Official LRC President Donald J Trump Thread

Coup wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

This isn't justice, it's a coup.

Which is how house republicans played it when they impeached Bill Clinton for Whitewater---oops, of legal-age, and willing sex partner, Monica's satined blue dress.

House Republicans wanted nothing to do with impeachment. They had to do it because Clinton was guilty of a crime.

DiscoGary wrote:

Like I said during the campaign, the only choice is to fight AND lose.

^ Fixed that 4U.

There is not way out for your hero . . . well, except a jail cell.

DiscoGary wrote:

Coup wrote:

Which is how house republicans played it when they impeached Bill Clinton for Whitewater---oops, of legal-age, and willing sex partner, Monica's satined blue dress.

House Republicans wanted nothing to do with impeachment. They had to do it because Clinton was guilty of a crime.

Errr . . . you claimed that the CRIME MUST be identified BEFORE an investigation can proceed, AND that the investigation MJST BE LIMITED ONLY to that CRIME. . . . Clinton's investigation never mentioned that it was focused on lying about a satined blue dress worn by a willing sex partner.

DiscoGary wrote:

Count Chocula wrote:

...

So it's only prudent to investigate and figure out exactly what happened.

...

... and we've investigated Trump's involvement and found nothing. Now, let's move on to the Democrats' part in election corruption. We haven't even started that yet.

Trump should fire Mueller and order Sessions to begin investigations into all the corruption on the Dem's side and in government. Trump would survive it no problem. This is all-out war and it's about time Trump used EVERYTHING in his power to fight back. A good start would be to simply fire everyone in government hired under Obama. It's time to drain the swamp. The people would support him bigly!

You think that if somehow Trump gets Mueller fired that he would survive that no problem? Not true, brother. Not true.

Dude, Trump IS the swamp. A new version on steroids. Incompetent, a serial liar, a bad bad person who is susceptible to blackmail from many sources, and as Mueller will eventually show, a criminal.

Do know...

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

nontrumper wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

This has nothing to do with guilt or innocence. There is no crime being investigated.

Obstruction of justice.

Money laundering.

Conspiracy.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/03/muellers-obstruction-focus-is-likely-the-tip-of-the-iceberg.html?utm_source=tw&utm_medium=s3&utm_campaign=sharebutton-b

.....are three more things that will lead to zero charges against Trump.

DiscoGary wrote:

House Republicans wanted nothing to do with impeachment. They had to do it because Clinton was guilty of a crime.

Had Ken Starr been given a week's notice to present his case and shutdown the investigation less than a year into it, Clinton would not have been guilty of perjury which is the only crime demonstrated.

Monkeys typing wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

If all that's true then how come Mueller isn't investigating Hillary's involvement with Fusion GPS, the dossier, and it's Russian ties? How come Mueller isn't investigating Strozk and his plans to undermine Trump if elected? Why isn't Mueller looking into the illegal unmasking of the Trump campaign by the FBI? How come Mueller isn't investigating how the FISA warrant was issued based on opposition paid trash?

Ignoring the merit of your claims, how is it you know that Mueller isn't investigating any of these items?

Because my world view is close enough to the real world that I can make correct predictions based on the things I see happening.

You can not. That should bother you. That's how I got to where I am now. It bothered me to be wrong so I learned how to get it right. Liberals don't appear to be bothered by being wrong. You are fed some excuse about how it's the fault of Republicans etc, and then you come on here and parrot that crap, hate the people you are supposed to hate, call them names, and I guess that makes it all OK for you. Well, that's not good enough for me.

My world view informs me that Mueller is not looking into anything that would exonerate Trump or find anyone other than Trump and his associates guilty, because this isn't about justice.

We'll see if I am right. And we WILL see that I am right... again.

You guys have no idea how much I wish I was wrong about this stuff. I come here hoping someone here can show me some reason for hope that has so far eluded me, but all you do is confirm my world view, and it's grim.

DiscoGary wrote:

Innocent Trump wrote:

Innocent Trump has no need to put any restrictions on the investigation. Bill Clinton's investigation last a BIGLY FOUR years.

Yes he does. The purpose of this investigation is to punish Trump, his family, his friends, his supporters, and everyone associated with him so badly that NO ONE ever again tries to dethrone the Establishment in DC. This has nothing to do with justice, guilt, innocence, or any legal process. This is a political coup of the Establishment government fighting against the people and their elected representative. This is all-out scorched earth political warfare and Trump needs to use every power he has to defeat the Establishment.

Trump must win this. And he can if he fights.

Wow. This is not an innocent man against the establishment. That is BS to the nth degree. The mentally challenged bagger at my local grocery store would be anti-establishment too, but you can't just look at that and say that's a good thing. Has to be some context...is the person qualified? Is the person free from potential blackmail? Does this person show good organizational and leadership skills? Does this person lie? Does this person lie A LOT?

We are a rule of law nation, and Trump is obstructing at every turn. He is for sure guilty of something that he doesn't want to come out, and you know that to be true...there is just no way you believe otherwise. You can hide behind what you believe to be an illegal investigation (it isn't) or a biased investigation (it isn't), but come on, you know Trump is not an innocent man, and I'm not just talking about a little tax evasion or some other minor thing that he would just pay a penalty for. He is in deep to someone, and it is more likely that he is closer to bankrupt than he has the $10 billion dollars he says he does.

Seriously, you don't REALLY believe he is an innocent man who is being harassed by the left due only to politics, do you?

Try to separate wishes from reality, brother. I chose Virginia to win the whole thing in my bracket (just for fun, no gambling for me). I was in denial that they would lose until it was VERY close to the end, so I understand how that goes. It is time for you to smell the coffee, brother.

Mueller is coming (legally).

The clown is done.

[quote]DiscoGary wrote:

Because my world view is A TRUMPIAN ECHO CHAMBER./quote]

^Corrected

You are feeding all the lies they feed you. Good boy.

DiscoGary wrote:

Innocent Trump wrote:

Innocent Trump has no need to put any restrictions on the investigation. Bill Clinton's investigation last a BIGLY FOUR years.

Yes he does. The purpose of this investigation is to punish Trump, his family, his friends, his supporters, and everyone associated with him so badly that NO ONE ever again tries to dethrone the Establishment in DC. This has nothing to do with justice, guilt, innocence, or any legal process. This is a political coup of the Establishment government fighting against the people and their elected representative. This is all-out scorched earth political warfare and Trump needs to use every power he has to defeat the Establishment.

Trump must win this. And he can if he fights.

THAT'S RIGHT!!! (snicker snicker)

YOU TELL 'EM, DISCO!!! (tee hee, tee hee)

THIS IS ALL ABOUT THE DEEP STATE. OUR NATION'S SURVIVAL AND OUR OWN FREEDOMS ARE AT STAKE. IF THE DEEP STATE WINS, WELCOME TO 1984!!! (roflol)

.

.

.

.

.

my hero, the disco kid :-)

Trollminator wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

Great. Give him a week to make his case, then fire him. You'd find out he has absolutely nothing. We'd already know if he did.

Gary only in your world do investigations start with a conviction before evidence is gathered, analyzed and presented. Republicans took their sweet time sweeping through every possible route to get something to stick on Hillary over Benghazi so relax this is going to take a while.

Yeah, really, what the hell? The big prize is ALWAYS last in cases like this. Get incriminating evidence on the small fish so that they have a plea deal to give up info on the bigger fish with the prize always being the biggest one. Takes time. Takes effort. The template for this is more set in stone than a 4-chord pop song.

Gary...

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

nontrumper wrote:

DiscoGary wrote:

If all that's true then how come Mueller isn't investigating Hillary's involvement with Fusion GPS, the dossier, and it's Russian ties? How come Mueller isn't investigating Strozk and his plans to undermine Trump if elected? Why isn't Mueller looking into the illegal unmasking of the Trump campaign by the FBI? How come Mueller isn't investigating how the FISA warrant was issued based on opposition paid trash?

You are right. Mueller can go anywhere but he's not going anywhere near the crimes and corruption which involve Democrats or the Establishment government. Mueller populated his entire team with hard core Dem political hacks with questionable reputations for impartial investigations. Mueller is a political hack defending Democrats and the Establishment.

This isn't justice, it's a coup.

Wow. I think your tin foil hat is on a bit too tight these days.

Hey, knock it off with the tin foil hat comments! Disco Kid is my hero!

How do you know he isn't investigating some of those things you mentioned? I'd bet that he is. In fact, given who Mueller has interviewed, it's a pretty sure bet.

Mueller is going where the evidence leads.

Few would doubt that your world view dominates your perception of reality even in the face of contradiction. I'm surprised to have you say so directly.

TrumpedU2016 wrote:

nontrumper wrote:

Obstruction of justice.

Money laundering.

Conspiracy.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/03/muellers-obstruction-focus-is-likely-the-tip-of-the-iceberg.html?utm_source=tw&utm_medium=s3&utm_campaign=sharebutton-b

.....are three more things that will lead to zero charges against Trump.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2018/03/21/dershowitz_trump_100_right_there_never_should_have_been_special_counsel_no_probable_cause.html

Hahahahahahaha!!! Dershowitz! That's funny. What do Dershowitz, Trump, Clinton, and Epstein all have in common?!?!?!

For every Dershowitz, there are 100 other respected lawyers would say that obstruction of justice could likely be proven by what is available in the public domain.

Dershowitz!!! That's some funny sh*t.

It's 2+ years after the peak of the last presidential election and there's still an obsession with trying to prove that Trump used unusually dirty tactics to win. We're down to cataloging every consulting firm that Trump's campaign employed so we can try to build this narrative that Trump's amateur campaign staff had a secret, shady internet advertising plan that no other campaign can rival because all other campaigns are more ethical or don't know the secret recipe. The internet made "our democracy" irrelevant starting around 2016 and of course not in 2012, 2008, etc. It's only recently that political scientists Eric Trump, PhD and Jared Kushner, MD, PhD figured out how to weaponize social media.

DiscoGary wrote:

Liberals don't appear to be bothered by being wrong. You are fed some excuse about how it's the fault of Republicans etc, and then you come on here and parrot that crap, hate the people you are supposed to hate, call them names, and I guess that makes it all OK for you.

1) Those of us against Trump are blaming TRUMP for his predicament...not Republicans. There are a few who are crazy like Matt Gaetz from Florida. There are a lot of respectable Republicans though...Jeff Flake, John McCain, Lindsay Graham, etc.

2) The vast majority of the name calling comes from the President and those who support him. It's not even close.

You will be shown to be so wrong on this.

Mueller is coming.

The clown is done.

Uhhh, yeah, you also are the man behind the term "Flagpoling" based on your ridiculous Flagpole of 2016. So, you know, the advice doesn't mean much considering the source, and how you have acted since. Sorry.