Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

The congressional wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Here ya go!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtWTQ9AzwEk

Same video you posted before, and as was pointed out to you before, where she blames the other embassy attacks on the video, which I just told you, which has been told to you before, etc.

Never learn!

Pssst, Gary doesn't remember what he posts. True story.

Trollminator wrote:

Fat hurts wrote:

It has nothing to do with liberal or conservative. This is where data analytics meets modern psychology. It's actually a growing field of study.

It's no secret that game developers and social platforms are using these techniques to keep you staring at their apps. It comes as no surprise that the same kinds of techniques can be used to influence political opinions and drive voter turnout.

Unfortunately uneducated mouth breathers are probably more susceptible to falling for such tactics.

More susceptible maybe, but anyone can fall for this stuff. Opinion and perception are more malleable than we like to think.

Maybe its not illegal to blame a private citizen for high level government screw ups, but its banana republic stuff and should never be allowed in this country.

The fact that Hillary/Obama blamed a private citizen for their deadly mistake and then threw the guy in jail after lying to the families and promising to go after the guy is one of the most shameful episodes in this country's history.

But hey, I'm sure Snopes has got something that will allow you to believe nothing went wrong so you can sleep at night.

Doublin' down!

The congressional wrote:

Same video you posted before, and as was pointed out to you before, where she blames the other embassy attacks on the video, which I just told you, which has been told to you before, etc.

Never learn!

Of course, 100% proof and the Democratic Deflection Playbook is pulled out. She blamed it on a YouTube video and YouTube has the video of her saying it. Are you like 65 years old or 12?

You can't be married, but surely divorced if you ever were, maybe more than once. I'm inside right now and it's daylight outside. I'd send you a picture of the sun, but you'd call it fake. What a nut job!

Torrrot wrote:

The congressional wrote:

If this were true, you’d be able to provide support for her saying as much. Pass along, please.

Also provide where the committee investigations found her to blame the Benghazi attack on a video.

Also provide where blaming it on the video would be illegal.

Thanks!

Of course, 100% proof and the Democratic Deflection Playbook is pulled out. She blamed it on a YouTube video and YouTube has the video of her saying it. Are you like 65 years old or 12?

You can't be married, but surely divorced if you ever were, maybe more than once. I'm inside right now and it's daylight outside. I'd send you a picture of the sun, but you'd call it fake. What a nut job!

Then provide the YouTube video of her blaming the video for the Benghazi attacks. You are certain it exists, so please link.

Thanks!

WOW . . . A democrat takes over the senate seat held by a republican.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/mississippi-governor-appoints-cindy-hyde-smith-to-the-senate--and-draws-a-backlash-from-the-white-house/2018/03/21/0d88e03c-2d22-11e8-8ad6-fbc50284fce8_story.html

The congressional wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Here ya go!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtWTQ9AzwEk

Same video you posted before, and as was pointed out to you before, where she blames the other embassy attacks on the video, which I just told you, which has been told to you before, etc.

Never learn!

"We've seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We've seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to do with. It is hard for the American people to make sense of that because it is senseless. ..."

You guys will believe anything to exonerate your side. Absolutely anything. There is no lie so obvious that you will shy away from it. Which BTW confirms what I had long thought to be true. There is no intelligent discussion to be had with people who put no value on the truth.

MISSISSIPPI wrote:

WOW . . . A democrat takes over the senate seat held by a republican.

She WAS a democrat and changed her spots a few years ago. That seems to be why Trump opposed her to take the Senate seat. Oh, and she is a woman.

As your quote shows, she blamed the attacks on the other embassies on the video. Words have meanings but you will twist them into whatever you want to believe. THAT is why an intelligent conversation cannot be had with YOU.

The congressional wrote:

...

As your quote shows, she blamed the attacks on the other embassies on the video. Words have meanings but you will twist them into whatever you want to believe. THAT is why an intelligent conversation cannot be had with YOU.

You know what's disturbing. I think you really buy that spin. You believe the liberal media rat maze is real. I'll bet you believe that Obama had nothing to do with the IRS Tea Party scandal too. That's too bad. Your ideas won't work because your world isn't real.

I try to help but I can't. Your minds are too well defended. Things are never going to work the way you think they will, but you will always be provided with just enough spin to think its the fault of Republicans or evil corporations or white racism, etc. I would say, "but let's see who can get it right on tax cuts", but then the tax cuts happen, the economy booms, and VOILA, Obama gets credit for the boom.

There's no way to get through.

Look in the mirror, pot.

Actually I made some progress a couple of days ago when I joined you guys in the rate maze and tried to explain everything from that point of view. You simply can't process anything coming from outside the rat maze. I'll work on immersing myself in the rat maze mindset and try to put things in that context.

DiscoGary wrote:

Actually I made some progress a couple of days ago when I joined you guys in the rate maze and tried to explain everything from that point of view. You simply can't process anything coming from outside the rat maze. I'll work on immersing myself in the rat maze mindset and try to put things in that context.

You were wearing your Trump blinders. They are welded on to your truck skull.

DiscoGary wrote:

Actually I made some progress a couple of days ago when I joined you guys in the rate maze and tried to explain everything from that point of view. You simply can't process anything coming from outside the rat maze. I'll work on immersing myself in the rat maze mindset and try to put things in that context.

Everything you are saying is what people have said to you for quite some time. They try to get inside your fake world and reason with you. You simply can’t process it. That you type these things without seeing the hypocrisy is depressing.

The congressional wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Actually I made some progress a couple of days ago when I joined you guys in the rate maze and tried to explain everything from that point of view. You simply can't process anything coming from outside the rat maze. I'll work on immersing myself in the rat maze mindset and try to put things in that context.

Everything you are saying is what people have said to you for quite some time. They try to get inside your fake world and reason with you. You simply can’t process it. That you type these things without seeing the hypocrisy is depressing.

None are so blind as those who refuse to see.

As a show of good faith I will entertain the possibility that you see things correctly and that my world is fake and built on lies and hatred.

Well then, tomorrow I will attempt to join all you rats in the maze! Try to be patient though. Just like you don't make any sense in my world, it will take me some time to acclimate to yours before I can understand how to communicate on your level. I'm confident you all will help me out with the rules.

DiscoGary wrote:

None are so blind as those who refuse to see.

^ Chant of the Trumpsters

DiscoGary wrote:

I think I'll double down on this:

The purpose of this investigation is to punish Trump, his family, his friends, his supporters, and everyone associated with him so badly that NO ONE ever again tries to dethrone the Establishment in DC.

SUPER load.

DiscoGary wrote:

One more time:

THE PURPOSE OF THIS INVESTIGATION IS TO PUNISH TRUMP, HIS FAMILY, HIS FRIENDS, HIS SUPPORTERS, AND EVERYONE ASSOCIATED WITH HIM SO BADLY THAT NO ONE WILL EVER AGAIN TRY TO DETHRONE THE ESTABLISHMENT IN DC.

Nope. The investigation has merit. If nothing else, it has brought down some bad actors, but Trump will surely follow. He is not behaving like an innocent man would.

What the investigation WILL do is it will stifle future wannabe dictators who have criminal pasts and criminal activity as part of their very being from running for President...for a while. At some point there will be another person like Trump who believes he is above the law who will run for the highest office in the land.

Do know...

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.