its_baddude wrote:
Fats, you have not posted a single fact. . . .
its_baddude wrote:
I read the filing. He (Gates) was in communication with a former Russian Intelligence Officer who worked for Manaford. . . .
WTF?
its_baddude wrote:
Fats, you have not posted a single fact. . . .
its_baddude wrote:
I read the filing. He (Gates) was in communication with a former Russian Intelligence Officer who worked for Manaford. . . .
WTF?
its_baddude wrote:
Correct, the libs come here a post a link to back their claim. The link is usually from a biased source. You point that out and they call you dumb. Now post a link from a conservative study, the call you stupid.
They don't get it. Please libs, not only post a link, but post why you think the link is correct. The links libs post are usually an analysis of data. Don't freak out when conservative don't believe anything you post.
BTW, this is why I rarely post links at all. I assume we all know how to use Google. If you dispute some fact I post then Google it yourself. Go to a news source you trust and decide for yourself if it's true.
Also, I encourage everyone to read news from sites that span the political spectrum. Question everything. When you do that, it becomes pretty easy to spot who is playing it straight and who is just spinning and/or lying.
Flagpole wrote:
nuthing--burger wrote:
I'm 28 and sick of you whining losers complaining over and over, so deal with it. Hell, you're almost twice my age, what makes you so smart? Barrack Obama was not the worst President, but he LIED big time and you libs can't admit it, so deal with or give up.
Tip: If you are going to ask someone what makes them so smart, it would behoove you not to misspell the name of our 44th President.
You're welcome.
Tip: You have more typos than anyone on this thread. Is that what you're judging posters on now? If you don't have anything enlightening to say, just keep quiet.
Barrrrrack Obummmmer wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Tip: If you are going to ask someone what makes them so smart, it would behoove you not to misspell the name of our 44th President.
You're welcome.
Tip: You have more typos than anyone on this thread. Is that what you're judging posters on now? If you don't have anything enlightening to say, just keep quiet.
another reason why flagpole has no credibility, nor do his sources. 2020!
Lefty Louie wrote:
Noticer of dominance wrote:
Hillary was investigated by a Republican congress, some of whom have leading roles in the Trump administration, nine times and they found nothing. Thank you, lean one, for dominating these right wing morons.
Flagpole, please stop with this alter-ego. I say this respectfully and as someone who appreciates most of your posts.
You don't even have to admit that you are 'Nod' (we all already know this). Just stop posting under this 'Nod' handle.
Please.
Thanks in advance.
Dude, "noticer of dominance" is not me. Maybe you are just trolling me, but either way, she is not me. That would be a ban-able offense for me to come on here and categorically deny if it were true. Go to the admins and ask them to investigate if you wish. I am not that person.
Also, it should not come as a surprise to the readers here at Letsrun that someone (she is not the first and will not be the last) would compliment my posts. I make great points. I don't use sophomoric language, and I write better than just about all of you. When people find out that I have HUGE biceps and am one of the best 50 piano players in the world, then they are intrigued on top of that.
Fat hurts wrote:
its_baddude wrote:
Fats, you have not posted a single fact. There is no collusion. Collusion is not even a crime. Collusion is not well defined. Manafort and Gates were not indited for collusion. Please bring on the truth. Manaford and Gates did not collude with Russian intelligence. According to the documents you put forth, Manaford and Gates talked to a Former GRU officer. What the hell are you talking about?
I guess I have to spell it out (again) because you are (still) in such denial.
Manafort was Trump's campaign chairman. Gates was Trump's deputy campaign chairman. Both had multiple meetings with Russian Intelligence during the campaign.
Unless you think they were just discussing the weather, it reeks of conspiracy.
Gates is cooperating with Mueller. Gates has told Mueller exactly what they talked about and what they did with Russian Intelligence.
Gates must have told Mueller something very damning to win his sweet plea deal.
A few additional facts:
* GRU is roughly equal to the Soviet era KGB.
* There is no such thing as "Former GRU". Once you are in, you are in for life.
* I have seen no post or news report anywhere that gives an innocent explanation for these confirmed meetings between Manafort, Gates, and the GRU.
* It's collusion
* It's conspiracy
Gonna have to give credit where credit is due, and if conspiracy is proven and successfully charged, YOU, Fat Hurts, get to claim you were the first to call it. I am still a little conservative with that, so while I definitely believe we have collusion (conspiracy), I won't call it just yet simply because it is so hard to prove, and just so the Trumpers don't chime in here, IF Mueller never levels that charge, I will accept that there was no collusion.
All that said...
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Flagpole wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I guess I have to spell it out (again) because you are (still) in such denial.
Manafort was Trump's campaign chairman. Gates was Trump's deputy campaign chairman. Both had multiple meetings with Russian Intelligence during the campaign.
Unless you think they were just discussing the weather, it reeks of conspiracy.
Gates is cooperating with Mueller. Gates has told Mueller exactly what they talked about and what they did with Russian Intelligence.
Gates must have told Mueller something very damning to win his sweet plea deal.
A few additional facts:
* GRU is roughly equal to the Soviet era KGB.
* There is no such thing as "Former GRU". Once you are in, you are in for life.
* I have seen no post or news report anywhere that gives an innocent explanation for these confirmed meetings between Manafort, Gates, and the GRU.
* It's collusion
* It's conspiracy
Gonna have to give credit where credit is due, and if conspiracy is proven and successfully charged, YOU, Fat Hurts, get to claim you were the first to call it. I am still a little conservative with that, so while I definitely believe we have collusion (conspiracy), I won't call it just yet simply because it is so hard to prove, and just so the Trumpers don't chime in here, IF Mueller never levels that charge, I will accept that there was no collusion.
All that said...
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
No, neither of you get credit for anything, except in your own minds. Your arrogance and lack of substance is what makes people laugh at you on this thread. You repeat what you read and pawn it off as your own to play the part of being smart, which you are not.
I teach at a University and I happen to run. It's rare to see such a braggart with nothing original to offer. I think I've had one student like you in the last 8 years, just one. Eventually he embarrassed himself to the point that he didn't want to talk in class anymore.
I was on here in the first 50 pages of this thread, and you haven't changed. I have no idea how many handles you go by and I don't care as that's fair game on this site...but agreeing with yourself is beyond comical.
Trump will be President this Summer and I'd bet dimes to dollars you'll still be on here with your last 2 sentences of every post being the same. Your close now, but by then you'll be just like the student that I spoke of. Cry wolf one too many times and...
Obama was not honest with the American people and did so to get elected. Hillary and Bill were crooks (take off your rose colored glasses and open your eyes). You and your incessant complaining will solve nothing.
Come next Fall, Trump will still be the President and you'll be repeating the same two lines in hopes of boasting one day to a running forum that "I was right, I was right"...but that's not going to happen.
I can only assume you're a runner, right? So why don't you go for a run and clear the cobwebs from the space in your Cerebrum.
In addition, I hope there are a dozen typos, as I've read that it drives you to madness.
Grow up, tame your over-inflamed ego and realize that your thoughts aren't universal.
I doubt you'll take my advice, but time should take care of that.
I'll check back in by September and not a day before. Dimes to dollars says you'll be wrong, but will you admit it? Doubtful.
it's over-inflated, but over-inflamed still works;)
Unv. Prof wrote:
Grow up, tame your over-inflamed ego and realize that your thoughts aren't universal.
So cries the small-minded boy with a over-inflamed ego. And who supports the world's #1 over-inflamed ego, tRump.
non-Flagpole wrote:
it's over-inflated, but over-inflamed still works;)
Uni Prof failed HS.
How do you know what Gates told Muller? How do you know why Gates made a plea deal? What confirmed meetings? Define meeting. The rest of your post is innuendo, straight out CNN?
Fat hurts wrote:
its_baddude wrote:
Fats, you have not posted a single fact. There is no collusion. Collusion is not even a crime. Collusion is not well defined. Manafort and Gates were not indited for collusion. Please bring on the truth. Manaford and Gates did not collude with Russian intelligence. According to the documents you put forth, Manaford and Gates talked to a Former GRU officer. What the hell are you talking about?
I guess I have to spell it out (again) because you are (still) in such denial.
Manafort was Trump's campaign chairman. Gates was Trump's deputy campaign chairman. Both had multiple meetings with Russian Intelligence during the campaign.
Unless you think they were just discussing the weather, it reeks of conspiracy.
Gates is cooperating with Mueller. Gates has told Mueller exactly what they talked about and what they did with Russian Intelligence.
Gates must have told Mueller something very damning to win his sweet plea deal.
A few additional facts:
* GRU is roughly equal to the Soviet era KGB.
* There is no such thing as "Former GRU". Once you are in, you are in for life.
* I have seen no post or news report anywhere that gives an innocent explanation for these confirmed meetings between Manafort, Gates, and the GRU.
* It's collusion
* It's conspiracy
He's a HS dropout wrote:
non-Flagpole wrote:
it's over-inflated, but over-inflamed still works;)
Uni Prof failed HS.
Sorry, that was wrong. I'm going to start being a better person (hell, I'm a high school dropout). Nice post and yes, flagpole is a bit arrogant with nothing to back it up.
I'm not a real professor like the other poster. I'm just highly insecure and post troll like stuff to make myself feel better. You have my sincere apologies for being a jealous a$$. Nice post on the flagpole topic, he's got a big ego indeed.
Oops. It looks like Trump's attempt to offer pardons to get people not to testify against him is considered bribery. In other words, he cannot offer pardons for something that someone has not been convicted of. ... Such a YUGE Oops.
Early Pardons wrote:
Oops. It looks like Trump's attempt to offer pardons to get people not to testify against him is considered bribery. In other words, he cannot offer pardons for something that someone has not been convicted of. ... Such a YUGE Oops.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/why-robert-mueller-could-be-considering-bribery-charges/2018/03/29/2e4a60cc-336a-11e8-94fa-32d48460b955_story.html
Oops, like Obama;)
Easy Pardons wrote:
Oops, like Obama;)
^Fake news,
PS. You neglected to provide a Breitbart/Fox News link(s).
Unv. Prof wrote:
In addition, I hope there are a dozen typos, as I've read that it drives you to madness.
Grow up, tame your over-inflamed ego and realize that your thoughts aren't universal.
I doubt you'll take my advice, but time should take care of that.
I'll check back in by September and not a day before. Dimes to dollars says you'll be wrong, but will you admit it? Doubtful.
1) If I thought my thoughts were universal, I wouldn't need to express them, eh? I hope you don't teach any reasoning classes at your school.
2) Having an opinion that is different from yours offers no evidence that I need to "grow up". What a weird thing to say.
3) Not sure why you believe that September is a magical time. I have never said Trump would be gone by a certain time, so come back in September if you wish, but only a complete exoneration of Trump by Mueller at that time would have me be wrong. If Mueller is still investigating and no charges have yet been filed, that won't make me wrong. I'm in this until the end result, brother.
4) Of course I will admit that I was wrong if I indeed am found out to be. I ALWAYS do that when I am wrong. I still maintain today that I was wrong about the 2016 election. That could change if there is collusion with Russia by Trump or his staff to get him elected, but for now I remain wrong about that. You don't read here enough apparently if you think I would not admit to being wrong.
So, it's probably a good idea if you stay away until September. Maybe you can use that time to work on making a good point.
In case you didn't know...
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
its_baddude wrote:
How do you know what Gates told Muller? How do you know why Gates made a plea deal? What confirmed meetings? Define meeting. The rest of your post is innuendo, straight out CNN?
I am pretty sure Gates didn't tell Muller anything.
He's a HS dropout wrote:
...flagpole is a bit arrogant with nothing to back it up.
Not sure how I am arrogant either with or without anything to back it up.
I am making a prediction that Mueller will eventually charge Trump with something that will end him. Lots of smoke and a bit of evidence to make that a reasonable prediction.
Now it is POSSIBLE that you believe I am arrogant based on some things I have said, but those things would back up being a bit arrogant. Here are some of those things:
1) I have HUGE biceps.
2) My wife is beautiful and a bonafide genius.
3) Both of my children are gifted athletically and intellectually.
4) I am one of the best 50 piano players in the world.
5) I mow the front yard with my shirt off. I used to mow the backyard that way too, but the neighbor lady was staring at me through her bedroom window with an open robe, and I didn't want to be a part of that, so shirt stays on in the backyard now.
6) I haven't quite figured out how this works, but about every 12 times or so that I snap my fingers, a small plate of gold appears on the table before me.
So, perhaps arrogant because of those things, but, I never said I was perfect.