Democrats are on the highway to the danger zone.
-
14
-
trump2028 ~\' wrote:
Trump does it out in the open. He's one of the world's bust businessmen and probably the most prominent person in the world. Any crypto project he creates will have a TON of grassroots enthusiasm.
So Presidential corruption is okay if it’s out in the open?
Nobody would be dumping billions into Trumps crypto if he lost the election and had no Presidential authority. They aren’t dumping money because Trump is a savvy businessman. They are buying what they want by lining Trump family pockets.
Kushner got his 2 billion immediately after Trump left office. Trump isn’t waiting.
70 -
Pretty cool to have a president with a great sense of humor.
Trump posts AI image of himself as Pope amid Vatican's search for new pontiff35 -
trump2028 ~\' wrote:
A Signal alert!
03 -
cowboy corkyyyyy wrote:
Pretty cool to have a president with a great sense of humor.
Trump posts AI image of himself as Pope amid Vatican's search for new pontiffI know. Catholics need to get a couple of drinks and chill out. Why are Catholics always spazzing out about their religion? Very Karen-like with their perpetual victim mentality.
40 -
05
-
bacon and pineapple wrote:
Shoko Asahara wrote:
That was from the Supreme Court. Not "a judge". It's like you have no f*cking clue what you're talking about.
OK, an Associate Justice, if we are going to get technical.
Whatever.
That was Justice Stevens, who though nominated by a Republican president, turned out to be a liberal.
His law clerks probably wrote most of the opinion anyway.
It was a unanimous decision.
70 -
bacon and pineapple wrote:
Shoko Asahara wrote:
No degree from Harvard for me, but I'm beginning to suspect your education ended somewhere around the 6th grade from some backwoods grade school... probably somewhere in a hick-infested red state.
My degree is from a D2 school in a blue state.
D2 - isn’t that the division for people that aren’t athletic or smart?
50 -
Shoko Asahara wrote:
bacon and pineapple wrote:
OK, an Associate Justice, if we are going to get technical.
Whatever.
That was Justice Stevens, who though nominated by a Republican president, turned out to be a liberal.
His law clerks probably wrote most of the opinion anyway.
It was a unanimous decision.
Yes, it was.
A unanimous decision to draw a clear line of demarcation between citizens and non-citizens.
04 -
D2 = Dumb and Dumber wrote:
bacon and pineapple wrote:
My degree is from a D2 school in a blue state.
D2 - isn’t that the division for people that aren’t athletic or smart?
D2 schools teach practical knowledge.
03 -
Shoko Asahara wrote:
bacon and pineapple wrote:
OK, an Associate Justice, if we are going to get technical.
Whatever.
That was Justice Stevens, who though nominated by a Republican president, turned out to be a liberal.
His law clerks probably wrote most of the opinion anyway.
It was a unanimous decision.
I don't think what Trump did is any worse than a lot of the anti-Catholic jokes that Protestants have been telling for years ("Does the pope wear a funny hat?" Does the pope sh!t in the woods?", etc.). I'm just saying.
40 -
El Runkin wrote:
Shoko Asahara wrote:
It was a unanimous decision.
I don't think what Trump did is any worse than a lot of the anti-Catholic jokes that Protestants have been telling for years ("Does the pope wear a funny hat?" Does the pope sh!t in the woods?", etc.). I'm just saying.
Donnie from Queens is from the same place Archie Bunker came from, and from the same easy bigotry milieu
40 -
bacon and pineapple wrote:
Shoko Asahara wrote:
Responding to one of your own incorrect posts with a second even dumber incorrect post does not magically make the first post correct.
There is nothing incorrect in either of my posts.
You are too stupid to understand the clear language of the Constitution.
You love to take words out of context.
It is impossible to separate "Citizens of the United States" from "at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution",
The whole point of that language was to grandfather in current U.S. citizens who were not natural born U.S. citizens.
As a student of history, I don't usually call people stupid.
My role is to educate, as I have done here; and it is my privilege to have provided greater elucidation concerning this topic.
However, it is you who called me stupid first; and you doubled down after you were proven to be wrong.
That is simply dumb, and I will call a spade a spade.
Let me try again by asking you a very simple question. Does the 5th Amendment protect all people in the United States from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law? Or does the 5th Amendment only protect US citizens from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law?
This post was edited 1 minute after it was posted. Reason provided: Fixed erroneous capitalization, because I'm not Trump.40 -
All these dumb and erroneous left-wing takes within this thread are the result of liberal indoctrination at our secondary educational institutions and higher schools of learning over the past 45 years.
Time to dismantle the Department of Indoctrination.
010 -
This quoted post has been removed.
Another one
Why am I not surprised?
50 -
agip wrote:
Donnie from Queens is from the same place Archie Bunker came from, and from the same easy bigotry milieu
The Whites had to live somewhere.
Jews had Brooklyn. Blacks had Harlem. Puerto Ricans had the Bronx.
Queens is looking rather ethnic today.
06 -
Shoko Asahara wrote:
bacon and pineapple wrote:
There is nothing incorrect in either of my posts.
You are too stupid to understand the clear language of the Constitution.
You love to take words out of context.
It is impossible to separate "Citizens of the United States" from "at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution",
The whole point of that language was to grandfather in current U.S. citizens who were not natural born U.S. citizens.
As a student of history, I don't usually call people stupid.
My role is to educate, as I have done here; and it is my privilege to have provided greater elucidation concerning this topic.
However, it is you who called me stupid first; and you doubled down after you were proven to be wrong.
That is simply dumb, and I will call a spade a spade.
Let me try again by asking you a very simple question. Does the 5th Amendment protect all people in the United States from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law? Or does the 5th Amendment only protect US citizens from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law?
My God, in all of this time just today, you could have just read the Constitution instead of making a fool of yourself all day.
Who does the very first word of the Constitution represent? that is the only question that needs an answer. Who is the “We”?
13 -
cowboy corkyyyyy wrote:
Pretty cool to have a president with a great sense of humor.
Trump posts AI image of himself as Pope amid Vatican's search for new pontiffExactly. Especially as it makes liberals cry.
04 -
agip wrote:
Donnie from Queens is from the same place Archie Bunker came from, and from the same easy bigotry milieu
03 -
Noyankee wrote:
Shoko Asahara wrote:
Let me try again by asking you a very simple question. Does the 5th Amendment protect all people in the United States from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law? Or does the 5th Amendment only protect US citizens from deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process of law?
My God, in all of this time just today, you could have just read the Constitution instead of making a fool of yourself all day.
Who does the very first word of the Constitution represent? that is the only question that needs an answer. Who is the “We”?
It’s “the people” - as in all the people in the United States. Glad we could clear that up. Still waiting for you to post any legal precedent that the 5th amendment doesn’t apply to aliens.
20
What People Are Talking About On LetsRun
No top threads at the moment. Check back soon.