Sandra Vi going for record across America

Stop and Go wrote:

Stop and Go wrote:

More of the odd stop and gos on Mimi's Garmin: 7:17 AM, 7:57 AM

Similar stops that occurred in a small town are not included. Could be stopping for traffic lights.

Add: 8:57 AM. This one 1/2 mile after leaving a small town. The photo op was over.

Add: 9:36 AM. This on a dirt road. Mimi has decided to run away from the main road. There should be no traffic. Quieter. Safer. But more likely to encounter wild dogs.

All I keep reading is words and assertions but no evidence.

With the cheating Rob Young attempt there was serious evidence and analysis. And which I loved seeing. I hate cheats.

But seriously? What is the evidence that she is cheating? This thread is worse than the rubbish that you get on the Hillary Supporters website. I thought you lot were more likely to be Trumpists. You're all being snowflakes because a Brit and a woman is over there stealing your records.

Dave Krupski wrote:

Oh believe me, I get it. I'm not offering any of my own personal thoughts on Mimi and whether or not her efforts are legitimate (those are mine and mine alone). All I have been saying is that there's not enough objective evidence for anyone to conclusively say "yeah, she's cheating."

And I'm not a huge fan of people offering their opinions without putting their names behind them. Call me old-school. I do see the utility of being anonymous when "outing" someone, but when attacking another person who is also commenting on a thread, I think it's pretty weak to not use your real name. My name is Dave Krupski, that's my real name.

Then register your name using a real email address, and if you dare to, post your comments to your FB page as proof it is really you. Sorry, but your posts match the Modus operandi of the troll who pretends to defend Mimi, but in fact is not. He is simply trolling because he gets off creating havoc.

I'm TRULY not putting my fingers in my ears. Again, for the millionth time, I have no reason at all to defend Mimi (quite the opposite, actually, as my client is going against her).

Personally, I don't know if Mimi is cheating or not. ALL I am saying is that you guys have not come forward with any evidence yet that she actually is cheating. And accusing someone of cheating is a very serious accusation.

Transcon efforts absolutely SHOULD be scrutinized to the highest degree. If I could offer a modicum of advice, it would be to continue your investigative efforts, and point out everything that seems "off," but refrain from the commentary/conclusions . . . just let the facts speak for themselves until there is actual conclusive evidence of wrongdoing...

Y'allHillaryLovers wrote:

All I keep reading is words and assertions but no evidence.

With the cheating Rob Young attempt there was serious evidence and analysis. And which I loved seeing. I hate cheats.

But seriously? What is the evidence that she is cheating? This thread is worse than the rubbish that you get on the Hillary Supporters website. I thought you lot were more likely to be Trumpists. You're all being snowflakes because a Brit and a woman is over there stealing your records.

YAWN. Budding genius is now reusing names used in this thread.

Dave Krupski wrote:

Personally, I don't know if Mimi is cheating or not. ALL I am saying is that you guys have not come forward with any evidence yet that she actually is cheating.

Transcon efforts absolutely SHOULD be scrutinized to the highest degree.

Your two statements are contradictory. No self-respecting attorney would do such a thing. ... I agree with others that you are a FAKE Dave Krupski.

Dave Krupski wrote:

I'm TRULY not putting my fingers in my ears. Again, for the millionth time, I have no reason at all to defend Mimi (quite the opposite, actually, as my client is going against her).

Personally, I don't know if Mimi is cheating or not. ALL I am saying is that you guys have not come forward with any evidence yet that she actually is cheating. And accusing someone of cheating is a very serious accusation.

Transcon efforts absolutely SHOULD be scrutinized to the highest degree. If I could offer a modicum of advice, it would be to continue your investigative efforts, and point out everything that seems "off," but refrain from the commentary/conclusions . . . just let the facts speak for themselves until there is actual conclusive evidence of wrongdoing...

Dave, perhaps you could ask Mimi's team to give us just one tiny video of her running up any hill on the transcon since Mimi can't even get up or down a few steps in the RV without great difficulty.

St Marker wrote:

Humpty dumpty wrote:

Nope, independent documentary team as far as I can see.

If this is true it's nuts. If an independent documentary team just shot and realeased a couple of these 57 mile days in their entirety I'm pretty sure all the questions would stop.

I know that along with the Strava data would be enough for me

How her team doesn't see that they could take the heat off themselves easily is baffling

I think you're hugely overestimating your own importance here. Not you personally but LRs'. There is no heat. There's just a few nameless keyboard runners posting circlejerk arguments.

Contradiction wrote:

Dave Krupski wrote:

Personally, I don't know if Mimi is cheating or not. ALL I am saying is that you guys have not come forward with any evidence yet that she actually is cheating.

Transcon efforts absolutely SHOULD be scrutinized to the highest degree.

Your two statements are contradictory. No self-respecting attorney would do such a thing. ... I agree with others that you are a FAKE Dave Krupski.

Guys, that is the actual Dave Krupski posting. I know because it is the same writing and points he and I discussed in our ongoing email conversation.

Email him and ask him to copy his "post" to his FB page. It is not the real Dave K.

Humpty dumpty wrote:

I think I'M hugely overestimating your own importance here.

So true.

Done; I registered my name on this message board. I'm not going to post everything to Facebook, but I'll post a code word on my FB page so you know I am who I say I am. Just give me some random word to use (and FB friend me), and I'll work that word into a post (it's actually similar to a game we used to play in college...)

Dave's not here wrote:

Email him and ask him to copy his "post" to his FB page. It is not the real Dave K.

I'm positive it's the real Dave K. going by what he just posted here matching the email conversation I just had with him this morning.

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

Contradiction wrote:

Your two statements are contradictory. No self-respecting attorney would do such a thing. ... I agree with others that you are a FAKE Dave Krupski.

Guys, that is the actual Dave Krupski posting. I know because it is the same writing and points he and I discussed in our ongoing email conversation.

I would never hire such a person as an attorney. His claim comes across as an attorney who would defend a race cheater who missed a timing mat: The timing did not work. Or, my client mistakenly jumped over it. Or, my client accidentally ran around it.

Dave Krupski wrote:

Done; I registered my name on this message board. I'm not going to post everything to Facebook, but I'll post a code word on my FB page so you know I am who I say I am. Just give me some random word to use (and FB friend me), and I'll work that word into a post (it's actually similar to a game we used to play in college...)

Nope. A registered name is not a blue color with an email. I can do that too, using your email address.

Dave Krupski wrote:

Done; I registered my name on this message board. I'm not going to post everything to Facebook, but I'll post a code word on my FB page so you know I am who I say I am. Just give me some random word to use (and FB friend me), and I'll work that word into a post (it's actually similar to a game we used to play in college...)

Dave, how about paying on your Facebook saying, "I am wrong. Sorry to LRC."

You know I was the key person that cleared Sandra's names with the trolls after investigating. Or do you think I was wrong about that?

I really don't know what to say to any of these posts. I've never been accused of impersonating myself before, so (I guess) thanks for checking that item off of my bucket list.

If any of you anonymous people are actual humans who have met be before, send me a message and ask me something only you and I would know the answer to. I am who I say I am. And I'm using my own name. Email me (dave@zwittyultra.com), which is widely-available and through my VERY public website (www.zwittyultra.com); I'll happily reply to you.

For a final time: I am NOT defending Mimi or her efforts. I don't know her, I've only met her once. To the contrary, I have every reason for all you guys to be right about her attempt.

That being said, I'm a rational person, and I'm not going to condemn a woman's transcon effort based on little more than less-than-ideal tracking practices for a few weeks, combined with a refusal to engage with you guys as much as you'd like.

We are focused on Sandy and her run...

Dave Krupski wrote:

That being said, I'm a rational person, and I'm not going to condemn a woman's transcon effort based on little more than less-than-ideal tracking practices for a few weeks, combined with a refusal to engage with you guys as much as you'd like.

Dave, you are truly white washing everything. Please don't be a Coach Kev.

Scam_Watcheroo wrote:

Dave Krupski wrote:

That being said, I'm a rational person, and I'm not going to condemn a woman's transcon effort based on little more than less-than-ideal tracking practices for a few weeks, combined with a refusal to engage with you guys as much as you'd like.

Dave, you are truly white washing everything. Please don't be a Coach Kev.

I know many litigation attorneys, like Dave was in his prior life. They would never make posts like he has. No self-respecting attorney would.