Dude, you miss the point. This was not disparaging plumbers. The point is that we hired someone without the proper knowledge.
For perhaps the millionth time, those of us who are against Trump are so because of his actions. It has NOTHING to do with Hillary Clinton. We are anti-Trump, NOT pro-Hillary Clinton.
You are on an island and you have to eat something. The only sources of food on the island are things that cause you trouble.
1st item - causes headaches
2nd item - causes headaches and vomiting
1st item is Hillary Clinton
2nd item is Donald J. Trump
We HAD to pick the lesser of two evils, and that was back in November 2016. Trump has shown since then that he also causes dry mouth, itchy red rashes, and anal bleeding.
Your analogy is back asswards. That being said, I'd rather have had someone in there with no political experience then someone as obviously politically corrupt and incompetent as HRC. I'd also add to your backwards analogy that HRC in the WH would also have been the equivalent of a colonoscopy and root canal, without anesthesia.
It also appears that most, if not all have given up on the Putin collusion angle. OOJ seems to be out also. Now its the porn star/lawyer angle. Next it will be the lawyer/taxi cab angle. I wonder what it will be after that. Its all getting quite tiresome.
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
It also appears that most, if not all have given up on the Putin collusion angle. OOJ seems to be out also. Now its the porn star/lawyer angle. Next it will be the lawyer/taxi cab angle. I wonder what it will be after that. Its all getting quite tiresome.
I don't see where anybody has given up on anything.
You see, criminals often commit more than one crime.
But it's understandable if you are tired of reading about all the bad things that bad people do.
What is not understandable is why you would think that today's headline negates yesterday's headline.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
It also appears that most, if not all have given up on the Putin collusion angle. OOJ seems to be out also.
You seem to be confusing "have given up" with "indictments have not yet been issued".
Now its the porn star/lawyer angle. Next it will be the lawyer/taxi cab angle. I wonder what it will be after that. Its all getting quite tiresome.
It's hard to move on from Monica Lewinsky after only two decades, isn't it?
Fat hurts wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
It also appears that most, if not all have given up on the Putin collusion angle. OOJ seems to be out also. Now its the porn star/lawyer angle. Next it will be the lawyer/taxi cab angle. I wonder what it will be after that. Its all getting quite tiresome.
I don't see where anybody has given up on anything.
You see, criminals often commit more than one crime.
But it's understandable if you are tired of reading about all the bad things that bad people do.
What is not understandable is why you would think that today's headline negates yesterday's headline.
Because yesterdays headlines regarding Russian collusion have been persisting for a year, without evidence. Which was the original intent of the investigation. Where is the evidence of criminality, collusion or OOJ relative to this?? Crickets. The media have also given up on finding anything substantive. So on to the next attempt to remove Trump.............and the next, and the next. He screwed a hooker. So did JFK and likely any number of other Presidents. Thats a matter between him and his wife. Trump won. time to get over it. Want him out? Vote him out next election cycle. This constant barrage of ever increasing distraction and harassment with no end in sight, and no evidence of wrongdoing, relative to the original intent of the investigation is whats tiresome. I would suggest to you that the issues in Syria, North Korea, on the border et al is what the Presidents focus should be. All of this other BS pales in comparison.
Well, Paul Ryan isn't running for re-election.
How bad is it when the party in control can't even get it's Speaker of the House to run? Sad!
Monkeys typing wrote:
[quote]OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
It also appears that most, if not all have given up on the Putin collusion angle. OOJ seems to be out also.
You seem to be confusing "have given up" with "indictments have not yet been issued".
Now its the porn star/lawyer angle. Next it will be the lawyer/taxi cab angle. I wonder what it will be after that. Its all getting quite tiresome.
It's hard to move on from Monica Lewinsky after only two decades, isn't it?[/quote]
^This last bit....what is wrong with old white conservative men? Why are the obsessed with Clinton? It’s also hilariously hypocritical to note that after all the investigations into and conspiracy theories about Bill Clinton (Vince Foster, Whitewater, Paula Jones, etc. etc.) during his time as POTUS what got him in the most trouble and the only thing proven to be true was the Lewinsky affair. Yet, RWNJs talk about ALL OF IT as if where proven beyond a shadow of a doubt AND say the Stormy Daniels (and other women) -Trump thing is no big deal. They fail to see the similarities between Clinton and Trump.
I think Clinton should’ve been removed from office and Trump should be removed now. The only alternative reasonable, intellectual honest position is that neither should be / should’ve been removed from office.
Monkeys typing wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
It also appears that most, if not all have given up on the Putin collusion angle. OOJ seems to be out also.
You seem to be confusing "have given up" with "indictments have not yet been issued".
Now its the porn star/lawyer angle. Next it will be the lawyer/taxi cab angle. I wonder what it will be after that. Its all getting quite tiresome.
It's hard to move on from Monica Lewinsky after only two decades, isn't it?
Nor will they. The focus on ML is only to only the point that Democrats are hypocrites. They accuse Trump of being the "lowest" POTUS on the character scale, however conveniently forget about both JFK and WJC, both who were quite a bit lower on that scale. Thus the reference.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Dude, you miss the point. This was not disparaging plumbers. The point is that we hired someone without the proper knowledge.
For perhaps the millionth time, those of us who are against Trump are so because of his actions. It has NOTHING to do with Hillary Clinton. We are anti-Trump, NOT pro-Hillary Clinton.
You are on an island and you have to eat something. The only sources of food on the island are things that cause you trouble.
1st item - causes headaches
2nd item - causes headaches and vomiting
1st item is Hillary Clinton
2nd item is Donald J. Trump
We HAD to pick the lesser of two evils, and that was back in November 2016. Trump has shown since then that he also causes dry mouth, itchy red rashes, and anal bleeding.
Your analogy is back asswards. That being said, I'd rather have had someone in there with no political experience then someone as obviously politically corrupt and incompetent as HRC. I'd also add to your backwards analogy that HRC in the WH would also have been the equivalent of a colonoscopy and root canal, without anesthesia.
Well, your opinion on that has proven to be foolhardy. Everyone associated with Trump for longer than a few minutes is corrupt. Michael Cohen is going to be indicted. Trump is going to try to get Rosenstein fired so that he can work on Mueller, and that will be his end (though, there are many paths to his end, so I can't pick the one for sure that will be it, but he will meet his political end and perhaps even the end of his freedom).
Lots of reasons to not like Hillary Clinton, but she is far from incompetent. Donald Trump is the person who fits that description.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
That being said, I'd rather have had someone in there with no political experience then someone as obviously politically corrupt and incompetent as HRC.
You really don't see Trump as corrupt.
He and his family are making tons of money off of his presidency.
He makes extra money off Mar-a-Lago.
Extra off of his DC hotel.
He employed his daughter and son-in-law (who can't get even a security clearance).
He keeps Scott Pruitt head of the EPA despite his main goal being to get rid of the EPA and he spends tons of tax payer money (so swampy).
His lawyer pays off women with money from who knows where to be quiet.
And Trump can't see, to hire smart people and keep them there.
Nothingburger in 2018 same as 1996? wrote:
Monkeys typing wrote:
[quote]OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
It also appears that most, if not all have given up on the Putin collusion angle. OOJ seems to be out also.
You seem to be confusing "have given up" with "indictments have not yet been issued".
Now its the porn star/lawyer angle. Next it will be the lawyer/taxi cab angle. I wonder what it will be after that. Its all getting quite tiresome.
It's hard to move on from Monica Lewinsky after only two decades, isn't it?[/quote]
^This last bit....what is wrong with old white conservative men? Why are the obsessed with Clinton? It’s also hilariously hypocritical to note that after all the investigations into and conspiracy theories about Bill Clinton (Vince Foster, Whitewater, Paula Jones, etc. etc.) during his time as POTUS what got him in the most trouble and the only thing proven to be true was the Lewinsky affair. Yet, RWNJs talk about ALL OF IT as if where proven beyond a shadow of a doubt AND say the Stormy Daniels (and other women) -Trump thing is no big deal. They fail to see the similarities between Clinton and Trump.
I think Clinton should’ve been removed from office and Trump should be removed now. The only alternative reasonable, intellectual honest position is that neither should be / should’ve been removed from office.
I would suggest to you that nothings wrong. Clinton should in fact have been removed, but was not. He had his affair while he was in office and lied about his affair with ML.........while in office. BIG difference. Trump screwed a hooker quite some time ago, before he was a candidate. Clinton also. I gave him a pass on that. As did most people. However what happened between Clinton and ML was while he was POTUS. Quite a big difference between Trump and Clinton.
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
OLD SMTC SOB wrote:
Your analogy is back asswards. That being said, I'd rather have had someone in there with no political experience then someone as obviously politically corrupt and incompetent as HRC. I'd also add to your backwards analogy that HRC in the WH would also have been the equivalent of a colonoscopy and root canal, without anesthesia.
It also appears that most, if not all have given up on the Putin collusion angle. OOJ seems to be out also. Now its the porn star/lawyer angle. Next it will be the lawyer/taxi cab angle. I wonder what it will be after that. Its all getting quite tiresome.
Dude, it might get to the point that they can't prove collusion (conspiracy) to the point of a charge, but this is still being investigated, and no one has given up on it. You are delusional to think so.
You are under the very mistaken impression that Mueller and for some reason main stream media, are just doing everything they can to take down this president. That is ridiculous. The focus on what this crazy President is doing from the media changes from week to week because he keeps bringing the crazy. Mueller is simply looking for the truth. Trump is a lawless President. You should not be defending that.