Breaking: FBI raiding Mar a Lardo!

Commode flusher wrote:

carmine9 wrote:

Weisslberg ain't going to jail.

Have you not been paying attention?

No, I haven't been paying attention much. I spent much of the last week boozing it up in Ciudad Juarez. I think I saw J. Christ in an albondiga.

But you have been paying attention. You are always on top of this stuff. And, armed with your knowledge of the situation, you have now doubled down on your prediction that Weisselberg will not be going to jail or prison or be serving any term of incarceration. We can only conclude you have agreed (again) to the bet/wager -- you will self-ban yourself permanently if Weisselberg is incarcerated.

We are going to hold you to this agreement, Carmine9. A deal is a deal. This is America. The art of the deal.

GraceKelly wrote:

Flagpole wrote:

I am dead serious here...how can you possibly defend this action by Trump? No deflecting...you can't anyway, because there has NEVER been a President or former President who has done anything remotely approaching this.

The only response you are going to get is "Hillary's emails" and "Obama did it too, but much worse." They believe it is justified because their twitter feed says others did it too without consequence. The kind of logic that will no doubt Make America Great Again.

carmine9 wrote:

GraceKelly wrote:

The only response you are going to get is "Hillary's emails" and "Obama did it too, but much worse." They believe it is justified because their twitter feed says others did it too without consequence. The kind of logic that will no doubt Make America Great Again.

Bush and Obama lied us into half a dozen wars for God's sakes.

What is it you think Trump did?

carmine9 wrote:

Commode flusher wrote:

No, I haven't been paying attention much. I spent much of the last week boozing it up in Ciudad Juarez. I think I saw J. Christ in an albondiga.

But you have been paying attention. You are always on top of this stuff. And, armed with your knowledge of the situation, you have now doubled down on your prediction that Weisselberg will not be going to jail or prison or be serving any term of incarceration. We can only conclude you have agreed (again) to the bet/wager -- you will self-ban yourself permanently if Weisselberg is incarcerated.

We are going to hold you to this agreement, Carmine9. A deal is a deal. This is America. The art of the deal.

What did I agree to?

Nothing.

You guys are awfully stupid

coach wrote:

Ivanka is the rat and will plea. She'll state that she is at fault and that pops had no idea. But since she is a member of the protected class she has nothing to worry about, she won't go to jail.

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:

Timothy Foyle wrote:

Come on, carmine, you can do it. Don't be ashamed of who you are.

Would you be honest enough to admit that the people on Epstein's client list are being protected?

Heartlesss wrote:

LOL- more outlets now admitting the raid was, in fact, all about trying to get the RussiaGate Hoax documents back.

No wonder Trump still hasn’t zero (0) indictments against him.

Cant blame the FBI though. Such an embarrassing hoax attempt. Should’ve used those resources to- I don’t know- stop one of the school shooters “that were on our radar.”

Video:youtu.be/EXj_pW-Hegs

Heartlesss wrote:

LOL- more outlets now admitting the raid was, in fact, all about trying to get the RussiaGate Hoax documents back.

No wonder Trump still hasn’t zero (0) indictments against him.

Cant blame the FBI though. Such an embarrassing hoax attempt. Should’ve used those resources to- I don’t know- stop one of the school shooters “that were on our radar.”

Video:youtu.be/EXj_pW-Hegs

Heartlesss wrote:

LOL- more outlets now admitting the raid was, in fact, all about trying to get the RussiaGate Hoax documents back.

No wonder Trump still hasn’t zero (0) indictments against him.

Cant blame the FBI though. Such an embarrassing hoax attempt. Should’ve used those resources to- I don’t know- stop one of the school shooters “that were on our radar.”

Video:youtu.be/EXj_pW-Hegs

Timothy Foyle wrote:

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:

Would you be honest enough to admit that the people on Epstein's client list are being protected?

Would you be stup!d enough to think that this is the "protected group" that carmine is referring to?

Commode flusher wrote:

carmine9 wrote:

What did I agree to?

Nothing.

You guys are awfully stupid

You agreed to self-ban yourself permanently if Weisselberg is incarcerated (you have announced boldly and unequivocally that he will not be incarcerated because he is a member of the protected class). You had so much faith in your statements and predictions that you agreed to self-ban permanently if for some crazy reason, Weisselberg were to escape incarceration.

Commode flusher wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

So how does that address the claim by Civil Liberties International that there is "a visible deterioration of democracy in the US"? (They don't appear at all concerned about NZ, which ranks far above the US as a functioning democracy at second in the world). Your deflection never ends. You are as big a loser as "adult" - and that's saying something.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/122154103/called-the-nword-by-teachers-students-describe-racism-at-new-zealand-schools

TheAdultInTheRoom wrote:

Armstronglivs wrote:

So how does that address the claim by Civil Liberties International that there is "a visible deterioration of democracy in the US"? (They don't appear at all concerned about NZ, which ranks far above the US as a functioning democracy at second in the world). Your deflection never ends. You are as big a loser as "adult" - and that's saying something.

You don't even have free speech in NZ or many of countries ahead of the US on your idiotic list.

Having other stupid people agree with you just means your stupidity isn't rare. It doesn't validate your opinions.

Commode flusher wrote:

carmine9 wrote:

Weisslberg ain't going to jail.

Have you not been paying attention?

No, I haven't been paying attention much. I spent much of the last week boozing it up in Ciudad Juarez. I think I saw J. Christ in an albondiga.

But you have been paying attention. You are always on top of this stuff. And, armed with your knowledge of the situation, you have now doubled down on your prediction that Weisselberg will not be going to jail or prison or be serving any term of incarceration. We can only conclude you have agreed (again) to the bet/wager -- you will self-ban yourself permanently if Weisselberg is incarcerated.

We are going to hold you to this agreement, Carmine9. A deal is a deal. This is America. The art of the deal.

Armstronglivs wrote:

Commode flusher wrote:

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/122154103/called-the-nword-by-teachers-students-describe-racism-at-new-zealand-schools

Second amongst the world's democracies and 14 places above a declining US, which has entered the company of the likes of Chile. You have persuaded me that you are really "adult". A witless deflector.

kibitzer wrote:

Commode flusher wrote:

You agreed to self-ban yourself permanently if Weisselberg is incarcerated (you have announced boldly and unequivocally that he will not be incarcerated because he is a member of the protected class). You had so much faith in your statements and predictions that you agreed to self-ban permanently if for some crazy reason, Weisselberg were to escape incarceration.

Well, I think C9 is a noxious troll, but TBF I don't recall that s/he ever actually agreed to that. You just *wanted* it to be true . . . so it had to be!

That's usually the Trumpistas' MO. You sure you're not one?

Besides, C9 would just change monikers (again) and be back (again).