“I view myself as a conservative, but I don’t think I have enough information to defend my stance as well as it should be defended.”
From the Austin Bomber's (Mark Anthony Conditt) Blog.
Topics include:
- Why gay marriage should be illegal
- Why we might want to consider doing away with Sex Offender Registration
Reasonable Republican wrote:
Say what you will about Disco Gary and there are many things me and him clearly have differences of opinion on but he was right about the election whereas you were just about as wrong as anyone could be. Whether you like it or not he clearly has a better idea what the pulse of the country is compared to you especially in the non coastal states. I think you could learn a thing or two from DG that would prevent you Dems from making the same mistakes the next election cycle (just a thought).
Also it would be nice to get some clarification on this whole "Mueller is coming" shtick that you have.
Do you think will Trump be impeached before the end of his first term?
As it stands right now what are his re-election odds at (0%, 50%?)
Can you name one positive thing Trump has done? (Just to confirm your not a partisan hack)
1) I have nothing to learn from DiscoGary. This is not about the election (Good Grief you Trumpers can't stop talking about that. Obama voters never waxed poetically about something in the past. It is very weird.)
2) I have said several times that I will not put a time limit on Mueller's investigation. They investigated B. Clinton for much longer. That was nothing compared to this Trump/Russia mess. I have said and will continue to say that when this is all done, Trump (assuming he doesn't die of natural causes first...I mean he is over 70 and fat) will face severe punishment. I am patient and can wait for justice.
3) Too early to determine re-election odds. We don't even know his opponent yet, whether he will face a legit Republican challenger, and what more we will know by then.
4) I'm sure that Charles Manson did one good thing for SOMEONE in his life. Doesn't erase all the bad he did, so I won't get into anything that Trump has done that might be a good thing. I didn't like many things that Obama did and have said so here, and I have said John Kasich would make a great president, so I am far from a partisan hack. I am against Trump NOT because he is a Republican, but because of his actions as a horrible human being and criminal. I will give you ONE good thing about Trump; as far as I know, there is no video of him beating up a child. Good for him.
Oh...silly me. I left this out.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Flagpole wrote:
Oh...silly me. I left this out.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
How's the running going?
Subway Surfers Addiction wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Oh...silly me. I left this out.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
How's the running going?
Trump is running out of time.
John 3:16+ wrote:
Trollminator wrote:
Godamn his hands are small
You can make fun of whoever you want for whatever reason for no other reason that to simply make yourself feel better. Regardless, please don't use God's name in vain, it's really not cool nor is it right. Thank you.
God's name isn't "God", god damn it!
The Grill Master wrote:
Pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
You are free to act according to your beliefs in America, as am I.
Don't take my freedom to think away from me, goddammit.
Good luck burning for eternity, it's gonna be hot!
OMG, that is hilarious!
Royal We wrote:
Reasonable Republican wrote:
Who cares if the president is fat or has small hands we elected him . . .
We? You mean YOU and the 20% of the US that is like you.
Maybe you should read Trump's tweets to learn what he thinks about body, looks, and personality shaming others means to him.
'Reasonable Repubiican' is right.
The argument of 'Royal We' is essentially similar to Lying Gary's arguments - "oh yeah, the other side did it, so I am going to do it". Copying Trump suggests that you admire him. At the very least it strongly suggests you approve of his behaviors that you are copying.
Good evening! How are all you LRC stable geniuses doing this fine PM?
How does this newfound fixation on Cambridge Analytica jive with the Russian Collusion theory?
The theory was that the Trump campaign wanted to invest in internet marketing but, for whatever reason, couldn't directly pay for it, so Trump had to use his secret back-channel communications with the Russian president to indirectly pay for targeted internet ads. Or something like that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutismjamin wrote:
How does this newfound fixation on Cambridge Analytica jive with the Russian Collusion theory?
The theory was that the Trump campaign wanted to invest in internet marketing but, for whatever reason, couldn't directly pay for it, so Trump had to use his secret back-channel communications with the Russian president to indirectly pay for targeted internet ads. Or something like that.
Here is your proud heritage, jamin.
The Caucasoid Mountains was named after the scientist Yaqub KauKasus Kushitus, thus Caucasians. In the mountain caves (as in cave-men, or cave dwellers), they could avoid the rays of the Sun, as many died from skin cancer (leprosy). The on-going education and welfare of the “Modern-Man” was on the shoulders of those who created (grafted) them... Those who Moors civilized, and gave a basis of education, as a matter of obligation and responsibility, eventually became known as the Colonist. A colonist is one who essentially leeches off of another, including the land, resources, etc. Unfortunately, due to their desire to have the power and control, and their inability to survive and flourish (as was when the Moors left Spain and Spain degraded into beggars, friars, and bandits; and due to their desire to be ‘free’ and sovereign), they began a mission of conquering and colonizing the World, by any means necessary.
HAHAHAHA wrote:
The Grill Master wrote:
Good luck burning for eternity, it's gonna be hot!
OMG, that is hilarious!
Totally unnecessary. This doesn't make our side look very good regardless of your beliefs. Whoever posted it, I apologize on behalf of the people left of the isle. Using God's name like that is wrong.
DiscoGary wrote:
The congressional wrote:
Everything you are saying is what people have said to you for quite some time. They try to get inside your fake world and reason with you. You simply can’t process it. That you type these things without seeing the hypocrisy is depressing.
None are so blind as those who refuse to see.
As a show of good faith I will entertain the possibility that you see things correctly and that my world is fake and built on lies and hatred.
Well then, tomorrow I will attempt to join all you rats in the maze! Try to be patient though. Just like you don't make any sense in my world, it will take me some time to acclimate to yours before I can understand how to communicate on your level. I'm confident you all will help me out with the rules.
The rules are simple. You need evidence to back up your assertions.
For instance, if you think President Obama had something to do with the IRS scandal then you need to point to credible evidence of that. Otherwise, don't make the assertion.
DiscoGary wrote:
Well then, tomorrow I will attempt to join all you rats in the maze! Try to be patient though. Just like you don't make any sense in my world, it will take me some time to acclimate to yours before I can understand how to communicate on your level. I'm confident you all will help me out with the rules.
DiscoGary, the light outside the cave is blinding at first. You will acclimatize soon enough though and become an enlightened man. We shall assist you on this important journey.
Heill wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/20/politics/holocaust-denier-gop-illinois-third-district/index.html
This is interesting because the Republican Party has officially denounced him. I don't know the laws, but I would think that they could keep him off the ballot if they really wanted to.
The Republican Party has pimped itself out so hard just trying to defend Trump and move to the right, it’s embarrassing.
And Trump lied, my 401k is not “on fire”
nontrumper wrote:
HAHAHAHA wrote:
OMG, that is hilarious!
Totally unnecessary. This doesn't make our side look very good regardless of your beliefs. Whoever posted it, I apologize on behalf of the people left of the isle. Using God's name like that is wrong.
That's even funnier.
Your post doesn't make our side look intelligent regardless of your beliefs. I apologize for the lameness of your post - it does not reflect well upon you and is truly hilarious to all rational beings.
///
As a side note - God's name is not "God". Just thought you might want to know.
Count Chocula wrote:
Heill wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/20/politics/holocaust-denier-gop-illinois-third-district/index.htmlThis is interesting because the Republican Party has officially denounced him. I don't know the laws, but I would think that they could keep him off the ballot if they really wanted to.
If they could that would be disturbing. It would suggest that two private organizations (Rep, Dem parties) own the country (which may not be too far from the truth).