Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
Good morning! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine am?
its_baddude wrote:
I read the filing. He was in communication with a former Russian Intelligence Officer who worked for Manaford. No where does it say he was a spy. Still, not clear what any of this has to do with Trump. Please assert your dominance.
If your best counterpoint is to argue the semantic difference between "Russian Intelligence Officer" and "spy", you've already been dominated.
Monkeys typing wrote:
its_baddude wrote:
I read the filing. He was in communication with a former Russian Intelligence Officer who worked for Manaford. No where does it say he was a spy. Still, not clear what any of this has to do with Trump. Please assert your dominance.
If your best counterpoint is to argue the semantic difference between "Russian Intelligence Officer" and "spy", you've already been dominated.
Correct.
Come on folks. It's collusion. It's conspiracy. I've yet to see anyone (except its_baddude) give another explanation of the facts at hand.
I'm surprised that its_baddude even tried. Nobody else has made the attempt. I haven't seen any other Trumper anywhere try to argue that there is an innocent explanation for this.
Fat hurts wrote:
Monkeys typing wrote:
If your best counterpoint is to argue the semantic difference between "Russian Intelligence Officer" and "spy", you've already been dominated.
Correct.
Come on folks. It's collusion. It's conspiracy. I've yet to see anyone (except its_baddude) give another explanation of the facts at hand.
I'm surprised that its_baddude even tried. Nobody else has made the attempt. I haven't seen any other Trumper anywhere try to argue that there is an innocent explanation for this.
No it's not.
Come on folks, Hillary lied over and over, but they've yet to convict her on those lies, remember?
Soon she'll be in deep "Do Do" and you'll say what?
Your only fall back is that she was investigated and found not guilty. But, was she guilty? The answer is obvious, but LL and the Gang don't acknowledge that.
Obama lied dozens of times about his campaign promises (do your own unbiased research).
Snope is right is they print what you want. If they print the opposite, they're wrong. That I find hilarious.
So then, after how many months have you and Gagpole regurgitated crap that you found on the internet, pawned it off as your own, then claimed Donald Trump would be gone? Again, how many months? It's April 1st on Sunday then May 1st will come, etc...
You guys think you're so intelligent that you've been telling a small number of people on a silly running forum that he's done and you said it first...which is utterly and embarrassingly laughable.
It shows your huge insecurities as you yearn for the approval of others. Neither of you clowns are right on anything but what you've read which isn't always fact.
its_baddude has been kicking your butt over and over and over, but you keep grasping to Mueller is coming, ect...
they are far leftist and won't agree to anything that the right says. let them cry some more, trump won and they'll spend many precious years complaining! think about it, if they had lives, real lives, would they be on here all the time? LL, Fatty and Fattypole have no lives. look how many times they post in a day. who are they trying to convince? all are in their 50's and have letsrun as their main artery.
Fat hurts wrote:
Monkeys typing wrote:
If your best counterpoint is to argue the semantic difference between "Russian Intelligence Officer" and "spy", you've already been dominated.
Correct.
Come on folks. It's collusion. It's conspiracy. I've yet to see anyone (except its_baddude) give another explanation of the facts at hand.
I'm surprised that its_baddude even tried. Nobody else has made the attempt. I haven't seen any other Trumper anywhere try to argue that there is an innocent explanation for this.
Because people don't have to explain innocence. You are innocent until proven guilty.
The burden of proof is on the accuser. It becomes an even bigger burden when, after 1.5 years, you can't even define what you're accusing the person of. LOL.
Here ya go, from an unbiased source as well. Ya, Barack was soooooooo honest, LOL! I never saw any of you complaining ONCE during his 8 years, not once.
The publication reports that so far, Donald Trump has kept 8.8% of his campaign promises. He has compromised on 6.9% of his promises. The publication characterizes 32.4% of his promises as “stalled.” A further 45.1% remain “in the works.” And so far, Trump has definitively broken 6.9% of his campaign promises. Politifact reports that during his presidency, Obama kept 48.4% of his promises. He compromised on 27.4% of them. And he broke 24.2% of them — a percentage that we’ll have to wait to see if Donald Trump will improve upon.
Flagpole wrote:
2) "Our side"? MY SIDE is the side of truth and justice. Doesn't matter to me whatsoever if some crooked Democrats get caught breaking the law. The fact is that TRUMP will be caught breaking the law, and what he has done will be proven to be MUCH worse than anything some Democrats have done. This has nothing to do with me believing that Republicans are evil and Democrats are not. This has to do with the fact that TRUMP is amoral and criminal beyond anything we have ever seen in Federal US politics.
Do know...
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Flagpole, I present to you a reasonable counter :
Many here, including yourself, are operating under the assumption that Trump is guilty of collusion when in fact that is not a forgone conclusion. You are a mostly reasonable man who seems to respect due process and given the nature of Mueller's stellar reputation I think it's safe to say that we can trust his investigation team to uncover any and all truths related to the matter of collusion and the 2016 election. In the meantime, allegations in regards to conspiracy among Russia, the Gates - Manafort duo, and the president are circumstantial (although the current direction of the investigation and the evidence uncovered thus far does not seem to bode well for the president). As such, as a man on the side of truth and justice, I propose an alternate sign off :
Mueller is currently investigating whether or not the president colluded with Russians and is following all leads to conduct as thorough of an investigation as possible.
If such evidence of collusion is is found (and it does currently seem to be indicative of such), then the clown will be done.
No, it's not indicative of such. We all thought the same thing with Clinton, and she skated after lying over and over under oath.
Flagpole is far from smart. He's just wants to rant and be heard, yet his substance is lacking. Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton, live with it. As dozens of others have said, he's been on here for how many months whining? Fall will come and he'll be saying Trump got off easy and should have been thrown out. Bookmark my post, I guarantee you he'll still be President. Next time put in a better candidate than Clinton, she lied more than Obama!
longbaugh sundance wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Correct.
Come on folks. It's collusion. It's conspiracy. I've yet to see anyone (except its_baddude) give another explanation of the facts at hand.
I'm surprised that its_baddude even tried. Nobody else has made the attempt. I haven't seen any other Trumper anywhere try to argue that there is an innocent explanation for this.
No it's not.
Come on folks, Hillary lied over and over, but they've yet to convict her on those lies, remember?
Soon she'll be in deep "Do Do" and you'll say what?
Your only fall back is that she was investigated and found not guilty. But, was she guilty? The answer is obvious, but LL and the Gang don't acknowledge that.
Obama lied dozens of times about his campaign promises (do your own unbiased research).
Snope is right is they print what you want. If they print the opposite, they're wrong. That I find hilarious.
So then, after how many months have you and Gagpole regurgitated crap that you found on the internet, pawned it off as your own, then claimed Donald Trump would be gone? Again, how many months? It's April 1st on Sunday then May 1st will come, etc...
You guys think you're so intelligent that you've been telling a small number of people on a silly running forum that he's done and you said it first...which is utterly and embarrassingly laughable.
It shows your huge insecurities as you yearn for the approval of others. Neither of you clowns are right on anything but what you've read which isn't always fact.
its_baddude has been kicking your butt over and over and over, but you keep grasping to Mueller is coming, ect...
So your only explanation is, "What about Hillary?".
You can't argue the facts. The facts are that Trump's campaign chair and deputy campaign chair colluded with Russian Intelligence. We know that now. The meetings are documented.
It's collusion.
It's conspiracy.
These facts will be argued in court. If Trumpers can't even dream up one innocent explanation of the facts it will surely be an open and shut case for Mueller.
Use ya head bruh wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
Correct.
Come on folks. It's collusion. It's conspiracy. I've yet to see anyone (except its_baddude) give another explanation of the facts at hand.
I'm surprised that its_baddude even tried. Nobody else has made the attempt. I haven't seen any other Trumper anywhere try to argue that there is an innocent explanation for this.
Because people don't have to explain innocence. You are innocent until proven guilty.
The burden of proof is on the accuser. It becomes an even bigger burden when, after 1.5 years, you can't even define what you're accusing the person of. LOL.
It's easy to define.
It's collusion.
It's conspiracy.
longbaugh sundance wrote:
No it's not.
its_baddude has been ...
^ its_baddude
0/10
Fatsgood wrote:
^0/10
Use ya head bruh wrote:
^0/10
Repubocrat wrote:
Donald Trump will improve...
^0/10
LOL
GeeseGander wrote:
No, it's not indicative of such. ... Obama!
^0/10
Fatsgood wrote:
they are far leftist and won't agree to anything that the right says. let them cry some more, trump won and they'll spend many precious years complaining! think about it, if they had lives, real lives, would they be on here all the time? LL, Fatty and Fattypole have no lives. look how many times they post in a day. who are they trying to convince? all are in their 50's and have letsrun as their main artery.
Well, you must be on here all the time to determine how often others post, correct?
And you seem to be someone who posts under different names, making it look like multiple people agree with your point.
I lean way left but specify the things where I do not agree with the right wing.
For instance, I have a problem with Republicans running on fiscal responsibility and seeing that the actual results are deficits go way up under Republican leadership and go down under Democrat leadership.
I point out how they campaign on better healthcare for more people and things get worse under their control.
Trump's biggest shtick was to call everyone else crooked and a liar while he lies at an uncountable rate, will not be transparent on his taxes and is under investigation for possible money laundering. Plus his staff is spending tax payer money like water.
So, you go ahead and write in the specific things where you disagree with my views and we can discuss those things.
The conservative propaganda machine is still in full-on "personally attack teenagers who promote policies we disagree with after they survived a mass-shooting event" mode.
David Hogg is a front page story on Breitbart right now. What a bunch of pathetic losers.
Hillary was investigated by a Republican congress, some of whom have leading roles in the Trump administration, nine times and they found nothing. Thank you, lean one, for dominating these right wing morons.