Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

You mean like the faith I should have in the secret FISA judges who allowed themselves to be fooled into using the Clinton fabricated dossier as a reason to surveil Trump's campaign?

Like the faith I should have in the FBI agents who are known to have conspired to take down Trump?

DiscoGary wrote:

Just as I thought.

Disco is experiencing a YUGE 100% meltdown mode.

foo wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Well what did you expect Cohen's attorney to say? Did you expect him to say that the raid was lawful and proper?

Quotes from Stephen Ryan are meaningless.

The decision of the judge who issued the warrant is not.

If you are worried about lawlessness, you place your faith in the judge rather than the defense attorney.

And if you are worried about lawlessness, that last person you would vote for is Trump.

What law did he break?

Mueller's looks quite fine to me! :-D

DiscoGary wrote:

Noticer of dominance wrote:

Having your personal lawyer's office get raided by the FBI typically isn't a good look.

The FBI's reputation isn't so good right now.

DiscoGary wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Well what did you expect Cohen's attorney to say? Did you expect him to say that the raid was lawful and proper?

Quotes from Stephen Ryan are meaningless.

The decision of the judge who issued the warrant is not.

If you are worried about lawlessness, you place your faith in the judge rather than the defense attorney.

You mean like the faith I should have in the secret FISA judges who allowed themselves to be fooled into using the Clinton fabricated dossier as a reason to surveil Trump's campaign?

Like the faith I should have in the FBI agents who are known to have conspired to take down Trump?

DiscoGary wrote:

What law did he [Trump] break?

LAWS, fool.

DiscoGary wrote:

foo wrote:

And if you are worried about lawlessness, that last person you would vote for is Trump.

What law did he break?

laws not law.....

—Donald Trump has a long history of not honoring contracts with construction companies

— Donald Trump has knowingly and intentionally defrauded Trump University students, fleecing them out of thousands of dollars

— He may have illegally coordinated with his SuperPac

— He illegally used corporate resources to pay an employee to write a political speech

— He violated federal law by claiming proceeds from various Trump products would go to charity, although there is no evidence that Trump ever donated the money to charity

— He violated IRS rules by using $12,000 from his charity organization to purchase a Tim Tebow helmet

— He violated election laws by emailing foreign officials to solicit political contributions

— He violated federal laws by offering Ben Carson a job in exchange for his endorsement

— His employees violated a U.S. trade embargo by pursuing commercial activities in Cuba when it was illegal to do so

— He’s run afoul of election laws by using campaign contributions to pay $6 million to his own businesses

— He violated Wisconsin election laws by talking with voters as they stood in line to vote

— He violated New York state education laws for operating a for-profit investment school without the required license

— His foreign policy proposals would violate NATO

— He’s violated copyright law for using copyrighted images without permission

— Many of the proposals he has vowed to pursue as President violate the First, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments of the Constitution

— Trump broke New York state law by lobbying to prevent an Indian casino from opening in the Catskills

— His vow to use torture on suspected terrorists would violate the Geneva conventions. He would be committing war crimes.

— He broke anti-discrimination laws to keep a mob boss gambling at one of his casinos

— He violated immigration laws by misrepresenting his company on work-visa applications

Only a few.

I might add the following: Given that the judge authorized a no knock raid for the FBI, that means they had reason to believe the people in question would have destroyed evidence if they caught wind of this.

DiscoGary wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

Well what did you expect Cohen's attorney to say? Did you expect him to say that the raid was lawful and proper?

Quotes from Stephen Ryan are meaningless.

The decision of the judge who issued the warrant is not.

If you are worried about lawlessness, you place your faith in the judge rather than the defense attorney.

You mean like the faith I should have in the secret FISA judges who allowed themselves to be fooled into using the Clinton fabricated dossier as a reason to surveil Trump's campaign?

Like the faith I should have in the FBI agents who are known to have conspired to take down Trump?

Both unsubstantiated.

Remember the time when the FBI raided the office of the personal lawyer of Barack H Obama?

You don't? Well neither do I.

Bruhahahahahahahahahaha!

DiscoInferno wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Just as I thought.

Disco is experiencing a YUGE 100% meltdown mode.

Everyone should be thinking about what might happen if Trump is run out of office, but no one is talking about it. What will happen when 50% of the country knows that they will never ever again be represented in government because whoever they elect will be run out of town on bogus charges? Responsible people should be talking about that right now. The ONLY Democrat in the country who's even coming close is Alan Dershowitz.

If liberals had something called "empathy" they would understand what I'm talking about and put a stop to this. They are not stopping it so I conclude they have to empathy.

This is dangerous. This should stop now.

Noticer of dominance wrote:

I might add the following: Given that the judge authorized a no knock raid for the FBI, that means they had reason to believe the people in question would have destroyed evidence if they caught wind of this.

Because Trump has a history of destroying evidence . . .

brotown wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

You mean like the faith I should have in the secret FISA judges who allowed themselves to be fooled into using the Clinton fabricated dossier as a reason to surveil Trump's campaign?

Like the faith I should have in the FBI agents who are known to have conspired to take down Trump?

Both unsubstantiated.

In the maze maybe, but they are well known in the real world.

DiscoGary wrote:

foo wrote:

And if you are worried about lawlessness, that last person you would vote for is Trump.

What law did he break?

Conspiracy against the United States

Material Support of Enemies of the US

Money laundering

Various Campaign Finance laws

Solicitation

Lewd acts with a minor

Perjury

Liable

Slander

Various workplace harassment and safety laws

Immigration laws (Melania, 90% of his staff at various hotels)

Foreign emolument clause of the US Constitution

Of course, the investigation is still on going so there will probably be more. Hey, at least he’s being held accountable.

Noticer of dominance wrote:

I might add the following: Given that the judge authorized a no knock raid for the FBI, that means they had reason to believe the people in question would have destroyed evidence if they caught wind of this.

I assume any evidence that could be found in a raid would have been destroyed long ago.

I can't imagine anything useful to be found.

DiscoGary wrote:

DiscoInferno wrote:

Disco is experiencing a YUGE 100% meltdown mode.

Everyone should be thinking about what might happen if Trump is run out of office, but no one is talking about it. What will happen when 50% of the country knows that they will never ever again be represented in government because whoever they elect will be run out of town on bogus charges? Responsible people should be talking about that right now. The ONLY Democrat in the country who's even coming close is Alan Dershowitz.

If liberals had something called "empathy" they would understand what I'm talking about and put a stop to this. They are not stopping it so I conclude they have to empathy.

This is dangerous. This should stop now.

Luckily, most of the people that voted for him will realize that Trump did not represent them. They will realize they were screwed over by a glorified used-car salesman who pretended to possess their values, but didn't.

Oh, a bunch actually.... wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

What law did he break?

Conspiracy against the United States

Material Support of Enemies of the US

Money laundering

Various Campaign Finance laws

Solicitation

Lewd acts with a minor

Perjury

Liable

Slander

Various workplace harassment and safety laws

Immigration laws (Melania, 90% of his staff at various hotels)

Foreign emolument clause of the US Constitution

Of course, the investigation is still on going so there will probably be more. Hey, at least he’s being held accountable.

We're talking about Trump here, not Bill and Hillary Clinton.

DiscoGary wrote:

brotown wrote:

Both unsubstantiated.

In the maze maybe, but they are well known in the real world.

No sir.

Also your rat maze analogy is hypocritical, but I'm guessing that you can't see that because, you know, maze stuff.

DiscoGary wrote:

Everyone should be thinking about what might happen if Trump is run out of office, but no one is talking about it. What will happen when 50% of the country knows that they will never ever again be represented in government.

LOL ... try 20% --diehard Trumpers. Yet, you are 100% okay with 50% of the country not being represented --using you bogus 50%. That is perfectly acceptable. You have ZERO empathy; just like Trump.

Please get together with YOUR 20% of the Trumpers and move in mass to the reddest states (the Dakotas). Vote only for Trumpers. Then have then vote to succeed from the US. Then elect Trump as your deer ruler. Then build a 50-foot wall around yourselves that has no door to get in, or to escape. Ban airports --no one can enter, or leave; NO ONE. Best of luck.