What exactly is trump doing here? Does he think his raw animal attractiveness will want other countries to submit to him? Every time he does this the liberal party in Canada gets more votes and fewer foreign politicians will have anything to do with him. Is this attractive talk in some way to m'aga? Is it playing to the American rubes?
Spanky, today:
Good luck to the Great people of Canada. Elect the man who has the strength and wisdom to cut your taxes in half, increase your military power, for free, to the highest level in the World, have your Car, Steel, Aluminum, Lumber, Energy, and all other businesses, QUADRUPLE in size, WITH ZERO TARIFFS OR TAXES, if Canada becomes the cherished 51st. State of the United States of America. No more artificially drawn line from many years ago. Look how beautiful this land mass would be. Free access with NO BORDER. ALL POSITIVES WITH NO NEGATIVES. IT WAS MEANT TO BE! America can no longer subsidize Canada with the Hundreds of Billions of Dollars a year that we have been spending in the past. It makes no sense unless Canada is a State!
Same for Democrats. Every time they talk about allowing men in women’s sports they lose a suburban parent with a daughter. Every time they talk about reparations they lose a Hispanic or Asian voter. Etc
agreed, but talking about gender locks in the lefty votes for the Dems.
Does talking about annexing Canada lock in m'aga votes?
Reporter: You keep saying two weeks… what is two weeks? Give us the actual date
Trump: Two weeks or less and if it’s a little more..
Awe, that upsets you old man. How sad.
You are in your 70's and this is what your life boils down too? Pathetic and embarrassing to live such a life.
You are changing nothing and wasting time when you could be volunteering at a hospital for kids but you choose to do this? I check in and you and your dozen or so pals are still here, every day, crying and complaining. You don't like America, move.
Nate had the election basically 50/50 and trump won by a tiny 1.5%, one of the smallest gaps ever.
He had it pretty much right nationwide.
False, dummy. Harris was supposed to win in a landslide, like Hillary, remember? They had her up by 5 points and you claimed she'd win.
Trump trounced on her and the E.C. is what decides the outcome. Think much?
what are you even talking about. Here's the final Silver prediction. 50/50.
🕒 Last and final update: 12:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 5. Happy Election Day! At exactly midnight on Tuesday, we ran our simulation model for the final time in this election cycle. Out of 80,000 simulations, Kamala Harris won in 40,012 (50.015%) cases. She did not win in 39,988 simulations (49.985%).
False, dummy. Harris was supposed to win in a landslide, like Hillary, remember? They had her up by 5 points and you claimed she'd win.
Trump trounced on her and the E.C. is what decides the outcome. Think much?
what are you even talking about. Here's the final Silver prediction. 50/50.
🕒 Last and final update: 12:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 5. Happy Election Day! At exactly midnight on Tuesday, we ran our simulation model for the final time in this election cycle. Out of 80,000 simulations, Kamala Harris won in 40,012 (50.015%) cases. She did not win in 39,988 simulations (49.985%).
It's okay friend, they give me a laugh every time I check in on this thread. I mean I truly laugh out loud. Trump won, in the end that's all I wanted. I knew that they'd complain day after day after day and they are doing just that.
As was mentioned, Obama deported how many illegals? It's okay, Obama can do what he wants.
If Obama or Biden had said we are cleaning up the waste in government, they'd have applauded both of them and they'd still be clapping. Trump does it and they get all upset and start crying foul.
Trump is cleaning the house of the bad illegals that should never be in this country---and THAT upsets them? Well, it makes me even more happier that he won as that shows just how demented the liberals on this thread actually are.
and yes, he spins everything, but just smile and laugh as he's a miserable old man.
False, dummy. Harris was supposed to win in a landslide, like Hillary, remember? They had her up by 5 points and you claimed she'd win.
Trump trounced on her and the E.C. is what decides the outcome. Think much?
what are you even talking about. Here's the final Silver prediction. 50/50.
🕒 Last and final update: 12:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 5. Happy Election Day! At exactly midnight on Tuesday, we ran our simulation model for the final time in this election cycle. Out of 80,000 simulations, Kamala Harris won in 40,012 (50.015%) cases. She did not win in 39,988 simulations (49.985%).
Harris was predicted to win the states that I listed and then some. MANY liberals predicted her to get well over 300 electoral votes. Yes, that's what I'm talking about. What are YOU talking about as it's your own side that predicted her victory that big?
Remember Iowa sir? Look up what was said on November 5th and look at YOUR own post....just too funny to believe as you fell into the flagpole and 13 Keys garbage.
Reporter: You keep saying two weeks… what is two weeks? Give us the actual date
Trump: Two weeks or less and if it’s a little more..
Seeing your post and the photo of Trump right above it, it occurred to me for the millionth time, "Who the f*** could not hate that guy?"
And then a new thought came to me: It might make sense if Trump's base were limited mostly to men who went to college - or a bit of it - got their as*** kicked in the classroom, and developed a significant dislike for campus liberals (students, faculty, and staff).
But nope, of course a huge slice of Trump's base are red county mo-rans with extremely little - and in some cases ZERO - exposure to liberals in their lives. And they follow little enough actual news to not really have a substantive feel for how widely and deeply they might disagree with them. Nope, just, "Libs are bad, and here are a few silly anecdotes....", and voila, super loyal embracing of a horrible human being in opposition to people and ideas you know very, very little about.
what are you even talking about. Here's the final Silver prediction. 50/50.
🕒 Last and final update: 12:30 a.m., Tuesday, November 5. Happy Election Day! At exactly midnight on Tuesday, we ran our simulation model for the final time in this election cycle. Out of 80,000 simulations, Kamala Harris won in 40,012 (50.015%) cases. She did not win in 39,988 simulations (49.985%).
Harris was predicted to win the states that I listed and then some. MANY liberals predicted her to get well over 300 electoral votes. Yes, that's what I'm talking about. What are YOU talking about as it's your own side that predicted her victory that big?
Remember Iowa sir? Look up what was said on November 5th and look at YOUR own post....just too funny to believe as you fell into the flagpole and 13 Keys garbage.
P.s. I'm not just talking about the popular vote, I'm talking about sweeping the blue states and winning all of the states and then some that I listed in a previous post. You do understand how the Electoral College works, correct? Trump could have had 53% of the popular vote and he'd have still lost if the GREAT LIBERAL minds had been correct about her winning all of those states.
Trump can't break the blue wall? Oh really, he swept them!
What are you smoking right now or are you on meds? She was predicted to win bigly, but you are correct, that she didn't and that's the only thing you are correct about.
Reporter: You keep saying two weeks… what is two weeks? Give us the actual date
Trump: Two weeks or less and if it’s a little more..
Seeing your post and the photo of Trump right above it, it occurred to me for the millionth time, "Who the f*** could not hate that guy?"
And then a new thought came to me: It might make sense if Trump's base were limited mostly to men who went to college - or a bit of it - got their as*** kicked in the classroom, and developed a significant dislike for campus liberals (students, faculty, and staff).
But nope, of course a huge slice of Trump's base are red county mo-rans with extremely little - and in some cases ZERO - exposure to liberals in their lives. And they follow little enough actual news to not really have a substantive feel for how widely and deeply they might disagree with them. Nope, just, "Libs are bad, and here are a few silly anecdotes....", and voila, super loyal embracing of a horrible human being in opposition to people and ideas you know very, very little about.
Incredible.
Says the sissy boy who got his as* kicked in the classroom:)
You clearly have no clue on the breakdown of who voted for Trump and why, do you little fella?
You are a sissy little HYPOCRITICAL liberal who is pouting and crying because he lost, just like in running and any other sport that you participated in.
Incredible, but for me it's in a happy way. You lost, get over it.
Sorry your liberal professor molded your pea brain mind because you couldn't think for yourself in college 35 years ago.
Harris was predicted to win the states that I listed and then some. MANY liberals predicted her to get well over 300 electoral votes. Yes, that's what I'm talking about. What are YOU talking about as it's your own side that predicted her victory that big?
Remember Iowa sir? Look up what was said on November 5th and look at YOUR own post....just too funny to believe as you fell into the flagpole and 13 Keys garbage.
P.s. I'm not just talking about the popular vote, I'm talking about sweeping the blue states and winning all of the states and then some that I listed in a previous post. You do understand how the Electoral College works, correct? Trump could have had 53% of the popular vote and he'd have still lost if the GREAT LIBERAL minds had been correct about her winning all of those states.
Trump can't break the blue wall? Oh really, he swept them!
What are you smoking right now or are you on meds? She was predicted to win bigly, but you are correct, that she didn't and that's the only thing you are correct about.
you don't know enough about how polling works to have a discussion with you. Cheers, hope you had a happy Liberation Day!
This post was edited 20 seconds after it was posted.
Reporter: You keep saying two weeks… what is two weeks? Give us the actual date
Trump: Two weeks or less and if it’s a little more..
Seeing your post and the photo of Trump right above it, it occurred to me for the millionth time, "Who the f*** could not hate that guy?"
And then a new thought came to me: It might make sense if Trump's base were limited mostly to men who went to college - or a bit of it - got their as*** kicked in the classroom, and developed a significant dislike for campus liberals (students, faculty, and staff).
But nope, of course a huge slice of Trump's base are red county mo-rans with extremely little - and in some cases ZERO - exposure to liberals in their lives. And they follow little enough actual news to not really have a substantive feel for how widely and deeply they might disagree with them. Nope, just, "Libs are bad, and here are a few silly anecdotes....", and voila, super loyal embracing of a horrible human being in opposition to people and ideas you know very, very little about.
Incredible.
I went to a school viewed as slightly more conservative (a more accurate description would be not as blatantly woke / liberal though still woke) than similar ones. But there was a ton of crap I had to deal with. And i live in a woke blue city where the people running it (all Democrats) think that homeless and violent criminals are victims of society, and that they should be able to do whatever they want. It's insane
Seeing your post and the photo of Trump right above it, it occurred to me for the millionth time, "Who the f*** could not hate that guy?"
And then a new thought came to me: It might make sense if Trump's base were limited mostly to men who went to college - or a bit of it - got their as*** kicked in the classroom, and developed a significant dislike for campus liberals (students, faculty, and staff).
But nope, of course a huge slice of Trump's base are red county mo-rans with extremely little - and in some cases ZERO - exposure to liberals in their lives. And they follow little enough actual news to not really have a substantive feel for how widely and deeply they might disagree with them. Nope, just, "Libs are bad, and here are a few silly anecdotes....", and voila, super loyal embracing of a horrible human being in opposition to people and ideas you know very, very little about.
Incredible.
I went to a school viewed as slightly more conservative (a more accurate description would be not as blatantly woke / liberal though still woke) than similar ones. But there was a ton of crap I had to deal with. And i live in a woke blue city where the people running it (all Democrats) think that homeless and violent criminals are victims of society, and that they should be able to do whatever they want. It's insane
This mf can’t keep straight whether he is still in school or graduated.
Seeing your post and the photo of Trump right above it, it occurred to me for the millionth time, "Who the f*** could not hate that guy?"
And then a new thought came to me: It might make sense if Trump's base were limited mostly to men who went to college - or a bit of it - got their as*** kicked in the classroom, and developed a significant dislike for campus liberals (students, faculty, and staff).
But nope, of course a huge slice of Trump's base are red county mo-rans with extremely little - and in some cases ZERO - exposure to liberals in their lives. And they follow little enough actual news to not really have a substantive feel for how widely and deeply they might disagree with them. Nope, just, "Libs are bad, and here are a few silly anecdotes....", and voila, super loyal embracing of a horrible human being in opposition to people and ideas you know very, very little about.
Incredible.
I went to a school viewed as slightly more conservative (a more accurate description would be not as blatantly woke / liberal though still woke) than similar ones. But there was a ton of crap I had to deal with. And i live in a woke blue city where the people running it (all Democrats) think that homeless and violent criminals are victims of society, and that they should be able to do whatever they want. It's insane
but dollars to donuts crime in that city is down 80% or more in a generation!
I went to a school viewed as slightly more conservative (a more accurate description would be not as blatantly woke / liberal though still woke) than similar ones. But there was a ton of crap I had to deal with. And i live in a woke blue city where the people running it (all Democrats) think that homeless and violent criminals are victims of society, and that they should be able to do whatever they want. It's insane
This mf can’t keep straight whether he is still in school or graduated.
Are you illiterate? Like usual, a dumb lib is wrong or just can't read.
Both sides act as if they were elected 90 to 10 % when in office. They cater to the far end of the party rather than the middle where most Americans really are politically.
Example 1: Most Americans recognise the deficit is a problem and should be reigned in. Democrats tend to want to keep or increase government services by increasing taxes. Republicans tend to want to cut services and taxes. Reality is we need to increase taxes and cut non essential services. A slow approach would be least disruptive. Neither party seems willing to compromise, but most Americans probably are.
Example 2: Most Americans would probably be fine with transgender people having the right to live as they please with all the protections of any citizen, but not be given special government funded treatment and not be allowed in women's sports. But republicans go to the extreme of restricting rights while the left goes to the extreme of extra special rights.
A politician who can cater to the middle and not stomp on the political far ends could have a profound healing effect on the country. The fact of having three 1 term presidents in a row show this is not happening. Unfortunately, our current media system promotes extremists.
P.s. I'm not just talking about the popular vote, I'm talking about sweeping the blue states and winning all of the states and then some that I listed in a previous post. You do understand how the Electoral College works, correct? Trump could have had 53% of the popular vote and he'd have still lost if the GREAT LIBERAL minds had been correct about her winning all of those states.
Trump can't break the blue wall? Oh really, he swept them!
What are you smoking right now or are you on meds? She was predicted to win bigly, but you are correct, that she didn't and that's the only thing you are correct about.
you don't know enough about how polling works to have a discussion with you. Cheers, hope you had a happy Liberation Day!
LOL, coming from a guy who doesn't know how the EC system works, that's rich! Have a great day liberal loser. That loss must still sting every day, eh? Trump owns you BIGLY and that is enough to give me a smile to the guy who said Harris would win...too funny!