Lol dwumpf wrote:
Hurl wrote:Yeah, no surprise other than a 20-point going to 4-point gap using a Democratic candidate placeholder in a district that's been Repub forever. If this was an experiment to see how how to turn over several seats, I'd say it was beyond a success.
We'll see next year.
Haha this is such a transparent and desperate last-ditch effort to pretend it wasn't a devastating loss for Democrats.
How embarrassing for your party.
You must have been miserable the last 8 years.
Jimmy Talon wrote:
hey libs, its are district an we can register who we want for voteing. if you want to let illegals and blacks vote up there thats yore'r rite but we get to chose in are district. fck vote rites
I give you ... the Republican Party.
Karen Handel (Republican) 51.9% 134,595
Jon Ossoff (Democratic) 48.1% 124,893
So he spent $22 million for 125K votes?[/quote]
Not just THAT:
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s Kyle Wingfield posted a comparison on his social media account.
Nov. 2016: Rodney Stooksbury (D) spends $0, wins 124,917 votes in #GA6
June 2017: Jon Ossoff (D) spends $23M+, wins 124,893.
— Kyle Wingfield AJC (@kwingfieldajc) June 21, 2017
In Georgia’s 6th Congressional District, the Democrat candidate Rodney Stooksbury spent nothing -- nada, zip, zero, ZILCH -- and won 124,917 votes in November 2016.
In the same district just seven months later, Democrat candidate Jon Ossoff spent more than $23 million to win.... garnered 124,893 votes
Which is a NET LOSS of Dem votes...
Edible Rex wrote:
Jimmy Talon wrote:hey libs, its are district an we can register who we want for voteing. if you want to let illegals and blacks vote up there thats yore'r rite but we get to chose in are district. fck vote rites
I give you ... the Republican Party.
Edible Rex = Jimmy Talon
hoo-ahh wrote:
Karen Handel (Republican) 51.9% 134,595Jon Ossoff (Democratic) 48.1% 124,893
So he spent $22 million for 125K votes?
Not just THAT:
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution’s Kyle Wingfield posted a comparison on his social media account.
Nov. 2016: Rodney Stooksbury (D) spends $0, wins 124,917 votes in #GA6
June 2017: Jon Ossoff (D) spends $23M+, wins 124,893.
— Kyle Wingfield AJC (@kwingfieldajc) June 21, 2017
In Georgia’s 6th Congressional District, the Democrat candidate Rodney Stooksbury spent nothing -- nada, zip, zero, ZILCH -- and won 124,917 votes in November 2016.
In the same district just seven months later, Democrat candidate Jon Ossoff spent more than $23 million to win.... garnered 124,893 votes
Which is a NET LOSS of Dem votes...[/quote]
The other interesting thing is that in the primary, Ossoff got 48% of the vote.
In the runoff, after spending $23 million more on the campaign, he got the same 48% of the vote.
So the extra $23 million got him exactly no additional votes.
well wrote:
Racehorse wrote:HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Why is it so funny that prior to an election decided by 4 points, someone suggested that one of those candidates might win?
It's funny that this clown was holding out hope for a win, only to not get it. Sucks to be a loser on the left.
Remember how the media told us time and time again that, not only was Trump going to lose to Hillary, the GOP would get slammed in the Senatorial and Congressional races due to Trump.
I sincerely hope that by now anyone who pays attention to the MSM does so only to see what the latest lies and propaganda are -- which ironically can be analyzed to get to the truth.
Racehorse wrote:
well wrote:Why is it so funny that prior to an election decided by 4 points, someone suggested that one of those candidates might win?
It's funny that this clown was holding out hope for a win, only to not get it. Sucks to be a loser on the left.
My mistake. I didn't realize that saying someone "might actually win" constituted "holding out hope for a win". I thought it was an observation meant to answer the thread title of "how badly is Ossoff going to lose the election".
hoo-ahh wrote:
Nov. 2016: Rodney Stooksbury (D) spends $0, wins 124,917 votes in #GA6June 2017: Jon Ossoff (D) spends $23M+, wins 124,893.
In Georgia’s 6th Congressional District, the Democrat candidate Rodney Stooksbury spent nothing -- nada, zip, zero, ZILCH -- and won 124,917 votes in November 2016.
In the same district just seven months later, Democrat candidate Jon Ossoff spent more than $23 million to win.... garnered 124,893 votes
Which is a NET LOSS of Dem votes...
On the other hand, the Republicans still haven't cut taxes or even repealed ObamaCare like they promised fifteen bazillion times in every anti-Obama campaign, so who's winning now?
Pelosi 2020 wrote:
hoo-ahh wrote:In Georgia’s 6th Congressional District, the Democrat candidate Rodney Stooksbury spent nothing -- nada, zip, zero, ZILCH -- and won 124,917 votes in November 2016.
In the same district just seven months later, Democrat candidate Jon Ossoff spent more than $23 million to win.... garnered 124,893 votes
Which is a NET LOSS of Dem votes...
On the other hand, the Republicans still haven't cut taxes or even repealed ObamaCare like they promised fifteen bazillion times in every anti-Obama campaign, so who's winning now?
They're taking their time. There's no rush. They have more than seven and half years to do it.
john utah wrote:
Classic spin after a loss. Dems threw the kitchen sink at this and lost. 6x1 outspending the GOP candidate who was a nobody
Except for facts that STRONGLY suggested a Democrat was never going to win. History is funny that way.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
john utah wrote:Dems threw the kitchen sink at this and lost. 6x1 outspending the GOP candidate who was a nobody
Except for facts that STRONGLY suggested a Democrat was never going to win. .
Why did they waste the money then?
exthrower wrote:
The Dimms and the media harped constantly about how this race was going to be a referendum on Trump...and they were right....
if that's what the election was, this thing was a disaster for trump. The last congressional election was R +20. This one was R +4.
Tell you something?
eric a blair wrote:
exthrower wrote:The Dimms and the media harped constantly about how this race was going to be a referendum on Trump...and they were right....
if that's what the election was, this thing was a disaster for trump. The last congressional election was R +20. This one was R +4.
Tell you something?
Spending $30m to lose votes compared to the 2016 election count (and 2017 primary percentage) sounds like a winning plan to me.
eric a blair wrote:
exthrower wrote:The Dimms and the media harped constantly about how this race was going to be a referendum on Trump...and they were right....
if that's what the election was, this thing was a disaster for trump. The last congressional election was R +20. This one was R +4.
Tell you something?
Yep. Won again.
eric a blair wrote:
if that's what the election was, this thing was a disaster for trump. The last congressional election was R +20. This one was R +4.
Tell you something?
That the Hillary 2016 campaign could have used a genius like you. Maybe she would have only lost by ~15 electoral votes instead of 77.
Wouldn't happen in Venezuela wrote:
So an unelected judge can just decide ("order") that the will of the people regarding voting times be ignored? And people wonder why there is so much vote fraud in USA?
Looks like the voter fraud issue just won't go away.
http://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/did-votes-by-noncitizens-cost-trump-the-2016-popular-vote-sure-looks-that-waywell wrote:
Racehorse wrote:It's funny that this clown was holding out hope for a win, only to not get it. Sucks to be a loser on the left.
My mistake. I didn't realize that saying someone "might actually win" constituted "holding out hope for a win". I thought it was an observation meant to answer the thread title of "how badly is Ossoff going to lose the election".
If you're smart, you'll stop making such mistakes.
Keep Pelosi, she's pure gold wrote:
eric a blair wrote:if that's what the election was, this thing was a disaster for trump. The last congressional election was R +20. This one was R +4.
Tell you something?
Spending $30m to lose votes compared to the 2016 election count (and 2017 primary percentage) sounds like a winning plan to me.
it's a republican district. Ossoff did extraordinarily well. If a Repub did that well in a Los Angeles County election he would be a hero.
here are the historical results from that district. See if you can see a pattern.
2008: 68-31
2010:100-0
2012:65-35
2014:66-33
2016:62-38
2017: 52-48
hint: Compare the numbers in each election to the 2017 numbers.
eric a blair wrote:
Keep Pelosi, she's pure gold wrote:Spending $30m to lose votes compared to the 2016 election count (and 2017 primary percentage) sounds like a winning plan to me.
it's a republican district. Ossoff did extraordinarily well. If a Repub did that well in a Los Angeles County election he would be a hero.
here are the historical results from that district. See if you can see a pattern.
2008: 68-31
2010:100-0
2012:65-35
2014:66-33
2016:62-38
2017: 52-48
hint: Compare the numbers in each election to the 2017 numbers.
Yep. Lost every single one.