stop and go wrote:
the stops are the least of my concerns.
You are not paying attention, troll. Your concerns have zero value. Back into your basement, Budding genius.
stop and go wrote:
the stops are the least of my concerns.
You are not paying attention, troll. Your concerns have zero value. Back into your basement, Budding genius.
stop and go wrote:
the stops are the least of my concerns.
i dont know what they're for and im not going to speculate but 60 miles days are tough and making little stops isnt that crazy of a thing to do.
if she were moving at a faster pace the stop/start nature of things may be more detrimental than any benefit gained but at her current speed it hardly makes a difference.
The idiots are trying to imply she's handing off a tracker on this stops. And because they are trying to imply it, in their minds they have the evidence to prove it.
Stops 4 Mimi wrote:
stop and go wrote:the stops are the least of my concerns.
You are not paying attention, troll. Your concerns have zero value. Back into your basement, Budding genius.
+1
More excuses from Team Mimi. They will never stop blaming others for their errors. ... A relay team is the most likely explanation.
stop and go wrote:
the stops are the least of my concerns.
i dont know what they're for and im not going to speculate but 60 miles days are tough and making little stops isnt that crazy of a thing to do.
if she were moving at a faster pace the stop/start nature of things may be more detrimental than any benefit gained but at her current speed it hardly makes a difference.
She's moving at a very fast pace. She's on schedule to be the second fastest crossing ever. I don't understand why you would be more concerned if she were faster.
seems sensible
yeah
You know "read the thread dude" is a fake name?
Results wrote:
stop and go wrote:the stops are the least of my concerns.
i dont know what they're for and im not going to speculate but 60 miles days are tough and making little stops isnt that crazy of a thing to do.
if she were moving at a faster pace the stop/start nature of things may be more detrimental than any benefit gained but at her current speed it hardly makes a difference.
She's moving at a very fast pace. She's on schedule to be the second fastest crossing ever. I don't understand why you would be more concerned if she were faster.
No woman will ever stand a chance of break Marvellous Mimi's "record". No even a younger woman, at her peak. There is no way to beat a 55 year old woman with a bum knee. If Mimi was 30 years old, with a perfect knee, she would beat even Pete K's record. Probably even finish in under 40 days. … Mimi is that Marvellous.
So many mentions of a bus - but no actual evidence of a bus ride?
> Claiming someone came from this website to stalk her and was subsequently arrested. There has been no evidence of this.
Maybe they don't need evidence? Maybe they were nervous to film american police who don't particularly like to be filmed?
boom! someone with some sense!
singled out wrote:
> Claiming someone came from this website to stalk her and was subsequently arrested. There has been no evidence of this.
Maybe they don't need evidence? Maybe they were nervous to film american police who don't particularly like to be filmed?
The police blotter in the city where the "arrest" occurred listed 9 arrests made. None matched the claim by Marvellous Tim. ... And then once caught lying, Tim adjusted the story.
> It is not difficult to pass a tracker back and forth in a crew of ultrarunners. Strava data is useless in such a case.
Really? Have you tried it?
great point
Sure - and that's why they are gathering evidence and uploading strava data
cents wrote:
> It is not difficult to pass a tracker back and forth in a crew of ultrarunners. Strava data is useless in such a case.
Really? Have you tried it?
Ever see a relay team?
Sure. Have you ever seen the strava data from a relay team? See how the caydence changes between runners? Have you done any investigation or just spend the day navel gazing?
Another Mimi excuse wrote:
Stops 4 Mimi wrote:You are not paying attention, troll. Your concerns have zero value. Back into your basement, Budding genius.
+1
More excuses from Team Mimi. They will never stop blaming others for their errors. ... A relay team is the most likely explanation.
im not making excuses. i genuinely dont think its that big a deal.
so in your relay scenario what happens at these stops?
Mimi hands the tracker and her watches to another person and then gets in the support vehicle?
and these changes are made after as little as 40 minutes or as long as 2 hours. thats a lot of runner changes and the whole idea sounds ridiculous.
also, im not that budding genius guy.
Stops 4 Mimi wrote:
More of the odd stop and gos on Mimi's Garmin:
7:17 AM
7:57 AM
Add: 8:57 AM
Add: 9:36 AM
Plus - 11:56 AM
Another: 12:47 PM
And - 1:35 PM
And - 2:27 PM
AND - 3:15 PM
Every 40-50 minutes.
Just need to actually do a bit of work and show that the dots connect or don't. Why all the guesswork and no actual work?